Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АДовый рисёрч

Channel

АДовый рисёрч

@ad_research

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,266subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002148719074
TypeChannel
Username@ad_research
DescriptionПеревожу задания научника в понятные инструкции Навигация по каналу и условия рекламы: https://t.me/ad_research/604 Поддержать автора или получить доступ к закрытому чату и личным постам можно на Boosty: https://boosty.to/ad_research
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ad_research

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,18010,29210,2366 August 2026 — 10,229 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,229 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,230 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,225 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,220 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,217 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,216 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,212 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,210 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,207 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,212 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,208 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,206 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,202 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,199 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,201 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,198 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,196 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,195 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,194 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,188 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,189 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,188 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,189 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,180 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,202 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,209 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,217 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,218 subscribers1 October 2026 — 10,289 subscribers6 October 2026 — 10,292 subscribers10 October 2026 — 10,282 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,279 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,278 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,275 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,277 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,281 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,280 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,276 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,273 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,274 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,276 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,278 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,275 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,276 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,275 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,274 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,272 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,270 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,271 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,275 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,274 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,271 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,272 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,269 subscribers10 November 2026 — 10,266 subscribers10,2666 August 202610 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,163–10,309 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 06:3610,266-3
8 Nov 2026, 17:4910,269-3
7 Nov 2026, 11:4110,272+1
5 Nov 2026, 10:3610,271-3
4 Nov 2026, 12:4710,274-1
3 Nov 2026, 11:0610,275+4
2 Nov 2026, 12:4810,271+1
1 Nov 2026, 15:4510,270-2
31 Oct 2026, 18:4810,272-2
30 Oct 2026, 20:3510,274-1
29 Oct 2026, 22:4010,275-1
28 Oct 2026, 19:2110,276+1
26 Oct 2026, 17:0910,275-3
25 Oct 2026, 13:4010,278+2
24 Oct 2026, 14:2710,276+2
22 Oct 2026, 11:3010,274+1
21 Oct 2026, 03:1410,273-3
20 Oct 2026, 02:2710,276-4
18 Oct 2026, 22:5610,280-1
17 Oct 2026, 21:2810,281first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 10,266 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,120
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held78 (28 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total84,120
Reactions total2,646
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 10:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,080
Videos
≈115
Links
≈613

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,720 reactions across 77 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,98518.5%
😁1,48113.8%
custom 52354781220815605351,29512.1%
custom 52379111566302329629058.44%
custom 53304628055963264058848.25%
💯6846.38%
🔥6215.79%
🤣5825.43%
❤‍🔥3913.65%
😭3663.41%
😢2131.99%
💔1801.68%
👍1781.66%
🤡1321.23%
😱820.765%
🤪710.662%
🤔680.634%
🤩520.485%
🍾500.466%
👏400.373%
32 further kinds4604.29%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,986 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
101
across the posts below
Posts paid on
69
of 78 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ad_research. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.28%
1 of 78 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,680
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,550
over 77 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqubH3Lo126 August 202626 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (3.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC≈1,330 views53 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

#сдохни_или_умри Привет, коллеги! Представим ситуацию: руководитель настолько вам доверяет, что не перепроверяет ваши дизайны исследований и просто говорит разобраться самостоятельно. Вы делаете, приносите результат, а он говорит, что всё не так, всё неправильно и нужно переделать. Понятно, что нам приходится учиться на своих ошибках, но лично моё мнение, что пока у вас есть научный руководитель, он должен от части…

❤38👍6custom 52354781220815605356🔥2😁1

10 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,070 views107 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

#лаблыба

custom 523547812208156053568😭17😁10💯7❤4custom 53304628055963264051

10 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC≈2,160 views84 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Внимание, коллеги! Найден канал с мемами здорового интеллигентного человека. Мемы на любые темы: медицина, физика, биология, математика, литература, живопись, история и психология, обычно приурочены к какому-нибудь тематическому событию. Ко многим картинкам есть ещё и пояснение, так что деградировать, листая ленту, не получится 🥺. Кстати, сегодня на канале как раз тематические мемы ко Всемирному дню науки за мир и р…

custom 533046280559632640552🔥19😁7❤‍🔥3❤2custom 52354781220815605351

9 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,670 views127 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

