10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,278–34,433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 12:17
34,415
+32
12 Aug 2026, 09:14
34,383
+8
11 Aug 2026, 08:43
34,375
+25
10 Aug 2026, 07:04
34,350
+3
9 Aug 2026, 09:13
34,347
+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:15
34,346
+8
7 Aug 2026, 11:00
34,338
+40
6 Aug 2026, 09:41
34,298
+2
6 Aug 2026, 01:50
34,296
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:02
34,296
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 34,415 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,210
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
26 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
239,430
Reactions total
4,651
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,287 reactions across 23 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,535
35.8%
🔥
759
17.7%
😁
587
13.7%
❤🔥
382
8.91%
👍
338
7.88%
👀
218
5.09%
😇
212
4.95%
🤯
84
1.96%
💯
34
0.793%
🤔
30
0.7%
😱
15
0.35%
🎉
14
0.327%
🤣
13
0.303%
💔
11
0.257%
🦄
10
0.233%
👏
8
0.187%
🤩
8
0.187%
🤪
8
0.187%
👌
4
0.093%
🗿
4
0.093%
7 further kinds
13
0.303%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,651reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А что это тут у нас? Новая гиперфиксация?
Мы только за: сами пересмотрели всё, что можно, после нового блокбастера Нолана. Останавливаться не собираемся, поэтому предлагаем вам прочитать, а возможно, и перечитать «Одиссею» Гомера с прекрасной Анастасией Золотухиной.
Пройдем путь Одиссея от Трои до Итаки, познакомимся с разными переводами и будем получать интеллектуальное удовольствие от гомеровского текста.
Ну, вс…
Кровосмешарики, братья, сестры и ГАБСБУРГИ
Мы не могли упустить возможность провести конкурс мемов по самой мемной династии! Условия как всегда до невозможности просты, а подарки — прекрасны!
Возьмите предложенный или любой другой портрет, картину, фотографию кого-то из династии Габсбургов и сделате мем! Создателю самой смешной картинки подарим новый замечательный курс Сергея Луняшина «Габсбурги: история Европы в з…
Печатный станок Гутенберга снова в деле (и умещается в кармане).
Независимые издательства объединились и выпустили приложение-читалку «Переплет» — онлайн-библиотеку тамиздата. Внутри — более 100 книг, изданных за пределами России (тех самых, которые сейчас не сыскать ни на одной ярмарке, даже если переодеться странствующим купцом). В каталоге — FRESH Verlag, «Бабель», Vidim Books, ISIA Media, Uberbau, «Историческая …
Дохристианская древность в мемориалах эпохи модернизма
Привет, с вами Лев Масиель Санчес.
В эпоху позднего модернизма в мировой архитектуре намечается возврат к национальным и историческим образам. Для многих народов Советского союза они были в первую очередь связаны с христианским периодом их истории, что было политически нежелательным. Поэтому в Армении и Грузии архитекторы и скульпторы стали часто обращаться к д…
Мы не знаем, были ли на Древней Руси детские книжки. Но точно знаем, кто был бы их иллюстратором!
Конечно — Онфим! Новгородский мальчик лет шести-семи, живший в середине XIII века. Вспомним легендарные рисунки, предсказавшие лаги нейросетей.
На одном из рисунков Онфим изобразил себя всадником, протыкающим копьём поверженного врага, и подписал: «Онфиме», чтобы никто не сомневался, кто тут герой. Ещё у него есть воин…
Какая же свадьба без драки?
Варфоломеевская ночь, Париж, Маргарита Валуа из династии Медичей выходит за Генриха Наваррского, а гостей-гугенотов вырезают прямо посреди торжества.
Стоп, подождите. Это не та свадьба! Точнее не те Медичи!
Ту парижскую резню 1572 года устроила Екатерина Медичи. А мы зовём вас во Флоренцию, на семнадцать лет позже и куда веселее: на свадьбу Фердинанда Медичи и Кристины Лотарингской 1589…
А принесли мы вам интереснейшую историю от Алексея Мунипова!
Совсем скоро мы отправляемся в экспедицию по Парижу с новым проектом «Атлас»! Если хотите узнать, где рождались идеи, которые изменили искусство ХХ века, и как потом «гадость» стала шедевром, выставляющимся в музеях, то вам в Париж с нами и Алексеем Муниповым!
Посмотреть программу
🌱 Подписаться на Страдариум
Telegram | Рассылка | Ветка
Что-то давно тут не было кружочков!
100 реакций и мы принесём вам кое-что интересное…
🌱 Подписаться на Страдариум
Telegram | Рассылка | Ветка
❤125❤🔥29👀28🔥20👍8👌4😁2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @stradarium1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
отгрызает себе тестикулы (мужские половые железы…) и бросает охотнику, чтобы те гнались за ними45%
плюётся мускусом, отбивающим у собак нюх20%
прикидывается камнем8%
заводит преследователей в свою плотину и там их сгрызает6%
откусывает себе хвост и уплывает8%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,232 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Страдающее Средневековье @pophistory · 140,614 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Тут картины показываем @artgallery · 196,557 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Людмила Петрановская @lpetranovskaya · 169,390 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Страдариум” (@stradarium1), 34,415 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stradarium1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.