Новое видео, в коллабе с Никитой и его проектом Wissensgau. Приятного просмотра! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWInqhSUfjg ____
🔥103❤44👍24🤯5

Channel
@wissensgau
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,659subscribers
+1,357 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002919919057 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wissensgau |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wissensgau |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 5,659 | +63 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 5,596 | +21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 5,575 | +80 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 5,495 | +85 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:35 | 5,410 | +86 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 5,324 | +119 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 5,205 | +110 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 5,095 | +313 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 4,782 | +358 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 4,424 | +122 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 4,302 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,339 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 645 | 48.2% | |
| 🔥 | 367 | 27.4% | |
| 👍 | 285 | 21.3% | |
| 👏 | 28 | 2.09% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 0.896% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.075% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.075% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новое видео, в коллабе с Никитой и его проектом Wissensgau. Приятного просмотра! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWInqhSUfjg ____
🔥103❤44👍24🤯5
Многим кажется, что образование множественного числа в немецком не имеет никакой логики. Kinder, Gärten, Autos, Freunde, Fahrten — ощущение такое, что во всём этом многообразии форм вообще нет никакой структуры. 😔 На самом деле есть. Она становится очевидна, если понять, какие процессы имели место в немецком языке в древности. В новом файле я представил образование множественного числа в немецком как логичную сист…
❤69👍33🔥19
Как часто вам приходится гуглить правила по немецкому? Снова и снова перерывать учебники, искать нужные разделы? И всё это зачастую ради одной таблички или сноски. Я уже давно начал думать, как бы упростить моим ученикам этот аспект изучения. Для этого я долго копил и структурировал все правила в одном файле. В итоге теперь, когда всё самое важное уже собрано в одном месте, мне достаточно сделать буквально пару клик…
🔥98❤47👍17😁1
Спешу всех обрадовать, что работа над моими образовательными материалами завершена. 😊 Уверен, что результат понравится всем: и любителям копнуть в историю и этимологию, и простым изучающим немецкий. Подробнее про каждый из файлов расскажу завтра и послезавтра. Покажу, как там всё будет выглядеть :)
❤127🔥51👍35👏9🤯1
🏰 Как появилась фрактура — и почему от неё в итоге отказались Если вы держали в руках старую немецкую книгу или письмо начала XX века, то наверняка видели этот угловатый, «ломаный» шрифт, который современному глазу читается с трудом. Это — фрактура (Fraktur), самый узнаваемый представитель немецкого готического письма. 📜 Что такое фрактура Фрактура относится к группе gebrochene Schriften — «ломаных шрифтов»: кругл…
👍84❤61🔥10🤯2👏1
Grüß Gott! Начал работу параллельно над вторым образовательным файлом. На этот раз не общего характера, а по более узкой тематике: про образование множественного числа у немецких существительных. Этот материал будет полезен для тех, кто хочет разобраться, по какой вообще логике множественное число образуется. Хочу внести структурное понимание для достаточно хаотичной темы, так что в файле в том числе будет блок с ли…
❤123🔥50👍37👏1
Всем привет! Спасибо большое за фидбек под последним рилсом! Я даже немного удивился, насколько много людей написали, что хотели бы заиметь учебные материалы под моим авторством. Что ж, вот я и сел за работу! Пожелайте мне удачи :)
❤174👍55🔥36👏17🤯4✍1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @wissensgau. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wissensgau” (@wissensgau), 5,659 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wissensgau.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.