★ Rated R — американская киношная метка, которая сообщает зрителю примерно следующее: «Детишки, дальше будут мат, секс, кровища или прочие взрослые развлечения». Но вопреки популярному переводу, R - это не совсем 18+. В США зрители младше 17 лет могут смотреть такой фильм, если пришли с родителем или взрослым сопровождающим. А вот NC-17 уже означает: никаких детей, даже с мамой, папой и письменным разрешением хоть са…

Channel
Fucking English | Английский 18+
@fuckingenglish
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
314,879subscribers
-1,380 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001108096376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fuckingenglish |
| Description | Авторский блог о нецензурном английском. По рекламе: @croco Цены на рекламу: @zvenzbot Наш уютный чат: @fuckingflood Купить на бирже: telega.in/c/fuckingenglish |
| Created | 1 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fuckingenglish |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 314,879 | -297 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 315,176 | -121 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 315,297 | -141 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 315,438 | -151 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 315,589 | -188 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 315,777 | -137 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 315,914 | -150 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 316,064 | -135 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 316,199 | -60 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 316,259 | first reading |
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.84%
- avg views ÷ 314,879 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,500
- 42 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 42
- of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (21 July 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 903,990 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 168
- Videos
- 871
- Links
- 829
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3m 57s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 42 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fuckingenglish. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
📊 80% учеников, начавших подготовку в августе, уже к зиме получают заветные баллы А ты всё ещё думаешь, что до экзаменов далеко? 👀 Сейчас самое время начать. Если сдаёшь ОГЭ/ЕГЭ в 2027, подписывайся на преподов Умскул по своим предметам и начинай готовиться 👇🏻 📚 11 класс 📚 10 класс 📚 9 класс 📚 СШ А если хочешь сделать подготовку еще эффективнее - переходи в летнюю школу Умскул — бесплатный курс, который преврати…
★ Royal pain — никакой голубой крови и приступов подагры. «Королевской болью» называют человека, вещь или занятие, которые настолько действуют на нервы, что одно их упоминание уже слегка портит настроение. Здесь royal работает как усилитель: не просто pain, а прямо-таки «царская заноза в заднице». Часто встречаются более полные варианты a royal pain in the ass и помягче - a royal pain in the neck. По-русски это может…
Video, posted without a caption
💎 Telegram-native casino. Быстро. Приватно. Без лимитов. @WinGram
★ Bang to rights — поймать с поличным, уличить или припереть доказательствами так, что включать дурачка уже поздно. Представь: ночью кто-то регулярно пиздит твою колбасу из холодильника. И вот однажды ты заходишь на кухню, а сосед стоит перед открытой дверцей с батоном в одной руке и твоей докторской в другой. Поздравляем: засранец caught bang to rights - доказательная база буквально у него во рту. Выражение особенно…
Chutzpah - это...
- излишняя скромность13%
- поразительная наглость53%
- оскорбительная пошлость33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как по-китайски привет?
★ The feminine urge — «тот самый женский порыв» или мемная формула, которой в интернете иронично объясняют внезапное, странное, драматичное или до смешного жизненное желание девушек что-нибудь учудить. Схема простая: the feminine urge to + действие. Например, the feminine urge to text your ex at 2 a.m. - «женский порыв написать бывшему в два часа ночи». Причём действие вообще не обязано быть объективно «женским»: в э…
★ Jonesing — когда тебе чего-то хочется не просто «ну было бы неплохо», а до состояния «дайте мне это немедленно, и тогда никто не пострадает». Обычно говорят be jonesing for something - «дико хотеть», «жаждать», «испытывать сильную тягу». Сегодня jonesing можно сказать про кофе, бургер, секс, отпуск или новую серию любимого шоу. Причём слово хорошо передаёт именно навязчивое желание, когда ты уже не просто хочешь ко…
⚡️ Тираж ограничен. Потом не нойте. Ozon — https://ozon.ru/t/NBz2H5H Wildberries — https://clck.ru/3EyFat
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @fuckingenglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Chutzpah - это...
- излишняя скромность13%
- поразительная наглость53%
- оскорбительная пошлость33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 201,259 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@fuck_otziv · 219 postsОтзывы.
