Trade on BingX for a profit 🔀 👉 https://bingx.com/partner/IF52BS/

Channel
Crypto Master | Futures Signals
@binancemaster_trader
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,078subscribers
-258 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001542812857 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @binancemaster_trader |
| Description | ✅ Daily 4-8 signals ✅ Technical analysis ✅ Trading strategies ✅ Instructions for beginners ✅ Average monthly profit up to 700% Join to VIP 👉 @SamCrypto_Mastervip |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/binancemaster_trader |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 31,078 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 31,098 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 31,112 | -25 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 31,137 | -31 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 31,168 | -34 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 31,202 | -18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 31,220 | -24 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 31,244 | -16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 31,260 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 31,267 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 31,272 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 31,298 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 31,317 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 31,336 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:29 | 31,336 | first reading |
Engagement
234 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.635%
- avg views ÷ 31,078 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 197
- 231 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 234
- of 234 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 234 (6 August 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45,618 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈37,000
- Videos
- ≈386
- Links
- ≈1,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 30s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#BTC WEEKLY TF UPDATE: #BTC had a very strong move up and a very bullish candle straight to the resistance around $78,150. If today's candle closes this strongly, expect a shallow retracement followed by another leg up. Therefore, the week might include a retracement phase.
Print money. Again and again and again. Not a day goes by without us making a profit in our VIP CLUB. Our strategy is exceptional and we continue to improve it every day. I feel like I'm spending my time convincing you to join us. While you hesitate, we take action. @SamCrypto_Mastervip
9️⃣ SPOTS LEFT 50% OFF - 💣 Weekends Promotion ☝️Futures signals (USDT) pairs ☝️ Daily 4-8 signals ☝️Technical analysis ☝️ Entry/ Take Profit/Stop Loss Zones ☝️Trading strategies ☝️Instructions for beginners ☝️Support 24/7 ☝️Average monthly profit up to 700% Feedbacks : @feedbacksmastervipclub Now Price for VIP membership: 💎 Futures VIP channel: 200$ - 99$ (1 month) 💎 Futures VIP channel: 400$ - 199$ (6 months) …
#TAC +373%
Photo, posted without a caption
#ACE/USDT Target №5 - ✅ Mark price - 0.24890 Profit - 150%+
#ACE/USDT Target №4 - ✅ Mark price - 0.24641 Profit - 125%+
#ACE/USDT Target №3 - ✅ Mark price - 0.24309 Profit - 87.5%+
#ACE/USDT Target №2 - ✅ Mark price - 0.24052 Profit - 62.5%+
#ACE/USDT Target №1 - ✅ Mark price - 0.23830 Profit - 37.5%+
This kind of result is within everyone's reach. Absolutely everyone. Even with a small budget, little by little it will grow and you will be able to do wonders. Take advantage of available discount spot to join us👇 https://t.me/binancemaster_trader/54481 📊 @SamCrypto_Mastervip
Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @binancemaster_trader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Waiting for a 50% discount?
- Yes96%
- No4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you want a 70% discount at VIP? 🔥
- Yes93%
- No7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤩SHOULD WE MAKE A WEEKEND SALE?
- ✅YEAH96%
- ❗️NO4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 78,735
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@AlexFriedmanCrypto · 74,593
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Master | Futures Signals” (@binancemaster_trader), 31,078 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binancemaster_trader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.