Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Analytic Z

Channel

Crypto Analytic Z

@CryptoAnalyticZ

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31,209subscribers

-5,698 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001169481558
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoAnalyticZ
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoAnalyticZ

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 93 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CryptoVIPsignalTA/2544028 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC@CryptoAnalyticZ/2013 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoVIPsignalTA/254523 Sept 2026, 11:48 UTC@CryptoAnalyticZ/2024 · this entry3 Sept 2026, 11:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoVIPsignalTA/2548413 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC@CryptoAnalyticZ/2057 · this entry13 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoVIPsignalTA/2549617 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTC@CryptoAnalyticZ/2069 · this entry17 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoVIPsignalTA/2555127 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC@CryptoAnalyticZ/2118 · this entry27 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoVIPsignalTA/2565221 Oct 2026, 17:01 UTC@CryptoAnalyticZ/2167 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 17:01 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@CryptoVIPsignalTA191 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@CryptoVIPsignalTA (189–2)
@tradingcoach119 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutesthis entry (99–20)
@TCGFORYOU20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@TCGFORYOU (18–2)
@thecryptoexpress16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@thecryptoexpress (14–2)
@Cryptoinnercycles13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0013 minutesthis entry (11–2)
@RG_Analitics10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@RG_Analitics (9–1)
@RoseVipSignal5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 238 of the 252 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 242 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 93 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @tirangaa_vip. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 93 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Coingraph | News
@CoingraphNews · Channel
719,901 subscribers
Crypto Inner Circle®
@Cryptoinnercycles · Channel
401,854 subscribers
AI Watch 🏴
@headlines · Channel
335,535 subscribers
Fat Pig Signals
@Fat_Pigs_Signals · Channel
319,127 subscribers
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · Channel
314,216 subscribers
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · Channel
247,150 subscribers
Bitcoin
@bitcoin · Channel
181,226 subscribers
Coin Bureau
@CoinBureau · Channel
114,494 subscribers
CRYPTO CLASSICS
@CryptoClassics · Channel
110,525 subscribers
Ian Crypto Trades (est. 2015)
@Iancryptotrade1x · Channel
107,971 subscribers
JACOB CRYPTO BURY ®
@JacobCryptoClanDiscord · Channel
87,583 subscribers
XM Crypto News 🔥📈🚨💰
@Xmcryptonews · Channel
78,910 subscribers
Trading Crypto Guide ™
@TCGFORYOU · Channel
74,322 subscribers
Trading Coach
@tradingcoach · Channel
68,905 subscribers
Bitunix Trading Signals
@Bitunix_Trades · Channel
68,158 subscribers
CRYPTO NEWS
@cryptocurrency_media · Channel
63,684 subscribers
SatoshiSlice
@orangesats3 · Channel
57,999 subscribers
Chain Insights
@chainscoop · Channel
56,298 subscribers
CryptoWorldNews
@CryptoWorldNews · Channel
40,905 subscribers
Bartosz Goat Trading
@WDawson_Trades · Channel
35,840 subscribers
Crypto Pro Updates
@CryptoProUpdates · Channel
33,955 subscribers
Crypto+
@sport4_2_3_1 · Channel
31,378 subscribers
DMFirst Premium
@win82Club · Channel
30,598 subscribers
Crypto Master | Futures Signals
@binancemaster_trader · Channel
30,551 subscribers
DROP SIGNALS
@drop_signals · Channel
29,126 subscribers
Whale Alerts
@Whale_Alerts_io · Channel
28,238 subscribers
Evening Trader Signals
@EveningTraderSignals · Channel
19,578 subscribers
Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold
@Signals2day · Channel
18,022 subscribers
CRYPTO - MAGAZINE
@cryptomagazine · Channel
17,387 subscribers
Did You Know
@Didyoureallyknow · Channel
16,071 subscribers
Ethereum Merge
@Ethereum_Merge · Channel
15,891 subscribers
Binance Futures/Bybit/OKX/Kucoin/Bitget Signals & Spot
@cryptoheistsignall · Channel
15,218 subscribers
MODZYY !!
@tirangaa_vip · Channel
15,111 subscribers
Bitcoin Magazine
@Bitcoin_Magazine · Channel
14,331 subscribers
GAMEFI Launches
@GameFiLaunches · Channel
13,475 subscribers
Bitcoin ™️ | BTC | News
@bitcoinnews · Channel
12,391 subscribers
Mudrex Crypto Insights
@mudrexinsights · Channel
11,484 subscribers
Kucoin Big Pump
@KucoinBigpump · Channel
11,421 subscribers
FP Markets
@fpmarketsroom · Channel
11,400 subscribers
Crypto Bitcoin News TG
@CryptoBitcoinNewsTG · Channel
11,351 subscribers
Anna Calls
@AnnaCalls · Channel
11,323 subscribers
HKCM
@HKCMhopf · Channel
11,271 subscribers
🔹Crypto Trading Reports🔹
@Crypto_Trading_Reports · Channel
10,326 subscribers
KAORI🍉channel
@Kaori_watermelon · Channel
8,492 subscribers
CryptoPulse Global Signals
@Superfutures01 · Channel
8,012 subscribers
Crypto News 🌍 | Global Updates 🗞️🗞️ 📰
@cryptostuffs001 · Channel
7,858 subscribers
AAPKA INVESTMENTS
@aapka_investments · Channel
7,683 subscribers
Crypto News Bitcoin Ethereum Tron Solana Pump.Fun
@Crypto_News_Bitcoin_Ethereum · Channel
7,598 subscribers
Signals Crypto Insights Profits
@CryptoPumpTranding · Channel
6,941 subscribers
Ethereum ™️ | ETH | News
@ethereumnews · Channel
6,840 subscribers

