РКН: bit.ly/3BMzsOR
Канал не представляет официальную позицию администрации НИЯУ МИФИ.
Хотите нас поддержать? Пожертвуйте любую сумму в Фонд целевого капитала НИЯУ МИФИ: https://endowment.mephi.ru
Вопросы и сотрудничество - в директ
Created
24 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 198 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net +715. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,772–29,804 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 08:09
29,611
-1
10 Nov 2026, 06:09
29,612
+1
8 Nov 2026, 15:51
29,611
-4
7 Nov 2026, 08:19
29,615
-2
6 Nov 2026, 05:50
29,617
-6
5 Nov 2026, 01:31
29,623
-6
3 Nov 2026, 22:47
29,629
-3
3 Nov 2026, 00:41
29,632
-8
2 Nov 2026, 03:16
29,640
-5
1 Nov 2026, 00:18
29,645
+1
30 Oct 2026, 22:49
29,644
-4
30 Oct 2026, 00:58
29,648
+1
29 Oct 2026, 04:19
29,647
-1
28 Oct 2026, 00:16
29,648
+5
26 Oct 2026, 20:45
29,643
-13
25 Oct 2026, 19:18
29,656
-1
24 Oct 2026, 20:27
29,657
-1
23 Oct 2026, 20:09
29,658
-14
22 Oct 2026, 20:19
29,672
-3
21 Oct 2026, 13:31
29,675
first reading
Engagement
230 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.8%
avg views ÷ 29,611 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,700
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 230 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
230 (1 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
659,530
Reactions total
6,896
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,500
Videos
≈153
Links
≈4,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 51s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28,228 reactions across 223 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,166
32.5%
🔥
4,523
16.0%
😁
3,804
13.5%
😢
2,300
8.15%
👍
2,020
7.16%
🕊
1,502
5.32%
🤯
1,201
4.25%
😱
1,067
3.78%
🎉
909
3.22%
👏
589
2.09%
🤔
354
1.25%
🏆
309
1.09%
⚡
266
0.942%
🥰
144
0.51%
😍
74
0.262%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 230 of the 230 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 34 of 68 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Есть идея? Проверь, сможет ли она стать стартапом
13 ноября в МИФИ можно будет за один день пройти первые этапы пути технологического предпринимателя — от поиска идеи до презентации собственного стартапа.
Это не семичасовая лекция. Участников ждёт бизнес-игра, в которой нужно будет:
— найти проблему и сформулировать идею решения;
— собрать проект и продумать, для кого он нужен;
— распределить роли в команде;
— подг…
Университет ИТМО переходит на корпоративную модель управления
Главное нововведение — впервые российским вузом будет управлять совет директоров, состоящий из лидеров ключевых направлений. Новую модель управления на заседании ученого совета ИТМО представили министру науки и высшего образования РФ Валерию Фалькову.
Владимир Васильев займет пост научного руководителя и генерального конструктора. В его контуре — техноло…
Куда обращаться по учебным вопросам?
В профильный сервис на home.mephi.ru.
Уже два года мы обрабатываем вопросы, обращения и жалобы.
Недавний пример:
Староста поток написал обращение с просьбой обеспечить дополнительную возможность сдачи лабораторных работ по физике, т.к. преподаватель просто не успевал принимать работы.
Принятое решение:
Перераспределить студентов между преподавателями, чтобы выровнять нагрузку …
Сегодня в МИФИ Наталья Касперская, президент ГК InfoWatch @natalya_kasperskaya_channel
Традиционно МИФИ принимает заседание РАН по комплексной проблеме «Информационная безопасность».
На сегодняшнем заседании обсуждалось изменение походов к информационной безопасности в эпоху массового применения ИИ.
Генеративный ИИ - возможно самая опасная технология со времён появления атомной бомбы. ИИ несёт, как существенные вы…
Сегодня главная страница Гарварда* радует нас рассказом о связи ведущего университета США и вооружённых сил США.
Не будем вдаваться во внутреннюю политику США, но что бы было в СМИ, если бы главная страница сайта условного МГУ была посвящена текущей работе этого ведущего отечественного университета над развитием вооружённых сил Российской Федерации?
*деятельность некоторых структур Гарвардского университета признан…
5 научно-практическая сессия «Росатом» – на пути к технологическому суверенитету
12 ноября 2026 г. в НИЯУ МИФИ состоится Пятая научно-практическая сессия «Госкорпорация «Росатом» – на пути к технологическому суверенитету: Прикладная робототехника в атомной отрасли».