@tut_otziv · 1212 postsАнглийский для лентяев
@lazy_teaches · 28,6709 postsAll Telegram
@alltg · 5,5305 postsMash
@mash · 3,111,0955 postsОтзывы «Фотоаппарат»
@photo_otziv · 14 postsEnglishAd
@EnglishAd19 · 31 postfucking media
@pricereklama · 461 postБиржа рекламы в Telegram
@Reklamizer · 191 postСорока изучает | Иностранные языки
@sorokatn_izuchaet · 1771 postsubNovost_reklama
@subNovost_reklama · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hot_idioms · 54,822#1
@english2020easy · 243,178#2
@ieltstoeflcefrr · 65,541#3
@unchildish_english · 41,877#4
@katy_english · 5,522#5
@seriesenglishhh · 98,894#6
@Factura_Shop · 30,749#7
@dvachannel · 938,303#8
@pezduzalive · 375,173#9
@pekagame · 1,100,656#10
@pravdadirty · 1,372,744#11
@exploitex · 2,041,641#12
@ru2ch · 637,904#13
@retra · 165,350#14
@spaceofeng · 126,908#15
@why4ch · 1,061,618#16
@ateobreaking · 646,465#17
@whackdoor · 1,649,581#18
@uzmdk · 201,077#19
@moscowach · 4,264,158#20
@moscowmap · 2,720,229#21
@Lepragram · 342,398#22
@naebnet · 2,190,899#23
@TgEmojis · 1,662,714#24
@rhymestg · 1,411,308#25
@temalebedev · 968,829#26
@Reddit · 163,329#27
@wylsared · 1,083,664#28
@femalememes · 414,792#29
@yaplakal · 423,715#30
@br1anm7ps · 1,085,927#31
@rozetked · 667,402#32
@bloodysx · 1,151,356#33
@leoday · 5,505,568#34
@kontext_channel · 830,139#35
@cbpub · 637,405#36
@sale_caviar · 193,068#37
@test_dot · 526,559#38
@petrovtel · 528,825#39
@nmshhub · 707,085#40
@lider · 158,764#41
@bankrollo · 451,372#42
@pikabu · 256,891#43
@WebcamDictionary · 5,744#44
@media1337 · 1,184,391#45
@oplata_skoro_budet · 359,192#46
@EnglishBestChannel · 163,805#47
@mudak · 539,077#48
@rhymesrim · 302,376#49
@bugfeature · 592,291#50
@klientvsprav · 1,082,399#51
@trendwatching24 · 1,496,193#52
@sndkgram · 353,751#53
@trends · 1,104,726#54
@lifeyt · 332,179#55
@toplesofficial · 523,479#56
@msk_live · 1,821,142#57
@moscowtinderr · 719,856#58
@concertzaal · 839,500#59
@anglyskyi_yazyk · 84,045#60
@twitt_ota · 335,549#61
@mash · 3,111,095#62
@bbbreaking · 1,971,978#63
@meduzalive · 1,114,271#64
@bazabazon · 1,543,310#65
@varlamov_news · 1,051,691#66
@jolybells · 359,654#67
@lentachold · 382,397#68
@nevzorovtv · 1,006,392#69
@yurydud · 841,599#70
@stalin_gulag · 302,644#71
@pressauz · 293,778#72
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,608,666#73
@banksta · 437,402#74
@jolynews · 209,199#75
@trolluz · 78,770#76
@oldlentach · 263,246#77
@kinopoisk · 814,043#78
@nexta_live · 761,179#79
@lachentyt · 1,562,154#80
@vanek_nikolaev · 2,667,294#81
@ejdailyru · 643,236#82
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 920,886#83
@koshkii_kotiki · 343,477#84
@ekaterina_mizulina · 925,106#85
@luka_ebkov · 429,486#86
@eschulmann · 306,448#87
@d_code · 383,179#88
@DKNASASAL · 395,636#89
@mazellovvv · 435,573#90
@TheBadComedian · 599,920#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@english2020easy · 243,178
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@seriesenglishhh · 98,894
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@Lingvaa · 138,291
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
@state_english · 238,624
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@lexicona · 287,418
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@EnglishBestChannel · 163,805
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@ruGrammar · 122,106
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@skyengweekly · 128,637
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
@spaceofeng · 126,908
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@lektorium20 · 115,949
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@SilaSlov · 118,118
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@philosophicaI_thoughts · 123,255
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@free_edu · 310,840
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@flibusta_anglysky · 371,728
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@auto_inspektor · 215,397
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@south_work · 132,416
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@horseatwork · 135,404
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@eruditurl24 · 98,160
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
@AphorismTG · 109,308
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@hacks_excel · 285,354
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@Buddy_music · 631,964
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026
@auto_instruktor · 449,498
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@deutschonline · 122,820
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
@google_trends2 · 402,101
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fucking English | Английский 18+” (@fuckingenglish), 314,879 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuckingenglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.