Longed
β€2π―1
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers

Channel
@bitcoinbrother
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
13,937subscribers
-187 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001498552432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bitcoinbrother |
| Description | BitcoinBrother β Crypto & Technical Analysis Community We share market insights, charts, for educational purposes only. This is not financial advice. Details:https://forms.gle/7Jo8CmyHtfmUe3jS9 For vip fill the form and message @BitcoinBrotherAdmin |
| Created | Between 1 June 2019 and 31 August 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bitcoinbrother |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 13,937 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 13,954 | -45 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 13,999 | -28 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 14,027 | -60 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 14,087 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 14,103 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 14,124 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 14,124 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (29 July 2026 β 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 224,696 |
| Reactions total | 5,667 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 13 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
5,667 reactions across 46 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 1,321 | 23.3% | |
| π₯ | 1,105 | 19.5% | |
| π | 1,031 | 18.2% | |
| π₯° | 992 | 17.5% | |
| π | 826 | 14.6% | |
| π― | 151 | 2.66% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 148 | 2.61% | |
| π€ | 48 | 0.847% | |
| π± | 14 | 0.247% | |
| π³ | 12 | 0.212% | |
| π | 11 | 0.194% | |
| π | 8 | 0.141% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 5,667reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Longed
β€2π―1
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Mini Scalp Scalp Trade BTC/USDT Long Leverage Cross 100x Entry: 62980, 62580 Targets: 63180, 63380, 63580, 63780, 63980, 64180, 64380, 64580, 64780, 64980 SL: 62430 By Enjisir Another Scalp
β€3π1π₯1
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Yesterday Free signal is also vaild π°
β€38π₯23π19π19π₯°17π€2
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
New signal sent to vip members for btc trade !π°β€οΈ. @Enjisir
π₯20π₯°19β€18π18π17π€8
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Expecting more upside @Enjisir
π31π₯°26π17β€15π₯12
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Pumping more πͺ
π₯29π21π20π₯°19β€18
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Pump coming
β€37π25π₯22π₯°22π12π€4π1
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Entry 2 hit now, hopefully 65-66k @Enjisir
β€43π37π32π₯30π₯°27
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯33π₯°27β€26π26π16π―5
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Pump itβ€οΈπ₯
β€30π22π₯°17π16π₯14π±2
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Photo, posted without a caption
β€39π₯30π29π₯°25π15
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Mini Scalp Scalp Trade BTC/USDT Long Leverage Cross 100x Entry: 63600, 63200 Targets: 63800, 64000, 64200, 64400, 64600, 64800, 65000, 65200, 65400, 65600, 65800 SL: 62810 By Enjisir Another Scalp
β€24π₯14π13π12π₯°3π2π±1
Signed EnjiSir | π©βοΈ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @bitcoinbrother. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you want more free signals?π―
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBitcoin Brother Signals π― | Beware Of Scammersβ (@bitcoinbrother), 13,937 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitcoinbrother.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.