Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сергей Бойлерная

Channel

Сергей Бойлерная

@kostenkovru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,582subscribers

+847 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001071748817
TypeChannel
Username@kostenkovru
DescriptionЧто ответить, когда хамят, лезут в личное и продавливают. Разбираю реальные ситуации: какая фраза работает и почему. СПРАВОЧНИК ФРАЗ И ЖЕСТОВ — в закрепе. Создаю отделы продаж, 630+ кейсов, 100к на YouTube.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kostenkovru

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,7348,5828,1586 August 2026 — 7,735 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,735 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,734 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,755 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,739 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,759 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,770 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,764 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,779 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,799 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,793 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,799 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,832 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,839 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,880 subscribers1 October 2026 — 8,001 subscribers8 October 2026 — 8,017 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,080 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,191 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,214 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,235 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,257 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,283 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,346 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,555 subscribers8 November 2026 — 8,564 subscribers12 November 2026 — 8,582 subscribers6 August 202612 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 98 days, net +847. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,607–8,709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 10:048,582+18
8 Nov 2026, 03:118,564+9
4 Nov 2026, 20:108,555+209
1 Nov 2026, 09:418,346+63
29 Oct 2026, 08:388,283+26
25 Oct 2026, 20:298,257+22
22 Oct 2026, 21:578,235+21
19 Oct 2026, 18:498,214+23
17 Oct 2026, 03:058,191+111
13 Oct 2026, 20:518,080+63
8 Oct 2026, 13:398,017+16
1 Oct 2026, 16:168,001+121
16 Sept 2026, 16:017,880+41
13 Sept 2026, 01:417,839+7
8 Sept 2026, 20:197,832+33
3 Sept 2026, 22:597,799+6
31 Aug 2026, 21:567,793-6
29 Aug 2026, 07:267,799+20
26 Aug 2026, 05:257,779+15
23 Aug 2026, 10:067,764first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.32%
avg views ÷ 8,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
800
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held95 (25 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total23,986
Reactions total441
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
411
Videos
351
Links
370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,087 reactions across 90 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍51147.0%
🔥23721.8%
❤12011.0%
👏716.53%
💯635.80%
😁353.22%
🥰242.21%
🤣141.29%
😱30.276%
👎20.184%
✍10.092%
👀10.092%
💩10.092%
😨10.092%
🤔10.092%
🤡10.092%
🤨10.092%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,087 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 95 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kostenkovru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 95 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC292 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Записал короткое видео. «Где ты был? С кем? Почему не брал телефон?» — как отвечать, когда вас допрашивают. Там три фразы, которые красиво ломают допрос. После них уже не вы оправдываетесь, а вам объясняют свое поведение. Смотрите 👆 — и перешлите тому, кого постоянно допрашивают. Пусть наконец перестанет оправдываться.

👍3

12 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC291 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍10👏2

11 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC445 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Claude в России: как работать и не получить бан Вы наверняка заметили: Claude сейчас сильно банит аккаунты из России. С ChatGPT проще — через нужные сервисы им можно спокойно пользоваться. С Claude так не получается. Меня самого уже дважды жёстко банили. Я нашёл способ, который почти полностью убирает риск бана. Теперь я спокойно работаю с Claude. Если тема интересна, напишите «+» в комментариях. Так я пойму, что …

👍3🔥3

10 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC534 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

«Лада из зада» — честный опрос сотрудников 🔥 Во время репортажа с АВТОВАЗа на сборочном оборудовании заметили надпись «Лада из зада». Кадр разлетелся как раз на фоне отзыва почти 3 тысяч машин из-за дефекта подвески. Пиарщики сейчас ищут виноватых. А собственнику я бы задал другой вопрос. Эту надпись сделал не журналист и не конкурент, ее сделал свой человек на линии. Так люди внутри относятся к тому, что собирают.…

👍6😁3

8 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC657 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026

