MICROSOFT & US AVIATION CRASHED BEFORE 17th NOV EMERGENCY TEST. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfuBzStph3T/?vrfl=YThodTR5cWEwMTY0

Channel
Crypto India Haveli
@OfficiaLCryptoindia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
56,863subscribers
-2,714 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001390964323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OfficiaLCryptoindia |
| Description | Hi Welcome to Alishan Haveli for Dheet Hodlrs. In this Haveli - We share free education based on our own views which can be right or wrong (Mostly Wrong). Whatever you read here look at it for reference - don't rely 100% on it because it's your portfolio |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OfficiaLCryptoindia |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 17:47 | 56,863 | -43 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 11:50 | 56,906 | -22 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:21 | 56,928 | -28 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 16:49 | 56,956 | -38 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:46 | 56,994 | -26 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:30 | 57,020 | -28 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 57,048 | -33 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:07 | 57,081 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:08 | 57,093 | -37 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:26 | 57,130 | -15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 57,145 | -38 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 57,183 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:20 | 57,195 | -47 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:58 | 57,242 | -27 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 57,269 | -20 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 57,289 | -40 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 57,329 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:26 | 57,326 | -25 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 57,351 | -30 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 57,381 | first reading |
Engagement
1,976 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.90%
- avg views ÷ 56,863 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,210
- 704 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 704
- of 1,976 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,976 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,559,307 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,880
- Videos
- ≈124
- Links
- ≈17,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 704 posts held from the last 30 days (0.568%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US House Oversight Chair calls for ban on government officials betting on prediction markets. https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121541036652872042
Elon Musk publicly criticizes Nvidia's board of directors amid the controversy surrounding Jensen Huang's resignation. "This is the board making decisions about what used to be the most valuable company on Earth!?" A petition urging Nvidia to reinstate Jensen Huang as CEO is currently underway, with over 50,000 signatures, including Elon Musk's. https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121510682520907820
JUST IN: Crypto market lost $230 billion in market value this week. https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121504046016278710
JUST IN: 🇮🇳 Indian stock market added ₹4.11 trillion in market value this week. https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121501478515003406
JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 Elon Musk to join Trump on China trip next week amid Nvidia espionage scandal. https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121489631715954702
UPDATE: 🇺🇸 US spot crypto ETF flows (November 13) 📉Bitcoin: -$185M 📈Ethereum: +$2.3M 📉Solana: -$3M 📉XRP: -$1M https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121486519995355216
https://x.com/cryptoady/status/2121485250811531319?a=lfbhfwffMB71sEuo59U&s=46
BREAKING: 🇺🇸US faced a nationwide flight suspension after a telecommunications failure disrupted air traffic control operations across all 22 regional control centres. https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121476766984266111
UPDATE: 🇮🇳 Coinbase temporarily suspends INR withdrawals in India due to a banking partner outage. https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121456917470232676?a=ZHn5JeJzmK67YERqfnI&s=20
🚨 Bitcoin falls under $67,000 https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121453890407399877?a=UhN4lsjL3LQu4ebx3as&s=20
NEW: 🇺🇸 White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett is expected to leave his post. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is being considered as his replacement. https://x.com/CryptooIndia/status/2121322769820627430
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,976 posts we hold for @OfficiaLCryptoindia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Making Trading group ?
