Channel
@cme_channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,564subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001079749929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cme_channel |
| Description | Немного математики каждый день // для обратной связи: [email protected] (интересным вещам по теме канала всегда рады; за деньги или за «обмен ссылками» ничего не публикуем) |
| Created | 7 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cme_channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 12,564 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 12,572 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 12,573 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 12,564 | +10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 12,554 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 12,549 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 12,547 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 12,538 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 12,542 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 12,542 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (22 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 120,440 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
mathnet.ru/conf2717 24-28 августа в МИАН проходит конференция, посвящённая 125-летию со дня рождения Петра Сергеевича Новикова (15(28).08.1901–09.01.1975) в т.ч. планируются доклады, посвященные вкладу П.С. в — комбинаторную и алгоритмическую теорию групп (И.Г.Лысёнок) — дескриптивную теорию множеств (В.Г.Кановей); — теорию доказательств (Л.Д.Беклемишев) *** mathnet.ru/conf2744 тж обратим внимание на проходящий …
Пусть X — n-мерное центрально-симметричное выпуклое тело. Для некоторого 1<k<n известно, что любые два сечения тела k–мерными плоскостями, содержащими центр симметрии, линейно эквивалентны. Гипотеза Банаха (1932): X — эллипсоид. вот рассказ про это на ЛШСМ-2023: www.mathnet.ru/present39713 а вот, как утверждается, доказательство для всех нечетных k (для четных доказал Громов в 1967 году): arxiv.org/abs/2608.13536
сегодня юбилей у arXiv'а — 35 лет в arxiv.org/abs/1108.2700 можно прочитать некоторые подробности истории «As the various pre-existing networks melded into the Internet by the late 1980s, email connectivity had reached critical mass in my own research community of high energy physics. (…) The exchange of completed manuscripts to personal contacts directly by email became more widespread, and ultimately led to distr…
geometry.ru/ilya_4.html в пятницу 28 августа в МЦНМО будет IV семинар учителей математики памяти Ильи Сиротовского (09.05.1983–24.06.2023) 14:00 Д.Э.Шноль. Задачи на конструирование в арифметике и алгебре 15:15 Д.Г.Мухин. Теорема Безу от 8 до 11 класса 16:10 Ю.А.Блинков. Вписанные углы приглашаются все желающие, но просят зарегистрироваться (по ссылке)
x.com/__alpoge__/status/2087504785952182273 ( контекст: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadamard_matrix )
arxiv.org/abs/2608.08538 «Researchers studying the inverse Galois problem realized 25 of the 26 sporadic finite simple groups as Galois groups over ℚ during 1984--1989. We complete this program by proving that the last remaining sporadic group, the Mathieu group M23, occurs as a Galois group over ℚ. In fact, we produce an explicit degree 23 polynomial with rational coefficients whose splitting field has Galois group…
https://www.mathnet.ru/rus/present51086 появляются также видеозаписи рассказов Н.Калинина на ЛШСМ-2026
с большим удовольствием прочитал на дубнинской (в этом году царскосельской) школе Современная математика лекции о иррациональности дзеты от тройки, см. записки. По совету В. Зудилина переименовал творческое телескопирование в созидательное (а в переводе Конкретной математики оно было названо механическим!!)
https://www.math.toronto.edu/askold/2004-Appendix-Alekseev-teorema-Abel-russian.pdf А.Г.Хованский. Разрешимость уравнений в конечном виде (теория Лиувилля, дифференциальная теория, топологические препятствия) (упоминается, кстати, и Мордухай-Болтовской)
dabromat.ru/lektoriy «Дабромат» проводит серию открытых лекций (в основном вокруг кубических кривых) 10.08 Д.Бродский. Кубика произведений 12.08 Д.Дёмин. Эллиптические кривые в криптографии 13.08 М.Евдокимов. Необычные построения 18-19.08 П.Бибиков. Геометрия Лобачевского 2 ??.08 А.Калмынин. Точки на эллиптических кривых над конечным полем 21.08 М.Волчкевич. Неравенства в геометрии и задачи на максимум-минимум 23.0…
картинки по выходным — из проекта «Геометрия окружностей» (А.Кушнир, П.Ким, А.Суворов, А.Сайгак, Ф.Нилов) на ЛКТГ-2026
150 лет назад родился Дмитрий Дмитриевич Мордухай-Болтовской (1876–1952) окончил Петербургский университет; с конца 1890-х работал в основном в Варшаве (сначала — ассистентом при Г.Ф.Вороном); из его математических результатов сейчас время от времени вспоминают деятельность, связанную с интегрируемостью линейных дифф. уравнений, но он занимался еще разными вещами от геометрических построений (прежде всего в геометри…
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @cme_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@cme_channel edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 14,932 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Непрерывное математическое образование” (@cme_channel), 12,564 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cme_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.