Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
19 measurements spanning 72 days, net +173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,550–6,794 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 14:00
6,757
-2
4 Nov 2026, 23:17
6,759
-1
1 Nov 2026, 14:44
6,760
-4
30 Oct 2026, 01:16
6,764
-2
27 Oct 2026, 01:26
6,766
+8
23 Oct 2026, 21:04
6,758
+9
20 Oct 2026, 18:40
6,749
+6
18 Oct 2026, 02:16
6,743
+8
14 Oct 2026, 15:59
6,735
+10
11 Oct 2026, 04:59
6,725
-1
5 Oct 2026, 00:21
6,726
+24
26 Sept 2026, 06:18
6,702
+117
17 Sept 2026, 16:36
6,585
+7
13 Sept 2026, 11:59
6,578
-14
9 Sept 2026, 13:17
6,592
+5
4 Sept 2026, 02:00
6,587
+9
31 Aug 2026, 08:47
6,578
-5
28 Aug 2026, 05:05
6,583
-1
27 Aug 2026, 23:45
6,584
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
38.3%
avg views ÷ 6,757 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,590
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
47 (9 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
69,903
Reactions total
1,968
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 15:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
436
Videos
41
Links
23
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,624 reactions across 47 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,446
39.9%
😁
527
14.5%
❤
524
14.5%
🔥
312
8.61%
✍
163
4.50%
🤓
113
3.12%
🤣
101
2.79%
😱
64
1.77%
💊
52
1.43%
🍾
43
1.19%
💯
39
1.08%
🥴
33
0.911%
😢
24
0.662%
🤨
16
0.442%
🍓
15
0.414%
👌
15
0.414%
🗿
14
0.386%
😭
14
0.386%
🙊
13
0.359%
🤯
13
0.359%
17 further kinds
83
2.29%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,624 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (44.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вышло новое видео сами знаете где. Если вы до сих пор не умеете говорить, что что-то сломалось, а заменяете все на was broken, то вам будет полезно.
Отдельно хочу напомнить, что у всех разные особенности восприятия информации. Поэтому если вам быстро или медленно или жарко или холодно, используйте современные технологии 21 века в вашем приложении, чтобы настроить под себя.
Collins Dictionary назвал ‘mogging’ словом года!
Для тех, кто из села 😁, объясняю, mogging [произносится как бульонный кубик одной известной фирмы на распев ä] означает outshine / outperform кого-либо - превзойти (любые глаголы, начинающиеся с приставки пере или пре в русс яз). Ну или мóгнуть, по-русски. Это сленг. Но это не простой сленг. В англофонном мире его используют как подростки, так и молодые миллениалы и п…
There’s a coffee shop in SanFran that charges $105 for a cup of Joe ☕️ from Japan.
A CNN reporter did a blind test where there was a $6 cup and the expensive one. The winner?Well, he picked the cheaper coffee.
Would you shell out $105 for a coffee? How much would you tip?
По размеру от меньшего к большему прилагательные выше для наглядности полезно записать в ряд:
huge/gigantic ———> enormous ————> gargantuan
Проверьте свои знания и сделайте такое же упражнение с прилагательным upset.
Если вы видите could, не думайте, что это прошедшее время! Форма глагола может не совпадать с его смыслом!
В примере выше could используется в настоящем / будущем времени, но использует для этого форму прошедшего времени. Зачем, спросите вы. Просто в английском языке нет других инструментов грамматических, что бы передать гипотетическое что-то.
[могут победить гипотетически = could win]
Заметьте, что can win имеет и…
А теперь возьмите баночку вашего санскрина, зубную пасту, порошка и тд и изучите подробно! Отчеты и мета-анализы с спектральным анализом присылайте мне на почту! 📚😁
😁31👍10🍓4💊2🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @kirills_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @kirills_english as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5
Polls
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
“I moved up my flu shot appointment.” Does it mean they are getting the shot ______
sooner54%
later46%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
English from London @thegap_club · 36,913 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Dave_englishbad @dave_englishbad · 21,789 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
ВОТ ЭТО английский @votetoang · 24,225 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Hopkins English @hopkinsenglish · 32,869 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
LinguaTrip @linguatrip_channel · 34,017 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
Real English. Таня Маркова @bk_gko · 44,599 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Virginia Bēowulf | английский язык @v_beowulf · 40,603 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Иван Матюхин @ivnmat · 32,613 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kirills_English” (@kirills_english), 6,757 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kirills_english.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.