Целью данной сессии является знакомство и обсуждение университетов, партнеров и Госкорпорации Росатом практических кейсов применения робототехники и оп…
Как вы знаете, у нас идёт активная дискуссия в университете об упрощённом экзамене по математике, который Кафедра "Высшая математика" ввела у себя на некоторых курсах.
Приведём статистику ответов на один из вопросов в опросе студентов от нашего Старостата.
Мы исходя из этих ответов видим интересную картинку, в которой, по сути, в глазах студентов за курсы высшей математики (с упрощённым экзаменом) можно получить 5 …
В МИФИ проходит очередной хакатон на 700 студентов-участников
За прошедшие семь лет хакатоны стали неотъемлемой частью университетской научной политики, закономерно развившись из молодёжной инициативы в часть жизни университета.
В большом весеннем хакатоне приняло участие 850 человек, на этот зарегистрировано 730 участников-студентов, 260 из которых решают одну из задач очно на базе студенческого офиса и других пом…
Выиграй первый грант вместе с акселератором технологических проектов НИЯУ МИФИ
До 1 декабря, 10:00 мск открыт приём заявок на 8-ю волну конкурса «Студенческий стартап».
Победители получают 1 млн рублей от Фонда содействия инновациям на развитие своего технологического проекта.
Но сильная идея — это ещё не сильная заявка.
Поэтому Акселератор технологических проектов НИЯУ МИФИ запускает бесплатный интенсив для студе…
Реплика директора НИ (филиала) КФУ Андрея Келлера про новую модель образования для нас ощущается, как предложение передать лидерство в новой модели образования средничкам.
Им даже предложено лекало, которое выглядит как "лучший вариант университета - это колледж для троечников, из которого через два года выйдут рабочие на завод".
Мы тут склонны ответить очень просто - надо чётко разобраться, что такое Университет.
…
Внутри МРТ: инженерия самого сложного медицинского прибора @podcast_mephi
За подробными снимками человеческого организма стоят сильные магнитные поля, радиочастотные сигналы и сложные инженерные решения. Как МРТ позволяет заглянуть внутрь человека? Почему привычному томографу нужно отдельное помещение, а портативный аппарат может работать от обычной розетки? И чем приходится жертвовать, чтобы сделать диагностику ком…
❤15🔥9👍4😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 230 posts we hold for @boilingmephi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@boilingmephi edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Давайте перейдём к насущному вопросу, который, уверены, волнует всех обывателей.
Как дела с топливом конкретно в вашем окружении?
Я автомобилист, всё скорее хорошо10%
У меня нет автомобиля, всё скорее хорошо14%
Я автомобилист, всё скорее плохо25%
У меня нет автомобиля, всё скорее плохо30%
У меня нет автомобиля, затрудняюсь ответить21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@boilingmephi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@survivingonlaplas named in 5 posts, 12 August 2026 – 19 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
мариша @verp_est · 225 (as read 8 September 2026)#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Grand Exam - Арсений Филин @grandexam_ege · 47,506 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Наука и университеты @naukauniver · 43,179 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Зоопарк из слоновой кости @ivoryzoo · 32,048 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
Первый университетский @msuthefirst · 29,584 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Русский research @trueresearch · 26,506 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
НОП.РФ @scienpolicy · 38,048 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
МФТИ — Физтех @miptru · 21,510 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
Поступашки - Олимпиады, ЕГЭ, ДВИ @postupashki · 31,941 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
Минобрнауки России @minobrnaukiofficial · 59,268 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере образования и науки (Рособрнадзор) @rosobrnadzor_official · 23,809 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
ШАГ | поступление в Университет @stepbyshag · 68,353 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Приёмная комиссия МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана @pk_bmstu · 23,284 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Алексей Савватеев и Родная Школа @alexei_savvateev · 35,626 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
ОбОбраз @ob_obraz · 30,229 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана @bmstu1830 · 29,414 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
Бураков про поступление @provuz · 28,662 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Диссертация | Наталья Киреева | О научных статьях и диссертациях @kireeva_science · 21,239 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 September 2026
МАИ @MAIuniversity · 24,642 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Максим Коваль. ЕГЭ по математике @MO_EGE · 81,482 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
БогданоV. О школе и не только @aboutschools · 25,722 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
Актион Образование @action_obrazovanie · 36,557 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Профиматика | ЕГЭ по Математике | Игорь Уколов и Влад Вуль @profimatika · 47,712 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кипящий МИФИ” (@boilingmephi), 29,611 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boilingmephi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.