Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Икона Фармы

@pharm_icon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,435subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001295831756
TypeChannel
Username@pharm_icon
Created14 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pharm_icon

Growth

9,4289,4379,432.56 August 2026 — 9,428 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,428 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,430 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,437 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,435 subscribers9,4356 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,427–9,438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:549,435-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:419,437+7
6 Aug 2026, 23:039,430+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:509,428no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:489,428first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.5%
avg views ÷ 9,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,860
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (1 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total97,207
Reactions total512
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

617 reactions across 22 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16025.9%
11318.3%
😐6610.7%
👍589.40%
🤯579.24%
💯436.97%
335.35%
🗿335.35%
🕊243.89%
😁162.59%
🍌71.13%
🌭50.81%
💅20.324%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC354 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В такой подборке вы меня ещё не видели🙆 https://t.me/Russica2/22185

😁8🔥2🗿2💯1

11 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC793 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Яблочный не спас, но никто и не рассчитывал всерьез🤦‍♀

🕊18💯92🍌2🔥1🗿1

11 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC821 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IChealthnetPhoto

🚨🚨🚨 Друзья, нужна ваша помощь! Мы готовим отраслевой круглый стол по ИИ и данным в медицине, который пройдет в рамках биомедтех-форума OpenBio в сентябре. Принципиально не хотим делать очередной дежурный хурал ради галочки, чтобы обсудить замыленные темы в духе «данные – новая нефть» или «почему врачи не доверяют ИИ». Хочется собрать реально рабочую, «злую» повестку и поднять темы, которые действительно триггерят со

7🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈5,770 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вакцины COVID-19 и Дания — компенсации детям за побочные эффекты Всего от детей и подростков подано 78 заявлений на компенсацию за побочные эффекты COVID-вакцины: 66 от детей 12–17 лет и 12 от детей 5–11 лет. По официальной таблице на сайте Patienterstatningen одобрено 10 заявлений (7 в возрасте 12–17 лет + 3 в возрасте 5–11), отклонено 66, ещё 2 на рассмотрении — цифры сходятся математически (78 = 10 + 66 + 2). О

🔥7

10 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,120 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💊Статины: найден механизм, по которому статины повреждают мышцы — и он не связан со снижением холестерина Мышечная боль и слабость — самая частая причина, по которой пациенты снижают дозу статинов или вовсе бросают терапию: с этим сталкиваются, по разным оценкам, 7–29% принимающих препарат. До сих пор механизм оставался во многом непонятным. Команда McMaster University (руководитель — профессор биохимии Джонатан Ш

🔥43🗿10😐105👍3

10 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC999 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

MHRA: 150 000 жалоб и 100+ смертей, связанных с препаратами для похудения Британский регулятор лекарственных средств (MHRA) опубликовал свежую статистику по нежелательным реакциям на препараты для снижения веса — и цифры внушительные. С момента появления агонистов GLP-1/GIP на рынке пациенты в Великобритании подали около 150 тысяч жалоб на побочные эффекты. Более 200 смертей потенциально связаны с этими препаратами

😐8🤯5

3 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,520 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Cochrane 2026: альбумин для людей с циррозом печени и бактериальными инфекциями У Кокрейн вышел новый систематический обзор о применении альбумина, который традиционно что-то чуть-чуть переворачивает с ног на голову. Спонтанный бактериальный перитонит Положение действующих документов: Альбумин снижает смертность (AASLD 2021, EASL 2018, КР РФ 2025, КП РК 2020; исходно Sort 1999) Cochrane 2026 Смертность от всех пр

8👍5🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈5,060 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Крепостной доктор Доктора, расскажите, как крепостных докторов к вам распределяют - сколько уже, сколько ожидаете. Крепостные доктора, расскажите, как там обстановка. Жутко интересно.

💯14😐6🗿43

30 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,960 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇺🇿Узбекистан стимулирует к развитию свой рынок БАДов Ценовая реформа — центральная тема фармповестки в Узбекистане. С 28 марта действует система референтных цен на рецептурные препараты — предельная стоимость на основе сравнения с референтными странами. Исходный перечень (введён в 2020-м, когда систему запускали): Россия, Украина, Польша, Венгрия, Таджикистан, Казахстан, Словения, Болгария, Кыргызстан и Беларусь. Т

4

30 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,520 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💊 Почему российская фарма сегодня растет быстрее, чем многие ожидают? Все обсуждают лекарства. Ребята из «Цифра брокер» решили поговорить с теми, кто их производит. В новом видеоподкасте «Биржевой диалог» представитель «Озон Фармацевтики» рассказала, как меняется отрасль, какие препараты добавляются в портфель, что происходит внутри компании и какие направления станут драйверами развития в ближайшие годы. Живой ра

🔥117👍32🗿1

29 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Читаете научные журналы на русском?

  1. Да, много11%
  2. Да, мало41%
  3. Не читаю36%
  4. Что такое научные журналы?12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @pharm_icon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTCFinal Results132 voters

Читаете научные журналы на русском?

  1. Да, много11%
  2. Да, мало41%
  3. Не читаю36%
  4. Что такое научные журналы?12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTCFinal Results126 voters

Вопрос из реального мира — смотрели Одиссею Нолана?

  1. Да и мне понравилось5%
  2. Да, и мне не понравилось2%
  3. Нет, но планирую52%
  4. Нет и не планирую41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 48,778 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Медицинская Россия
@mediamedics · 143,097
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Икона Фармы” (@pharm_icon), 9,435 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pharm_icon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.