This channel is your single destination for all #Crypto related stuff and analysis.
Disclaimer: Do trading and investment at your own risk and always do your own research. We are not responsible for any losses.
Created
29 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 93 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 30 of the 30 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 347 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 93 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @tirangaa_vip. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 93 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
42 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -25,194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 243,371–276,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 01:10
247,150
-263
8 Nov 2026, 18:50
247,413
-285
7 Nov 2026, 13:25
247,698
-221
6 Nov 2026, 09:56
247,919
-185
5 Nov 2026, 08:39
248,104
-211
4 Nov 2026, 08:09
248,315
-562
3 Nov 2026, 05:17
248,877
-598
2 Nov 2026, 07:26
249,475
-39
1 Nov 2026, 09:54
249,514
-81
31 Oct 2026, 12:17
249,595
-236
30 Oct 2026, 11:15
249,831
-1,296
29 Oct 2026, 07:55
251,127
+482
28 Oct 2026, 02:57
250,645
+5
27 Oct 2026, 05:00
250,640
+55
26 Oct 2026, 02:40
250,585
+445
24 Oct 2026, 23:15
250,140
-141
24 Oct 2026, 02:16
250,281
+158
23 Oct 2026, 05:07
250,123
+14
22 Oct 2026, 08:34
250,109
-54
20 Oct 2026, 23:34
250,163
first reading
Engagement
440 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 222 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 247,150 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,900
101 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
101
of 440 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
440 (30 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
2,717,300
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 16:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,000
Videos
≈188
Links
≈2,010
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 101 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#GRAM/USDT ANALYSIS
GRAM has broken out of the descending channel with significant volume, signaling strong bullish momentum.
The 50MA is currently acting as a key support level below the price action, reinforcing the bullish structure.
GRAM appears well-positioned for another upward rally, provided it continues to hold above the breakout level and the 50MA.
#BTC DOMINANCE ANALYSIS
BTC Dominance is trading inside the horizontal supply zone of the ascending triangle pattern and is currently moving within the Ichimoku cloud, indicating indecision in the market.
A rejection from the supply zone could trigger further downside in Bitcoin Dominance, potentially supporting a bullish move across altcoins.
On the other hand, a solid breakout above the supply zone could invalid…
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS
Bitcoin is currently holding above the support trendline of the descending broadening wedge pattern, keeping the potential for a recovery intact.
Meanwhile, the Ichimoku cloud is acting as a key resistance barrier below the wedge's resistance trendline.
If BTC continues to hold above the support trendline, we could see a potential upward rally.
On the other hand, a confirmed breakdown below thi…
#LINK/USDT ANALYSIS
LINK is consolidating within the descending channel, while the Ichimoku cloud is acting as a key resistance barrier above the current price action.
A solid breakout above the channel resistance could trigger an upward rally and strengthen bullish momentum.
On the other hand, a confirmed breakdown below the channel support could lead to further correction in LINK.
#S&P 500 ANALYSIS
The S&P 500 has broken down the rising wedge pattern with significant volume and is currently retesting the breakdown level.
Meanwhile, price action is moving within the Ichimoku cloud, indicating a potential period of indecision around this critical zone.
A successful retest and rejection from the breakdown level could confirm further downside momentum and trigger another leg of correction in th…
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS
Bitcoin is currently holding above the support trendline of the descending broadening wedge pattern, making this a crucial level to watch.
A strong rebound from this support could trigger a potential recovery in price action.
On the other hand, a confirmed breakdown below the wedge support trendline could lead to further correction in the market.
#OPEN/USDT ANALYSIS
OPEN is consolidating within the falling wedge pattern, indicating a potential breakout setup.
A solid breakout above the wedge resistance would provide strong bullish confirmation and could trigger a significant upward rally.
Keep a close eye on the breakout level for confirmation.
#USDT DOMINANCE ANALYSIS
USDT Dominance is trading below the horizontal supply zone of the ascending triangle pattern, while the Ichimoku cloud is acting as a key support zone.
A solid breakout above the triangle's supply zone could trigger further upside in USDT Dominance, potentially putting additional pressure on the crypto market.
On the other hand, a rejection from the current resistance zone or a breakdown b…
#DASH/USDT ANALYSIS
DASH is rebounding from the support trendline of the falling wedge pattern, indicating a potential recovery in price action.
However, the 50MA is currently acting as a key resistance barrier.
A solid breakout above both the 50MA and the wedge resistance trendline would provide strong bullish confirmation and could trigger another significant upward rally.
#CYBER/USDT ANALYSIS
CYBER is facing strong rejection from the horizontal supply zone but is still holding above the support trendline, keeping the current structure intact.
Meanwhile, the Ichimoku cloud is acting as a key resistance barrier above the price action.
A solid breakout above both the Ichimoku cloud and the horizontal supply zone would provide strong bullish confirmation and could trigger a significant…
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS
Bitcoin has broken down the descending triangle pattern with significant volume, signaling strong bearish momentum.
The Ichimoku cloud is currently acting as a key resistance barrier above the price action, reinforcing the bearish structure.
BTC appears vulnerable to further downside, provided it continues to trade below the broken patter support and the Ichimoku cloud. Keep a close eye on upcom…
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS
Bitcoin is still holding above the support trendline of the broadening wedge pattern, keeping the current market structure intact.
Meanwhile, the 100MA is acting as a key resistance barrier above the current price action.
A solid breakout above the 100MA could strengthen bullish momentum and trigger another upward rally in the market.
Showing the 12 most recent of 440 posts we hold for @thecryptoexpress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 39 posts on @thecryptoexpress as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
37 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto VIP Signal @CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,043 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Technical CRYPTO Analyst @TechCryptoAnalyst · 308,245 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Empire Signal™ @CryptoEmpire_Signal · 26,775 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Crypto Trade Master @cryptotrademaster · 35,107 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
The Analyst CRYPTO @TheAnalystCrypto · 65,228 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️ @CryptoKlondike · 56,825 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Trading Coach @tradingcoach · 68,878 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Trading Crypto Guide ™ @TCGFORYOU · 74,322 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Whales Crypto Guide @Whalesguide · 182,610 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Side Eye News @kolesignal · 19,260 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 September 2026
Dr. Crypto | Free Signals 👨🏻⚕️ @drcrypto_trading · 28,327 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Crypto @signal_bitcoins · 52,277 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
Binance Signals TURKEY🎖🚀 @binancesignalsturkeyyyy · 20,120 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
100eyes Crypto Scanner (PREVIEW) @CryptoScanner100eyes · 30,770 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
King of Futures @crypto_futures_king · 36,961 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Crypto Capital | Community @cryptocapitalgl · 46,320 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
We take off (crypto trading) @vip_signal · 181,006 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Analytics Insight @analyticsinsightmag · 33,556 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Altcoin & Bitcoin Trading @altcoinsignals · 51,546 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
The Bull @thebull_crypto · 170,635 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official® @wallstreetqueenofficial · 147,837 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Binance Killers® @binancekillers · 233,171 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
SquawkSwap Official 🦜 @squawkswapofficial · 20,393 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 247 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Crypto Express” (@thecryptoexpress), 247,150 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecryptoexpress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.