Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52401366197044598613,470custom 5463035762985409669375custom 524267782729945034066custom 546328801929960554530🔥26custom 528740173406956214121🤡12👎2

Channel
@jolynews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
209,359subscribers
-123 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001770875143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jolynews |
| Description | Мемы, новости и чатик. Приватка с кучей контента: https://web.tribute.tg/l/18g Мой VPN @net4ebur_bot Предложить новость/реклама @AlexShevtsov_Bot |
| Created | 7 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jolynews |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 209,359 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 209,375 | +65 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 209,310 | -22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 209,332 | -65 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 209,397 | -89 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 209,486 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 209,482 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (18 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,764,300 |
| Reactions total | 202,181 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
202,181 reactions across 33 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5240136619704459861 | 106,623 | 52.7% | |
| 🤡 | 28,676 | 14.2% | |
| 🔥 | 25,310 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5463035762985409669 | 24,459 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5242677827299450340 | 6,537 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5287401734069562141 | 5,130 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5463288019299605545 | 4,354 | 2.15% | |
| 👎 | 1,092 | 0.54% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202,181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jolynews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52401366197044598613,470custom 5463035762985409669375custom 524267782729945034066custom 546328801929960554530🔥26custom 528740173406956214121🤡12👎2
Россияне и евреи — наименее желательные национальности для англичан.
custom 52401366197044598615,550custom 5463288019299605545352🤡267🔥105custom 524267782729945034051custom 546303576298540966950custom 528740173406956214120👎3
Главные доноры американских ВУЗов
custom 54632880192996055452,900custom 5240136619704459861251🔥115custom 546303576298540966950custom 524267782729945034029🤡25👎2custom 52874017340695621412
Зенитный ракетный комплекс ближнего радиуса действия «Avenger» обеспечивает охрану Дональда Трампа во время игры в гольф.
custom 52426778272994503403,650custom 52401366197044598611,470custom 5463035762985409669302🔥74🤡60custom 546328801929960554516👎5custom 52874017340695621411
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52401366197044598615,270custom 5463288019299605545173🔥80custom 524267782729945034031custom 546303576298540966920🤡17custom 528740173406956214110👎3
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52401366197044598615,000custom 5463035762985409669478custom 5242677827299450340101custom 546328801929960554546🤡27👎25custom 528740173406956214117🔥7
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52401366197044598616,030custom 5463035762985409669683custom 5287401734069562141120🤡42custom 524267782729945034038custom 546328801929960554516🔥14👎5
«Яблоко» обжалует решение Верховного суда о снятии с выборов, сообщает пресс-служба партии. ___ Так что не делайте поспешных выводов!
custom 52401366197044598616,640🔥442🤡178custom 546328801929960554594custom 528740173406956214164custom 546303576298540966947custom 524267782729945034038👎14
Верховный суд РФ снял партию "Яблоко" с выборов в Госдуму 😂
🤡6,730custom 52401366197044598612,870custom 5287401734069562141369👎139custom 546303576298540966970custom 524267782729945034049🔥16custom 546328801929960554513
Производители Patriot отказываются передавать Украине лицензии на производство ракет-перехватчиков — The Atlantic. Raytheon и Lockheed объясняют это риском кражи интеллектуальной собственности. На деле их беспокоит, что украинцы улучшат Patriot, начнут массовое производство и будут продавать их значительно дешевле.
🤡4,840custom 52401366197044598611,470custom 5287401734069562141150custom 524267782729945034084🔥82custom 546303576298540966940custom 546328801929960554531👎13
«Веселого молочника» выгоняют из страны после критики властей Американский фермер Джастас Уолкер, известный как «Веселый молочник», заявил, что власти потребовали от него и его семьи покинуть Россию. Уолкер живет на Алтае, развивает ферму и много лет был одним из любимых героев российского ТВ — его показывали как американца, который «выбрал Россию» и добился успеха здесь. Но после критики Минсельхоза все изменилос…
custom 52401366197044598616,220custom 5463035762985409669575👎195custom 5287401734069562141119custom 524267782729945034047🤡45🔥35custom 546328801929960554510
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52401366197044598615,400🔥279custom 5242677827299450340102custom 546303576298540966919custom 528740173406956214112custom 54632880192996055457🤡5👎4
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @jolynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 38,902 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 133 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вестник Шевцова” (@jolynews), 209,359 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jolynews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.