#лаблыба

custom 533046280559632640577😁36🗿10💯4

9 Nov 2026, 05:55 UTC≈2,490 views155 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤86👍32❤‍🔥31🤔3💘1🔥1🤩1

8 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC≈2,490 views119 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

#воскресный_импорт

custom 533046280559632640579😭15custom 523547812208156053510💯9❤4😁2

7 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC≈3,040 views114 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

#лаблыба

🤣102💯9😁3

6 Nov 2026, 19:52 UTC≈3,140 views146 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

Все кринжуют с новости о коворкинге на ФББ, я тоже орнула. А сейчас увидела снова и подумала, что именно так иногда и ощущаются результаты работы в вузе. Ты хочешь что-то сделать удобное для студентов, видишь, что у них нет коворкинга/раздевалки/кулера с водой/etc. Идешь с этим к руководству, оно тебя посылает к финансам. Идёшь к финансам, они шлют тебя к юристам. Юристы шлют на три буквы... Ты возвращаешься к руков…

❤64🤣31💔22💯15custom 52354781220815605358👍3😁2🤡1

6 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈3,040 views148 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Всем хороших выходных, коллеги!

custom 523547812208156053595❤30custom 53304628055963264059😁6💯4😭4

6 Nov 2026, 05:43 UTC≈3,760 views119 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

#it_is_Friday_my_fellows Привет, коллеги! С вас последний сохранённый мем в комментарии. С меня лайк. 🤝

custom 533046280559632640581custom 523547812208156053518❤14🔥4❤‍🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,850 views31 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Грантовый конкурс на курс «ИИ в научной работе» Бластим и Electrobiopunk — научпоп-проект о современной биологии и биотехнологиях — ищут тех, кому ИИ уже нужен в работе или учёбе: для поиска литературы, анализа данных, автоматизации рутины, подготовки публикаций, создания ботов и агентов. 🏆 Гранты от Electrobiopunk: — 1 место — скидка 99% — еще 2 места — скидка 50% 🔥 Бластим дополнительно даст гранты самым сильным…

🔥14❤8custom 52379111566302329624custom 52354781220815605353👍1custom 53304628055963264051

5 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC≈3,670 views133 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026
Photo

#дед_инсайд Привет, коллеги! Допустим, у вас есть подруга, и у этой подруги есть муж. Он работает, приносит какие-то деньги в семью, дарит подарки на 8 Марта, день рождения и Новый год, раз в месяц сделает комплимент и сводит в ресторан. Но при этом тормозит её развитие, требуя повышенного внимания к своим мелким потребностям, игнорирует её просьбы, её состояние и в целом придерживается позиции «не нравится — уходи…

💔74❤24custom 523547812208156053518💯5🤯5😁3🤔2👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @ad_research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 05:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz677 voters

Чей пост?

  1. ChatGPT17%
  2. DeepSeek57%
  3. Claude12%
  4. АД14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Oct 2026, 05:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz626 voters

Чей пост?

  1. ChatGPT15%
  2. DeepSeek35%
  3. Claude34%
  4. АД17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Oct 2026, 05:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz650 voters

Чей пост?

  1. ChatGPT11%
  2. DeepSeek21%
  3. Claude19%
  4. АД49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Oct 2026, 05:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz666 voters

Чей пост?

  1. ChatGPT38%
  2. DeepSeek26%
  3. Claude23%
  4. АД12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTCAnonymous Poll1,970 voters approx.

Кстати, а как вы коротко называете научного руководителя

  1. Научник46%
  2. Научрук36%
  3. Науч7%
  4. Научный руководитель (не сокращаю)7%
  5. Другое (напишу в комментарии)4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Зоопарк из слоновой кости
@ivoryzoo · 32,030
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА ФРАНЦ про ХИМИЮ
@chemistry_frants · 45,006
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Наука и университеты
@naukauniver · 43,179
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Sci_Career
@sci_career · 30,649
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Русский research
@trueresearch · 26,506
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АДовый рисёрч” (@ad_research), 10,266 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ad_research.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.