- Yes92%
- No8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 2 October 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bitcoinexpertindia · 37,593#1
@cryptojargon69 · 35,708#2
@CryptoPointHi · 28,835#3
@cryptoamanclub · 100,332#4
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 49,241#5
@CryptowithVishal_Official · 14,862#6
@CryptoTalksBudhil · 84,462#7
@itsyourCryptoGuy · 11,561#8
@wazirx · 96,209#9
@cryptocultclub · 10,281#10
@gameofbitcoins_channel · 9,826#11
@CryptoHindiO · 23,653#12
@CryptoNotesbaba · 13,042#13
@startfromzerofamily · 42,698#14
@cryptonianhimanshuofficial · 8,154#15
@Bitcoinduniyaitsfuture · 14,046#16
@bitinning · 4,982#17
@SmartViewAI · 44,495#18
@ImSamjhaDoBhaiya · 13,349#19
@Crypto200Earning · 12,484#20
@globalrashidfamily · 15,096#21
@cryptogg · 101,420#22
@CryptosignalUS · 9,088#23
@CryptoverseSignal · 3,108#24
@cryptoksaofficial · 14,731#25
@cryptoverseann · 3,155#26
@cryptoguy_yt · 14,564#27
@CryptoMoneyMantra · 2,869#28
@optinx · 7,268#29
@EliteCryptoTool · 4,258#30
@VivanLiveCrypto · 1,576#31
@Todaycryptosignal · 16,219#32
@BitImmortal · 1,594#33
@SDBtrader · 2,419#34
@technocrazy21 · 8,830#35
@alokhotdeals · 6,175#36
@learnwithronykapoor · 31,574#37
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,024#38
@wiseadvicebysumit · 162,498#39
@open4profit · 76,689#40
@EarnWithSapna · 47,422#41
@next10xgem1 · 320,427#42
@scalpsnipers · 5,029#43
@blumcrypto · 12,712,250#44
@everythingajay · 42,933#45
@hamster_kombat · 19,514,356#46
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 313,105#47
@notcoin · 7,763,105#48
@thecryptoexpress · 246,899#49
@binance_announcements · 3,198,525#50
@Cats_housewtf · 6,984,959#51
@WatcherGuru · 632,776#52
@mastercryptohq · 256,203#53
@forextalksbudhil · 7,738#54
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 88,122#55
@TCGFORYOU · 74,221#56
@CoinDCX_Announcements · 175,440#57
@GaCryptOfficial · 36,096#58
@ytcryptovel · 9,225#59
@CryptoKingKeyur · 593,570#60
@catizenann · 3,294,946#61
@BCUSAReal · 144,892#62
@EliteCryptoGroupOfficial · 9,416#63
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 307,417#64
@VikingsAnalyst · 36,682#65
@SmartViewAirdrop · 4,457#66
@freetonairdropfee · 9,623#67
@Whalesguide · 178,233#68
@hotonnear · 4,278,207#69
@freevipsignal · 3,492#70
@thebull_crypto · 170,350#71
@freemejankari · 46,491#72
@GACapital · 5,739#73
@catapult_extreme · 7,534,950#74
@techranjanofficial · 45,703#75
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,515,601#76
@sageairdrops · 42,370#77
@pushpacommunity · 1,286#78
@cointelegraph · 325,355#79
@cryptoquant_alert · 69,802#80
@KingChart · 5,226#81
@gemfinderz · 2,699#82
@feature_earning · 57,775#83
@whale_alert_io · 296,074#84
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 131,327#85
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 101,068#86
@moneygurudigi · 72,729#87
@EarnWithRk · 3,998#88
@dogs · 6,398,597#89
@tomarket_ai · 5,841,109#90
@realgoats_channel · 4,163,341#91
@Jargonpremiumresults · 2,285#92
@beimoneycare · 2,027#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptoPointHi · 28,835
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
@wazirx · 96,209
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@cryptojargon69 · 35,708
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
@bitcoinexpertindia · 37,593
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@SmartViewAI · 44,495
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@Lakshyaglobaltrades · 43,897
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 49,241
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@cryptoamanclub · 100,332
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@deltaexchangeyoutube · 22,497
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
@intelligenttrader123 · 27,220
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
@bhawanisinghgs · 23,017
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 September 2026
@CoinDCX_Announcements · 175,440
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
@umeshsharmachartanalysis · 38,074
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
@PushkarRajThakurOfficial · 209,287
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoHindiO · 23,653
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
@Sujaljethwani · 19,429
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 September 2026
@DhawanSir · 136,581
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
@English_Connection · 51,515
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 24 August 2026
@CryptoTalksBudhil · 84,462
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@ttrcryptogroup · 153,410
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@thetraderoomss · 359,453
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@AceinkOfficial · 141,546
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@p4provider · 26,100
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
@MP_GK_Quiz · 20,947
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 132 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto India Haveli” (@OfficiaLCryptoindia), 56,863 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OfficiaLCryptoindia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.