6,3 миллиарда долларов. Через один ноутбук В конце октября у Binance украли около 6,3 миллиарда долларов. Это крупнейший взлом в истории криптовалют. Не через сложную дыру в системе. Через ноутбук одного инженера. Огромная компания, миллиарды на защиту. А всё держалось на одном человеке. И я подумал, что так устроена жизнь почти у каждого из нас. Где-то обязательно есть одна точка, на которой держится всё. В сем…

👍8💯3❤2👏1

6 Nov 2026, 10:28 UTC703 views11 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

5 фраз, которые убивают ваши продажи Почему клиенты «пропадают» после звонка? Чаще всего дело не в цене, а в словах. Собрал 5 фраз, которые менеджеры говорят по привычке, и которые сливают сделки. Клиент уходит не от цены, он уходит от слабых сотрудников.

👍8🔥2👏1

5 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC757 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Мы запустили новую услугу: ЭКСПЕРТИЗА вашей системы продаж 🔥 Заявки есть, а денег нет. Планы горят. А в отпуск не уехать: без вас все встанет. Знакомо? Значит, деньги утекают через дыру, которую изнутри не видно. 30 минут в Zoom с экспертом «Бойлерной». Разбираем цифры, менеджеров, CRM и мотивацию и прямо на встрече показываем, где компания теряет деньги. Готовиться не нужно. После встречи у вас 3 документа: 1. Ко…

👍3👏1

4 Nov 2026, 10:17 UTC731 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Записал короткое видео. Пять фраз, которые должен использовать каждый руководитель. Смотрите 👆 — и перешлите своему начальнику. Пусть оценит, а во второй части разберем, что говорят за его спиной.

👍3

4 Nov 2026, 10:17 UTC705 views24 reactions1 Starread 13 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍14🤣9🥰1

3 Nov 2026, 12:55 UTC817 views21 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Не знаете, что ответить? Переспросите 🎯 Клиент дослушал, откинулся на стуле и говорит: «Не, ну это дорого. Я, наверное, пас». У менеджера в голове белый лист. Скрипты, которые он зубрил, куда-то делись. Секунда, две, три. Клиент смотрит и уже понимает, что выиграл. Ступор хуже любого плохого ответа. После него можно выдать идеальный аргумент, его уже не слышат. В эту секунду обычно делают одно из трех. Оправдываю…

👍11🔥5❤2💯2🤔1

2 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC831 views21 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Мне только что позвонили из ВТБ. — Сергей, здравствуйте. — Здравствуйте, что хотели? — Я из ВТБ, звоню по поводу вашего ИП. Вам нужен новый расчётный счёт? — Нет. — Ну и ладно, до свидания. Пятнадцать секунд, и весь разговор. Один из крупнейших банков страны, и вот так он продаёт. Капец, друзья. Просто ж... как продают.

😁17🔥2❤1👍1

2 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC868 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026

«Плюс сорок к окладу, или ухожу». Не уйдет Все обсуждают «ИИ-бумеранг». Компании сокращали людей ради нейросетей, а теперь зовут их обратно. Ваш лучший менеджер эту новость тоже прочитал. И понял, что даже нейросеть его не заменила. Значит, можно и поторговаться. Ноябрь, план горит, до закрытия года два месяца. Он заходит вечером: «Слушайте, мне тут предложили. Короче, или плюс сорок к окладу, или я с января все».…

👍12💯3🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @kostenkovru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @kostenkovru as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Виталий Голицын
@VitalyGolitzyn · 26,732
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Бизнес Подкасты
@business_podcast · 171,801
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Олег Шевелев
@olegcloser · 35,486
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Владимир Якуба
@vyakuba · 49,073
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Наука Успеха | Мотивация | Бизнес
@naykaycnexa · 47,929
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 25 August 2026
Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи
@ryzov_igor · 46,714
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Максим Батырев
@Maxim_Batyrev · 20,702
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
5 бизнес идей
@bussideas · 222,427
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сергей Бойлерная” (@kostenkovru), 8,582 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kostenkovru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.