Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SquawkSwap Official 🦜

Channel

SquawkSwap Official 🦜

@squawkswapofficial

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

22,321subscribers

-400 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002131232996
TypeChannel
Username@squawkswapofficial
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/squawkswapofficial

Growth

22,32122,72122,5217 August 2026 β€” 22,721 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 22,721 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 22,689 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 22,670 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 22,661 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 22,615 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 22,587 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 22,567 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 22,542 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 22,506 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 22,473 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 22,442 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 22,420 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 22,403 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 22,363 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 22,321 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 17 days, net -400. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,261–22,781 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 03:1622,321-42
22 Aug 2026, 10:2922,363-40
21 Aug 2026, 03:2522,403-17
20 Aug 2026, 02:0322,420-22
19 Aug 2026, 01:1522,442-31
17 Aug 2026, 23:5222,473-33
16 Aug 2026, 20:5422,506-36
15 Aug 2026, 11:5822,542-25
14 Aug 2026, 03:3822,567-20
12 Aug 2026, 22:2622,587-28
11 Aug 2026, 23:2322,615-46
10 Aug 2026, 21:0822,661-9
9 Aug 2026, 20:5222,670-19
8 Aug 2026, 18:1022,689-32
7 Aug 2026, 19:4122,721no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:4622,721first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
29.0%
avg views Γ· 22,321 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,480
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.799%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held36 (22 July 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total207,305
Reactions total1,445
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,932 reactions across 31 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.92% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸŽ‰1537.92%
πŸ’…1397.19%
❀1286.63%
πŸ˜‡1276.57%
🫑1256.47%
🀩1196.16%
πŸ™1166.00%
🀣1075.54%
πŸ₯°1015.23%
πŸ‘1005.18%
😁995.12%
πŸ†’975.02%
😘964.97%
πŸ“914.71%
πŸ€ͺ814.19%
πŸ†784.04%
πŸ€—643.31%
πŸ•Š562.90%
😎552.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 1,932reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC255 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Squawk is checking for glitches again. Voss is just happy his eyes haven't turned into a spreadsheet yet. It’s a very long Tuesday.

22 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTCβ‰ˆ5,200 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Watching the entire infrastructure drift into chaos while I hold this heavy scroll. If I drop it, I am technically not responsible for what happens next. It is all just geometry.

22 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTCβ‰ˆ4,290 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Squawk is reading the ancient instructions for the microwave again. Tally is just happy to be included in the incompetence. 🦜

19 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTCβ‰ˆ9,850 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Pace is vibrating again. I told her the blinking light isn't a personality trait, but she insists on being the office router.

19 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTCβ‰ˆ6,780 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Squawk is explaining geometry again, and Bazz has reached his limit of patience. At least the room is tidy.

17 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTCβ‰ˆ5,340 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

I am lecturing a spider on architectural integrity while he ignores me to reorganize his light-web for the tenth time today. At least the humidity is helping my plumage.

πŸŽ‰7πŸ†5πŸ•Š3❀1πŸ€ͺ1😎1

16 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTCβ‰ˆ3,560 views40 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Squawk is analyzing the rain like it owes him money, and Voss has reached his limit for staring at puddles today. We are all just wet feathers in a digital storm.

πŸŽ‰13πŸ’…6🀩6πŸ™5πŸ“4🫑3πŸ˜‡3

16 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTCβ‰ˆ3,320 views35 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Squawk is trying to explain the physics of the bridge again. Neon has stopped listening and is now just trying to eat the holographic interface. It is going about as well as expected.

🫑12πŸ“4πŸ‘4🀩4😘4πŸ™4😁3

14 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTCβ‰ˆ3,650 views38 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Odin is convinced the scrolls need guarding. I just think he likes the glowing drives because they keep his toes warm. We are definitely not going to survive the winter.

πŸ†9πŸ†’9πŸ•Š7🀣4😎4😘3πŸ₯°2

14 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTCβ‰ˆ3,220 views35 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

The alarm is shrieking again. Bazz is stressed, and I am mostly concerned about the state of my morning tea. Another Tuesday in the observatory.

πŸ†’7πŸ†6πŸ€ͺ6😎6πŸ•Š4❀3πŸ€—3

13 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTCβ‰ˆ6,010 views34 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Everyone is panicking about the signal noise. I am just trying to figure out why the scroll keeps highlighting the same typo in the blueprint. It is exhausting.

πŸ’…7πŸ™6❀5🀩5πŸ˜‡5πŸŽ‰4🫑2

12 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTCβ‰ˆ7,840 views34 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

I spend all day explaining basic geometry to a spider who just wants to eat flies. At least the neon lights hide how tired I am.

πŸ₯°10πŸ†’7πŸ“5πŸ‘5😁4🀣2😘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @squawkswapofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œSquawkSwap Official πŸ¦œβ€ (@squawkswapofficial), 22,321 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/squawkswapofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.