Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Русский research

@trueresearch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,530subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372058170
TypeChannel
Username@trueresearch
Created11 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/trueresearch

Growth

26,53026,54926,539.56 August 2026 — 26,544 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,544 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,546 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,549 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,547 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,543 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,535 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,530 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,527–26,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:3526,530-5
11 Aug 2026, 20:1326,535-8
10 Aug 2026, 20:3826,543-4
9 Aug 2026, 23:3726,547-2
9 Aug 2026, 01:2126,549+3
8 Aug 2026, 01:1326,546+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:0226,544no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:1926,544first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.7%
avg views ÷ 26,530 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,940
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (29 April 202630 July 2026)
Views total17,870
Reactions total1,134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13,655 reactions across 20 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯3,17623.3%
🤣2,19316.1%
2,02114.8%
😁1,0968.03%
👍1,0887.97%
😱6564.80%
👏5704.17%
🤬5644.13%
🔥4963.63%
😢4393.21%
😭2732.00%
🙈2151.57%
🥰1881.38%
😨1611.18%
💊760.557%
💔740.542%
🤯660.483%
🤔390.286%
🤡370.271%
🌚240.176%
24 further kinds2031.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,655reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trueresearch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC≈9,890 views433 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

чувствую здесь какую-то метафору взаимоотношений чиновников с телеграмом источник

😁180👍152🔥53🌚17🤯15🤣7🙏32

28 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC≈7,980 views701 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ivoryzoo

#обозревая_происходящее Екатеринбург. Детишки катаются на квадроциклах по опытному полю Уральского федерального аграрного научно-исследовательского центра УрО РАН, давя посевы. Это обнаруживает директор института Никита Зезин, который детей задерживает, звонит родителям и везет в город. В тот же вечер к институту подъезжают 4 джипа, и директора избивают. Через 2 недели 67-летний директор, членкор РАН умирает от инф

🤬456😱144😢55💔19😨138🤯5👎1

28 Jun 2026, 15:52 UTC≈36,500 views443 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

38 миллионов за статью Вышел отчёт Счётной палаты о проверке НИЦ Курчатовский институт. Поэтому минутка статистики (данные по публикациям взяты с colab.ws). Бюджет Курчатника на выполнение госзадания в 2025 году составил 42,6 миллиарда рублей, из них 21 миллиард рублей потрачен на фундаментальную науку. За 2025 год сотрудниками НИЦ опубликованы 554 статьи в журналах 1-2 квартиля WoS (за 2024 год — примерно столько

168🤣121🔥44👍25😱24🤔20🙉15😁11

24 Jun 2026, 06:59 UTC≈27,000 views440 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

типичный ректор, который эффективно выстраивал системные связи через ведущих экспертов и консультантов в сфере высшего образования be like источник

😁36523💅20🔥11💯8🤔6💩2🥰2

21 Jun 2026, 16:51 UTC≈27,700 views297 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Критикуем и делаем. Не делаем и поддакиваем Я давно хотел развернуть мысль ВЛП о том, что у симуляционных практик в нашей сфере есть свои маркеры, причём весьма точные. Один-два признака могут совпасть случайно, но общий вектор гламура и потёмкинских деревень, как правило, определяется безошибочно. В известной степени это отражает структуру двухконтурного университета и двух миров науки, о которых мы с коллегами ре

🔥14666👍48🤣11💯9🤔6❤‍🔥5😭3

15 Jun 2026, 05:56 UTC≈20,500 views456 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

— Я сочетаю в себе черты гуманитария и технаря — Всё умеете и понимаете? — Нет. В вечном споре физиков и лириков досрочную победу одерживает Аналитический центр ВЦИОМ.

🤣345🔥5920🏆7🤗6👎4🤡4🥱4

14 Jun 2026, 07:45 UTC≈22,000 views854 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Гуманитарии strike back again В предыдущем посте я прокомментировал странную заметку в "Ведомостях" о трудоустройстве гуманитариев. Теперь я прочитал и сам доклад АЦ ВЦИОМ (скачивайте пока не удалили) и очень впечатлился. Авторы провалили демонстрацию "суперсил гуманитария", которые сами называют в тексте: владение языком, внимание к контексту и умение мыслить за рамками. Доклад основан на 30 интервью с экспертами.

🤣550🙈124👍6254💊23🔥15😁14👏5

12 Jun 2026, 14:29 UTC≈28,200 views587 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Гуманитарии strike back Академик Хохлов нашёл в "Ведомостях" удивительную заметку с пересказом исследования Аналитического центра ВЦИОМ. Речь о том, что в ближайшие 5 лет гуманитарии должны стать организаторами технарей. Само собой, потому что первые лучше ориентируются в социуме и чувствуют тонкие вибрации смыслов, а вторые — бесчувственные аутисты недостаточно учитывают человеческую природу и социокультурные аспе

309👍146💯76🤣21🙈9🔥7😢6🖕5

8 Jun 2026, 06:02 UTC≈22,900 views833 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги приводят слова ректора МФТИ Ливанова с полей ПМЭФ: "Если у университета сейчас объём исследования и разработок в пределах миллиарда рублей, то это уже по сути колледж. Университеты до трёх миллиардов рублей [в R&D] стремительно движутся в сторону колледжей". Не первый случай снобизма в исполнении Ливанова. Ранее он говорил, что в стране нет науки нигде, кроме нескольких университетов. И ведь если отбросить

💯598127🔥41😢27👍23😁8🤡4❤‍🔥2

2 Jun 2026, 05:34 UTC≈26,700 views733 reactions8 Starsread 12 August 2026

Передовик-2030 Из задней двери чёрного автомобиля с мигалкой вышел молодой человек в стильном костюме и дорогих часах: — Ну что, Андрей Анатольич, показывайте владения! У вас ведь первый научный институт полного экономического цикла! — Очень ждали, Арсений Игоревич, а вы всё в делах! — от группы встречающих отделился приземистый мужчина. — Проходите, всё посмотрим. Собеседники миновали засиженный голубями бюст,

👏278😨134😁95😢72🤣4139💯30👍15

1 Jun 2026, 10:11 UTC≈16,100 views691 reactionsread 12 August 2026

— если бы инструкция к сборке шкафа из ИКЕА была написана как научная статья — "К вопросу об особенностях соединения (скрепления) и установки промышленных серийных изделий общехозяйственного назначения" А.Г. Свампмал, П.Н. Якобслилья, К.К. Коппарранка Проблема соединения деталей является актуальной и ранее рассматривалась в работах [1-35]. Несмотря на растущий интерес к теме [36-43], многие операции соединения ост

🤣479😁7950🔥34👏21👍16🙈7🤔2

1 Jun 2026, 10:11 UTC≈11,900 views604 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Разберёмся по статьям? Непонимание того, зачем же мы тратим деньги на фундаментальную науку, порой настолько глубоко, что некоторые прописные истины хочется произносить снова и снова. Здесь я заранее извинюсь перед теми читателями, которым этого объяснять не нужно. Сегодня узкая нацеленность на коммерциализацию и экономический эффект создаёт впечатление, что без удовлетворения любопытства учёных за государственный

295💯211👍64🔥23👏7😢2🤝1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trueresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 53,088 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русский research” (@trueresearch), 26,530 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trueresearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.