Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net +1,136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,516–6,992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 20:50
6,822
+22
4 Nov 2026, 04:38
6,800
+5
1 Nov 2026, 02:27
6,795
+10
29 Oct 2026, 10:45
6,785
-1
26 Oct 2026, 18:09
6,786
+11
23 Oct 2026, 10:30
6,775
+13
20 Oct 2026, 16:19
6,762
+3
18 Oct 2026, 01:17
6,759
-1
15 Oct 2026, 08:37
6,760
+6
12 Oct 2026, 12:26
6,754
+39
6 Oct 2026, 00:21
6,715
+112
28 Sept 2026, 15:16
6,603
+689
18 Sept 2026, 17:37
5,914
+142
14 Sept 2026, 04:57
5,772
+1
10 Sept 2026, 17:38
5,771
+15
5 Sept 2026, 15:36
5,756
+3
1 Sept 2026, 15:42
5,753
-5
29 Aug 2026, 14:35
5,758
+4
26 Aug 2026, 13:23
5,754
-6
23 Aug 2026, 17:52
5,760
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 6,822 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,110
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
17 (17 November 2025 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
2,110
Reactions total
86
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 16:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
31
Videos
12
Links
9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 08s
Average length
2m 08s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,216 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,181
97.1%
😁
35
2.88%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
إني لَأعذرُ أهلي في تنقُّلهم
بين المصائب إن لم يحفظوا الذِّمما
فقد يَسلُّ الأسى سُودَ الصنائع من
بِيضِ الطبائعِ حتى إن جرى هُضِما
همُ الذين إذا جاروا أَطعتُ بهم
عِلمي وحِلميَ لا خصمًا ولا حَكَما
سنَعدم الخطبَ إذ يُمنى إلى أجَلٍ
وينقضي الدهرُ لم نعدم به الرَّحِما
🇸🇾♥️
يقولون اتّقينا أن تبالي
متى حمل الثناءَ لها رسولُ
وقد نخشى الرجالَ على الغواني
فقلتُ: لنا وراءهمُ عقولُ
فقالوا: قال فيكِ الناسُ خيرًا
فقلت لهم: وسعدٌ، ما يقول؟
ألستَ فتايَ فاعلم بعد هذا
-ومنتقِصي حَسودٌ أو عَذولُ-
غزالُكَ دون رأيكَ في نُفورٍ
ودون أمينِ جانبِك الجُفولُ
ختمتَ على قَبولي بعد ودِّي
فما ودٌّ يُتاحُ ولا قَبولُ
قد جاء يمنح للدنيا فضائلَها
نورٌ من اللهِ مأذونٌ بلا حُجُبِ
إن قلتُ يا بأبي أفديكَ لستُ أرى
عِزَّ الفداء ولو أن كان خيرَ أبِ
أنّى! وشرّفتَ أنسابًا تشرِّفُنا
فأنت جوهر فخرِ العُرْب بالنَّسبِ
لم أقضِ حقَّ مديح فيك أنظِمهُ
ولو ضممتُ النجومَ الزُّهرَ بالشُّهبِ
يا منتهى أملي يا مرتجى عملي
يا مشتهى مُقلي.. تغلو المحبَّةُ بي!
صلى عليك إلهي قدرَ ما شملَتْ
خصائصٌ لك في الدارين من رُتبِ
أنعم بشيطانتي في الشعر إذ قسمَت
ليَ النّبوغَ وللحسّادِ وسواسا
أُدعى فأنظُر فيما ذيّلوه لكي
أُصيبَ رأسًا ولكن لم أجِد راسا
تجمّعوا ليقولوا بئس ما اتّبعت
من العصور، فما لي لا أرى الباسَا!
إن لم أكُ المتنبي كلَّه فلقد
ورثتُ من مجدِه أن أَشغلَ الناسَا :)
مشاهد التقطتها في طريقي بين الأزقة الدمشقية إلى دار نزار..
ما فرغتُ من تلك النزهة إلا وعقلي مشغولٌ بواحدة: "يا له عجبا أن يعيش المرء هنا ولا يقول الشعر!"
لله مِن مثوى بحيّ ثُعيلبٍ
لا كان ميمونًا ولا بمُبارَكِ
جاوزتُ حَرّةَ لؤمه بمدامعٍ
لو كنتَ شاهدَهنّ لم تتمالكِ
أو كنتَ تَعرفُ مثلَ شؤمِ نزولِه
فاجعله في عُنُقي وقل من فالكِ
ما زلتُ في عُودٍ رقيقٍ ناعمٍ
حتى بُليتُ بكلِّ صَلبٍ شائكِ
فلئن صَبرتُ فقد سَننتُ فضيلةً
في منزلٍ حاوي الرذائلِ حالِكِ
ولئن جَفوتُ فإنني لَحَريّةٌ
هذا ملامُ الناس خلفَ تماسُكي
مَن جاءني يشكو بعابسِ وجههِ
أقدارَهُ يرجِعْ هناك بضاحِكِ
ولئن جَزع…
أيا بلادًا حشاها الحُبُّ لو طَلعتْ
به على الناسِ ما أبقَتْ على شاني
تُسقى الخلائقُ في ألوانِ تُربتها
ندًى وعَدلًا فمن مُزْنٍ وميزانِ
تركتُ صُحبتَها يومًا فصاحبني
وجدٌ إلى القاعِ والأعلامِ والبانِ
يا أوحشَ اللهُ نفسي من أوانِسها
لو راق لي بَعدَها أُنْسٌ وألهاني
ما إنْ تَسلّت ذِمامي عنك أو نسيَتْ
والمرءُ ما بين سلوانٍ ونسيانِ
ولا قضى من لُبابِ الأُكْلِ منبتَهُ
لحمي ولا من عُبابِ الماء شرياني
كلما قرأت نازلة عاشوراء في آل رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، ومقتل سيدي ومولاي الحسين، ومشهد أمي زينب، اعتراني غضب وأسف وحنين لا يكون لسواها..
كأن الحادثة وقعت البارحة، وفاتك أن تدفع عنهم!
لله شأن أن جمع على خصمهم كل كبيرة موبقة لم يجمعها حتى على فرعون، إذ نجى الله منه موسى في هذا اليوم، فما اقترف قتل النبي، واقترف فيه هؤلاء -لعنهم الله- قتل سيد شباب الجنة، ريحانة رسول الله.
نحن بجاهكم وتحت ولايتكم وفي سوادكم،
الأحب…
لا تحسبي غزَلَ الرّجالِ حقيقةً
أو فاسلُكي ذُلُلا بكلّ خيالِ
حسْبُ المَطيَّةِ عَقْلُها يومًا لكي
تُمْطَى مُعوَّدةً بدون عِقالِ
إنّ الإناثَ لَبِالغُرورِ تَخصَّصت
مذ خُصِّص الذُّكرانُ بالدَّجالِ
❤100😁1
Signed مارية الرفاعي
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @marou7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @marou7 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
حذيفة العرجي @el_arje · 21,888 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Amir mounir -د أمير منير @amirmounir · 22,680 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
بلاغةٌ. @Balaghaton · 53,505 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
حُبَابَة• @Hobaba7 · 61,317 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
• حَرْفٌ | 🌸 @haref2 · 33,946 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
العمل من المنزل - Working From Home @workremotelyfreelance · 64,725 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
ماجدولين @Majdolin2023 · 27,439 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
تراث الأدب العربيّ @toratheladabelarabi · 36,636 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
رَوْضَةُ الأَدَبِ @Rawwda · 233,107 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ سَوْرَة المَرُوح” (@marou7), 6,822 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marou7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.