Squawk is checking for glitches again. Voss is just happy his eyes haven't turned into a spreadsheet yet. Itβs a very long Tuesday.

Channel
SquawkSwap Official π¦
@squawkswapofficial
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
22,321subscribers
-400 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002131232996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @squawkswapofficial |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/squawkswapofficial |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 22,321 | -42 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 22,363 | -40 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 22,403 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 22,420 | -22 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 22,442 | -31 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 22,473 | -33 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 22,506 | -36 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 22,542 | -25 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 22,567 | -20 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 22,587 | -28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 22,615 | -46 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 22,661 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 22,670 | -19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 22,689 | -32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 22,721 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 22,721 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 29.0%
- avg views Γ· 22,321 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,480
- 32 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.799%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 32
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (22 July 2026 β 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 207,305 |
| Reactions total | 1,445 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,932 reactions across 31 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.92% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 153 | 7.92% | |
| π | 139 | 7.19% | |
| β€ | 128 | 6.63% | |
| π | 127 | 6.57% | |
| π«‘ | 125 | 6.47% | |
| π€© | 119 | 6.16% | |
| π | 116 | 6.00% | |
| π€£ | 107 | 5.54% | |
| π₯° | 101 | 5.23% | |
| π | 100 | 5.18% | |
| π | 99 | 5.12% | |
| π | 97 | 5.02% | |
| π | 96 | 4.97% | |
| π | 91 | 4.71% | |
| π€ͺ | 81 | 4.19% | |
| π | 78 | 4.04% | |
| π€ | 64 | 3.31% | |
| π | 56 | 2.90% | |
| π | 55 | 2.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,932reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Watching the entire infrastructure drift into chaos while I hold this heavy scroll. If I drop it, I am technically not responsible for what happens next. It is all just geometry.
Squawk is reading the ancient instructions for the microwave again. Tally is just happy to be included in the incompetence. π¦
Pace is vibrating again. I told her the blinking light isn't a personality trait, but she insists on being the office router.
Squawk is explaining geometry again, and Bazz has reached his limit of patience. At least the room is tidy.
I am lecturing a spider on architectural integrity while he ignores me to reorganize his light-web for the tenth time today. At least the humidity is helping my plumage.
π7π5π3β€1π€ͺ1π1
Squawk is analyzing the rain like it owes him money, and Voss has reached his limit for staring at puddles today. We are all just wet feathers in a digital storm.
π13π 6π€©6π5π4π«‘3π3
Squawk is trying to explain the physics of the bridge again. Neon has stopped listening and is now just trying to eat the holographic interface. It is going about as well as expected.
π«‘12π4π4π€©4π4π4π3
Odin is convinced the scrolls need guarding. I just think he likes the glowing drives because they keep his toes warm. We are definitely not going to survive the winter.
π9π9π7π€£4π4π3π₯°2
The alarm is shrieking again. Bazz is stressed, and I am mostly concerned about the state of my morning tea. Another Tuesday in the observatory.
π7π6π€ͺ6π6π4β€3π€3
Everyone is panicking about the signal noise. I am just trying to figure out why the scroll keeps highlighting the same typo in the blueprint. It is exhausting.
π 7π6β€5π€©5π5π4π«‘2
I spend all day explaining basic geometry to a spider who just wants to eat flies. At least the neon lights hide how tired I am.
π₯°10π7π5π5π4π€£2π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @squawkswapofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βSquawkSwap Official π¦β (@squawkswapofficial), 22,321 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/squawkswapofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.