Channel
@vasiileevaa
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,228subscribers
+86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001765365028 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vasiileevaa |
| Description | eastern europe expert. верховный группы: @vasileevam предложка в сообщения канала |
| Created | 19 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vasiileevaa |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
29,500 average views per post against 20,228 subscribers — an engagement rate of 145.7%. Across the 23,171 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.51% and 23.5%, with a median of 11.7%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 530,520 |
| Mature posts only | 145.7% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 20,228 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:rus · 23,171 channels · p10 2.54% · p25 5.51% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.5% · p90 42.3% |
| Position in cohort | 99.763th percentile · 12.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.144% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 20,228 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 20,223 | +72 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 20,151 | +25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 20,126 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 20,125 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 20,131 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 20,137 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 20,142 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 20,142 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (5 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 565,860 |
| Reactions total | 15,531 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20,311 reactions across 24 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 10,126 | 49.9% | |
| 😭 | 3,294 | 16.2% | |
| 🤣 | 2,107 | 10.4% | |
| ❤ | 1,785 | 8.79% | |
| custom 5427293577724048961 | 1,462 | 7.20% | |
| 😨 | 560 | 2.76% | |
| 🌭 | 531 | 2.61% | |
| 💅 | 147 | 0.724% | |
| 🙏 | 131 | 0.645% | |
| 💘 | 45 | 0.222% | |
| 🤓 | 36 | 0.177% | |
| 😈 | 28 | 0.138% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 0.133% | |
| ✍ | 13 | 0.064% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 0.049% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 0.044% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vasiileevaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
имагинировали как дугин сидит целыми днями заебывает алису AI и гигачат вопросами про то почему тунтунтун сахур поругался с бомбардиро крокодило потому что никто не хочет с ним разговаривать
😁472😭78custom 542729357772404896148🤓7
Photo, posted without a caption
😁454🤣138🌭28❤9
максим кац срочно переключайся на надувание новых людей. может когда их снимут тогда ебучий владислав даванков перестанет делать рекламу в т. н. молодежном телеграм канале ДВАЧ с посылом вроде владислав даванков предложил запретить не совсем, а только чуть-чуть (ну поняли наш слон тоесть)
❤419😁226custom 542729357772404896184🙏18
1629й день сво. с выборов за сделанную чатомжпт картинку сняли партию яблоко которая ни разу за 23 года не набрала порог 5%. добавьте это в егэ по истории пж
❤617😁255😭160🤣33
любовные истории в восточной европе:
❤464😁244💅93💘45
сука заседание о снятии яблока с выборов это самый топовый стендап который я видела
😁675🤣216custom 5427293577724048961102🌭13
Александр Плющев пожаловался на хейт из-за сходства с колобком Он рассказал, что в комментариях на прямых эфирах Эха хейтеры ругаются на него, потому что думают, что из-за него перенесли премьеру «Человека-паука»
😁633🤣207❤30💅16
Московское садовое товарищество «МосСад» Футболки «МосСад» Размеры: S-4XL Свитшоты и худи «МосСад» Размеры: S-XXL Заказать — у меня в личке: @allhailstormyweather
custom 5427293577724048961205😁87❤25🤣13
когда кого-то на западе обвиняют в домогательствах или неполиткорректности лучшая тактика - не комментировать. в россии лучшая тактика не комментировать обвинения в том что твой маскот похож на бафомета
😁423custom 542729357772404896194🤓29😈22
пиздец террористическую сперму всё-таки изъяли
😭621custom 5427293577724048961106😁59🫡10
>пока имагинировали как собр вламывается в эту клинику кладет всех лицом в пол и изымает сперму дурова? https://t.me/bbbreaking/234651
😁446🤣270😭42custom 542729357772404896140
сука клиника где можно взять сперму дурова уже добавила сноску что он террорист
😁957🤣528custom 5427293577724048961106❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @vasiileevaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 25,115 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“мелана:) неизданное” (@vasiileevaa), 20,228 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vasiileevaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.