42 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

31,20936,90734,0586 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -5,698. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,354–37,762 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:0131,209-136
9 Nov 2026, 09:3631,345-85
8 Nov 2026, 03:0731,430-44
6 Nov 2026, 22:5631,474-61
5 Nov 2026, 20:0031,535-53
4 Nov 2026, 22:2631,588-126
3 Nov 2026, 20:1531,714-360
2 Nov 2026, 20:1632,074-38
1 Nov 2026, 18:1832,112-63
31 Oct 2026, 15:0932,175-79
30 Oct 2026, 15:1032,254-311
29 Oct 2026, 17:3532,565-54
28 Oct 2026, 15:4932,619-33
27 Oct 2026, 12:2532,652-57
26 Oct 2026, 10:2032,709-20
25 Oct 2026, 08:1932,729-47
24 Oct 2026, 10:1532,776-20
23 Oct 2026, 11:1832,796-42
22 Oct 2026, 14:0632,838-46
21 Oct 2026, 04:5732,884first reading

Engagement

260 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 31,209 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,540
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
67
of 260 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held260 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total572,510
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 21:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,830
Videos
≈1
Links
≈124

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC≈8,070 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

ZEC analysis Price is currently trading within a triangle pattern, and a breakout from this triangle will determine the next movement. It is advisable to wait for a clear breakout before taking any positions. Support Area $1040-$1080 ​

10 Nov 2026, 13:06 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

📉 BTC Market Update Bitcoin is trading near $75K after failing to sustain its move above $80K. 📊 ETF outflows have reached their highest level since early July, while short-term holders are close to breakeven. High leverage and demand for downside protection also point to continued market uncertainty. ⚠️ Selling pressure remains a concern. Watch how BTC reacts around $75K and stay cautious with leveraged positions…

10 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Bitcoin showed some upward movement but then reversed. The price is facing heavy selling pressure and needs to make a strong pullback. Currently, things are uncertain. ​

9 Nov 2026, 14:26 UTC≈11,300 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

📊 Market Leadership Shift Market leadership has rotated from metals to equities and now to Bitcoin this year. 🥇 Gold and silver led during Q1, US equities took over through spring and into July, while BTC has led the market over the past 10 weeks. 📈💪 This shift highlights Bitcoin’s improving relative strength and growing market momentum. ​

9 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC≈11,200 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🚀 Strategy continues its aggressive Bitcoin accumulation! Strategy has acquired 1,036 $BTC and repurchased $188 million worth of $STRC. ​

9 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Bitcoin broke below the support area, leading to heavy selling. Let’s see how the market reacts when the US market opens. We may see a retest of the $75,800-$76,200 area. ​

8 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC≈11,300 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

The Fed decides on rates again on October 28. Since the start of the year, WTI crude is up about 73%, and household inflation expectations have risen half a percentage point. Core inflation sits where it started the year, but September's CPI, covered here last week, came in above forecasts on h the annual headline and core rates. Yields have climbed too. The two-year Treasury yield, which tracks where traders expec…

8 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is still moving sideways and remains very choppy at the moment. There is not much to analyze, so wait for the breakout to occur. Price has wiped liquidity from previous lows, so now look for early signs of a reversal. ​

7 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

FET failed to break the upward move but instead broke below support, resulting in a drop after being retested from resistance. Price may take a shallow pullback and dump again, so go with the flow.` ​

7 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC≈6,860 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Bitcoin has had a fake out and now broken the key support, with price moving sideways in that area. Resistance is becoming increasingly strong and reliable, so a short-term liquidity hunt can happen, followed another downward move. ​

5 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

📊 BTC Market Update Traders are still active despite Bitcoin’s recent pullback. Before the August rally, trading volume had dropped to its lowest level since 2023. However, even after the recent retracement, volume remains above that level. 👉 This suggests sustained market interest and improving participation after months of low activity. ​

5 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC≈8,220 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

ADA has experienced spikes below support, indicating high leverage position liquidations. We may see a continuation of the upward movement from this point. ​

Showing the 12 most recent of 260 posts we hold for @CryptoAnalyticZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Analytic Z” (@CryptoAnalyticZ), 31,209 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoAnalyticZ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.