done, check your wallets 💛
custom 541819708180428156312,100

Channel
@notcoin
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
9,200,677subscribers
-29,353 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002007141958 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @notcoin @notcoin_scam |
| Created | 13 November 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notcoin |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 5 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @cultofnot/1612 Jul 2024, 18:41 UTC | @notcoin/647 · this entry12 Jul 2024, 18:47 UTC | 1.00 | 6 minutes |
| @cultofnot/1713 Jul 2024, 13:58 UTC | @notcoin/648 · this entry13 Jul 2024, 13:59 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @notcoin/654 · this entry16 Jul 2024, 12:48 UTC | @cultofnot/1816 Jul 2024, 12:50 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @cultofnot/2017 Jul 2024, 18:40 UTC | @notcoin/656 · this entry17 Jul 2024, 18:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @cultofnot/5616 Aug 2024, 10:39 UTC | @notcoin/705 · this entry16 Aug 2024, 10:39 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @cultofnot/9510 Sept 2024, 14:17 UTC | @notcoin/741 · this entry11 Sept 2024, 21:08 UTC | 1.00 | 31 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @cultofnot | 19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @cultofnot (12–7) |
| @notpixel_channel | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @notpixel_channel (8–4) |
| @builders | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 46 minutes | this entry (6–1) |
| @durov | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 27 minutes | @durov (5–0) |
| @lostdogscoeng | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 87 minutes | @lostdogscoeng (9–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 26 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 300 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 November 2023 to 4 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 9,200,677 | +196 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 9,200,481 | -3,725 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 9,204,206 | -1,642 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 9,205,848 | -3,081 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 9,208,929 | -488 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 9,209,417 | -4,107 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 9,213,524 | +309 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 9,213,215 | -4,945 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 9,218,160 | -1,982 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 9,220,142 | -112 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 9,220,254 | -3,855 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 9,224,109 | -1,391 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 9,225,500 | -3,898 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 9,229,398 | -710 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:40 | 9,230,108 | -151 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 9,230,259 | +229 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 9,230,030 | first reading |
1,066 posts held, back to 13 November 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,073 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 1,066 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65,820 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5418197081804281563 | 31,100 | 47.3% | |
| custom 5330131801056768633 | 24,950 | 37.9% | |
| custom 5460645510605994881 | 6,420 | 9.75% | |
| custom 5460786759195458216 | 3,350 | 5.09% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 979 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,899,980reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 January 2024 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
done, check your wallets 💛
custom 541819708180428156312,100
👻👻 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥 the first emoji game on telegram 🫥 pass levels with minimum moves 🫥 create your own, share it with friends 🫥 probably nothing, as usual 👻👻 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥 just have fun 👻👻 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 /exe
custom 54181970818042815637,680
your gameboy is calling enter the dungeon 👻👻 😆
custom 54181970818042815634,150
NOT TON 🫡
custom 54181970818042815633,960
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 54181970818042815633,210
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 53301318010567686333,670
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53301318010567686332,510
🎲
custom 53301318010567686332,900
tired of new listings? sorry not sorry
custom 53301318010567686332,780
EVM degens, CZ believers, perp maxis Notcoin is on Aster DEX now NOT for trade 💎
custom 53301318010567686332,240
just fyi if you ordered a teddy bear toy from toygers (a company that disappeared with the pre-order money), please check @notcoin_bot we have something for you 💛
custom 53301318010567686332,480
Video, posted without a caption
custom 53301318010567686331,470
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,066 posts we hold for @notcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 3,045 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 243 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@notcoin named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1,045 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
11 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Notcoin Community” (@notcoin), 9,200,677 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.