Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,788–16,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 21:01
16,812
-13
15 Sept 2026, 17:55
16,825
+13
14 Sept 2026, 05:15
16,812
-9
12 Sept 2026, 11:36
16,821
+4
10 Sept 2026, 09:41
16,817
-14
7 Sept 2026, 06:59
16,831
-13
4 Sept 2026, 16:38
16,844
-2
3 Sept 2026, 00:19
16,846
-7
1 Sept 2026, 23:06
16,853
-1
31 Aug 2026, 21:09
16,854
-12
31 Aug 2026, 00:25
16,866
-2
29 Aug 2026, 03:14
16,868
-14
28 Aug 2026, 00:04
16,882
-7
27 Aug 2026, 02:06
16,889
-1
26 Aug 2026, 03:42
16,890
-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:24
16,893
-6
23 Aug 2026, 18:18
16,899
-11
22 Aug 2026, 01:58
16,910
-3
20 Aug 2026, 16:02
16,913
-6
19 Aug 2026, 16:48
16,919
first reading
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.53%
avg views ÷ 16,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
64 (18 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
25,236
Reactions total
798
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14m 46s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,038 reactions across 63 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,348
44.4%
😁
543
17.9%
🔥
409
13.5%
🤣
236
7.77%
🥰
140
4.61%
👍
107
3.52%
💯
99
3.26%
🤩
43
1.42%
🏆
25
0.823%
🕊
14
0.461%
👏
11
0.362%
🍾
10
0.329%
💔
9
0.296%
🦄
9
0.296%
🆒
8
0.263%
🌚
8
0.263%
⚡
5
0.165%
🗿
4
0.132%
😍
3
0.099%
🤯
3
0.099%
3 further kinds
4
0.132%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,038 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#историяслов неожиданная для первого сентября.
Английское school пришло через древнеанглийский и латынь от греческого scholē. И означало это слово первоначально «свободное время» или «досуг».
Но для древних греков свободное время было не только возможностью лежать и смотреть в потолок. Его можно было тратить на размышления, беседы, учёбу, спорт. Постепенно слово стало обозначать сначала учёную беседу, а потом и мес…
Первого сентября моя собственная онлайн-школа совершенно бесполезна.
В rockme я принимаю решения: кого брать в команду, как давать обратную связь, что делать, если ученику непонятно. Там я могу на многое повлиять.
А рядом с собственными детьми роль меняется. Я не выбираю учителя, не знаю заранее, как сложатся отношения, и не могу всё проконтролировать.
Оценки вообще не главное для меня — хочется, чтобы рядом были …
Вчера я попросила вас принести слова, которые вы знаете, но стараетесь не произносить, и вот наши сегодняшние герои:
1. CONSCIENTIOUS
Не так страшен коншиеншес как его малюют! Главное не пытаться прочитать каждую букву, и не забыть поставить ударение на EN: con-shi-EN-shus.
She’s a conscientious student.
2. ENTREPRENEUR
Когда в язык «нагадили» французы)) Здесь всё держится на последнем слоге: on-truh-pruh-NUR. Перв…
Вот и всё 😭
Знаете, есть такие моменты, когда чувствуешь, что делаешь что-то важное и прекрасное. Вчера был именно такой день: у девятого потока Rock Your Pronunciation PRO был выпускной! 🎉
Позади больше 40 уроков, бесчисленное количество созвонов и индивидуальной работы, challenges, провалы и победы - невероятный путь, длиной в 4.5 месяца. И вот вчера на экране были те же котики, с которыми мы встретились в апреле…
Какое английское слово вы знаете, но стараетесь не произносить вслух?
Напишите в комментах просто одно слово, без транскрипции и объяснений. Завтра выберу до трёх из комментариев и покажу голосом, как они звучат отдельно и внутри фразы. Cheers!
Вам тоже неловко перед русскоязычными за красивый акцент?
Да, есть немного52%
Нет, говорю со всеми одинаково21%
Вообще не задумываюсь30%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Такой комментарий от подписчика сегодня вам принесла. Причем ОНИ здесь не про англоговорящих, а про русскоязычных.
Я периодически слышу о том, что человеку неловко говорить с красивым произношением перед своими. У вас тоже такое есть?
Я часто слышу: «Я плохо понимаю английский на слух». Но это слишком факинг общее описание. Примерно как прийти к врачу со словами: «Доктор, мне не очень, но где болит не знаю»
Потому что под этим «не понимаю» могут скрываться совершенно разные вещи:
Например, вы слушаете фразу несколько раз, ничего не понимаете, включаете субтитры - а там внезапно знакомые слова. Просто в быстрой речи они слились в одно: whaddayago…
❤30👍6💯5🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @dnevnik_phonetix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вам тоже неловко перед русскоязычными за красивый акцент?
Да, есть немного52%
Нет, говорю со всеми одинаково21%
Вообще не задумываюсь30%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Virginia Bēowulf | английский язык @v_beowulf · 39,858 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Hopkins English @hopkinsenglish · 33,264 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Гапонова и её английский @gaponova · 22,639 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 September 2026
My English WAY @my_englishway · 23,045 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
Английский с Ириной Кузьминой @englishkuzmina · 28,860 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневник фонетистки” (@dnevnik_phonetix), 16,812 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnevnik_phonetix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.