Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 19 of the 19 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 437 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -567. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,419–50,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 17:51
49,507
-8
9 Nov 2026, 04:11
49,515
-19
7 Nov 2026, 19:51
49,534
+16
6 Nov 2026, 18:30
49,518
-1
5 Nov 2026, 19:49
49,519
+13
4 Nov 2026, 19:00
49,506
-12
3 Nov 2026, 20:59
49,518
-15
2 Nov 2026, 22:29
49,533
+1
2 Nov 2026, 01:20
49,532
+3
1 Nov 2026, 03:26
49,529
+3
31 Oct 2026, 01:31
49,526
+16
30 Oct 2026, 03:39
49,510
-18
29 Oct 2026, 04:50
49,528
-16
28 Oct 2026, 04:21
49,544
-25
27 Oct 2026, 04:17
49,569
-9
26 Oct 2026, 01:39
49,578
-19
25 Oct 2026, 01:27
49,597
-6
24 Oct 2026, 03:28
49,603
+16
23 Oct 2026, 05:06
49,587
+11
22 Oct 2026, 04:38
49,576
first reading
Engagement
806 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 256 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.46%
avg views ÷ 49,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,700
237 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
237
of 806 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 237 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
806 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
640,762
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈75
Links
≈56
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 44s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 806 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sarsrt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 806 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 237 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
متبقي من الحالة 1100 جنيه
ممكن همتكم معانا فضلا ع نجمع المبلغ النهارده
(كُلُّ امْرِئٍ في ظِلِّ صَدَقَتِهِ حَتَّى يُفْصَلَ بَيْنَ النَّاسِ).
رقم الكاش← 01026706467
من الأبيات التي كانت تعجب الأستاذ محمود شاكر رحمه الله وكان يخبر بها طلابه في جلسات قراءته ودروسه، قول بشار بن برد:
«فَاِسكُن إِلى سَكَنٍ تُسَرُّ بِهِ
ذَهَبَ الزَمانُ وَأَنتَ مُنفَرِدُ
قَد شابَ رَأسُكَ في تَذَكُّرِها
وَهَفا الفِراقُ وَرَقَّتِ الكَبِدُ»
أبيات تجلّد قارءها والله!
رحم الله الأستاذ وغفر له.
البُعد الذي يُعرف نهايته هيّن
ولا يحزن من يعرف ويثق متىٰ يرى حبيبه!
قال شاعر:
«وهوَّنَ ما ألقى من البعدِ
أنَّني على أمَلٍ أن اللقاءَ قريبُ»
وقال المتنبي قديمًا:
وَما صَبابَةُ مُشتاقٍ عَلى أَمَلٍ
مِنَ الـلِقاءِ كَمُشتاقٍ بِـلا أَمَلِ!
وصدق.. ليسوا سواء!
'))
صبَاحُ الخَير..
«مَن أوكلَ اللّه يومًا بعض حاجته
أتتهُ حـاجـاتـهُ فوقَ الذي أمِـــــلا»
Showing the 12 most recent of 806 posts we hold for @sarsrt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sarsrt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 October 2026
Most recent edit
3 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 74 posts on @sarsrt as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
23
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ضَيّ @Daii2020 · 81,601 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
المجاز @Almgaz · 29,266 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
أنتَ تستَطِيع _ 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒂𝒏. @You_Can21 · 39,384 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
ألِف @aleff1 · 52,372 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
طَاقَةُ بِالمُوجَب - الرسمية @Taqat_bialmujab · 67,388 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
أَدِيبْ 💛 @adeeb82 · 47,436 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
بَليغٌ @balighoun9 · 87,701 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
صَحٍيف @saahef · 98,123 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
أَرِيبٌ. @areeb5 · 19,884 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
رِفْقٌ _ Rifq @Rifq1997 · 25,641 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
قَبَسٌ• @qabs97 · 35,415 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Serenità. @serenityeg · 32,784 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
ماجدولين @Majdolin2023 · 27,443 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
مَلاذُ الشُعَرَاء @Malaz_Alsh3raa · 51,625 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
المُصْحَف @ALMoshaf_Q · 34,717 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
أسانسير إلي الجنة 💛 @asansir_ala_aljana · 65,012 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
تعلم مع د/محمد الغليظ @Elghalez · 45,332 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
The sun will rise and we will try again @simple_details · 89,548 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
مركز البسمة الشبابي|غزة🇵🇸 @albasma1ps · 21,334 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
سُهَاد🖤|• @Elowen_27 · 23,290 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
فصيح @Faasee7 · 136,428 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
تذكير بالله @votojrav · 66,116 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
زَيْنَبْ مُحَمَّدْ إِبْرَاهِيم..𐚁̸ @jou_zeinabmohamedibrahim · 32,392 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
رَوْضَةُ الأَدَبِ @Rawwda · 233,107 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ثرثرات ♡” (@sarsrt), 49,507 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarsrt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
