Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
7,580 average views per post against 14,971 subscribers โ an engagement rate of 50.6%. Across the 3,739 registered channels in the same cohort โ 10,004โ31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in English โ the middle half sit between 1.80% and 10.1%, with a median of 4.84%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (30 August 2026 โ 29 September 2026)
Posts measured
20 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 20 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
151,630
Mature posts only
52.2% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
ยฑ0.194% of the figure, from Telegramโs rounding
Post language
English ยท 100.0% of the windowโs posts
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร away from that cohortโs median โ above it โ on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 29 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +847. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 11,022โ15,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 08:21
14,971
+3,434
16 Sept 2026, 02:59
11,537
-47
14 Sept 2026, 08:57
11,584
-40
12 Sept 2026, 18:38
11,624
-47
10 Sept 2026, 15:37
11,671
-69
7 Sept 2026, 15:37
11,740
-1,856
4 Sept 2026, 18:00
13,596
+8
3 Sept 2026, 01:33
13,588
-30
1 Sept 2026, 23:48
13,618
-25
31 Aug 2026, 22:37
13,643
-17
30 Aug 2026, 21:39
13,660
-21
29 Aug 2026, 23:18
13,681
-22
28 Aug 2026, 22:38
13,703
-22
27 Aug 2026, 20:33
13,725
-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:27
13,727
-19
26 Aug 2026, 00:47
13,746
-5
25 Aug 2026, 01:13
13,751
-13
23 Aug 2026, 13:36
13,764
-4
22 Aug 2026, 00:57
13,768
-17
20 Aug 2026, 15:53
13,785
first reading
Engagement
196 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
50.6%
avg views รท 14,971 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,580
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 196 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
196 (29 July 2026 โ 2 September 2026)
Views total
151,630
Reactions total
2,549
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
24,333 reactions across 195 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
5,446
22.4%
๐ฅ
4,732
19.4%
๐ฅฐ
4,520
18.6%
๐
4,502
18.5%
๐
4,344
17.9%
๐ฏ
222
0.912%
โคโ๐ฅ
192
0.789%
๐ค
151
0.621%
๐ฑ
130
0.534%
๐ณ
48
0.197%
๐
28
0.115%
๐
18
0.074%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 195 of the 196 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 24,333 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 195 we hold a reading for ยท 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @bitcoinbrother. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 196 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Successful plan. We will see shorts untill 73-74k @Enjisir
โค42๐35๐32๐ฅฐ31๐ฅ24๐ฏ1
Signed EnjiSir | ๐ฉโ๏ธ | WILL NOT ASK FOR MONEY | Beware Of Scammers
Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @bitcoinbrother. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Jusko Trader ๐ @juskotraderreal1 ยท 179,387 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 24 August 2026
Jusko Trader @juskotraderreal ยท 80,772 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here โ alongside 88 others โ read 24 August 2026
Crypto Heavenยฎ @CryptoHeaven ยท 46,388 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 27 August 2026
Verified Crypto Traders ยฎ @VerifiedCryptoTradersgram ยท 21,741 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 43 here โ alongside 42 others โ read 22 September 2026
CFTrader Original Public VIP @CFTopTrading ยท 1,716 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here โ alongside 88 others โ read 22 August 2026
Scalping_300% @Scalping_300 ยท 43,615 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here โ alongside 75 others โ read 28 August 2026
GG-Shรธt. Indicator & Signals @ggshot ยท 93,344 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here โ alongside 86 others โ read 17 August 2026
Crypto Trading Free Signals @binance_Free_Crypto_Signal ยท 26,284 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 6 September 2026
CRYPTO PUMPS @cryptopumps ยท 42,365 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 74 here โ alongside 73 others โ read 28 August 2026
King @crypto_futures_king ยท 8 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 30 August 2026
Trading_mania_crypto ยฎ๏ธ @tradingmaniacccrypto ยท 20,669 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 26 September 2026
Trading Crypto Guide โข @TCGFORYOU ยท 74,783 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here โ alongside 94 others โ read 19 August 2026
CRYPTO GEEK @cryptO0_g_e_e_k ยท 26,649 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 12 September 2026
Crypto Prediction Official @cryptoprediction ยท 33,001 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here โ alongside 85 others โ read 28 August 2026
CRYPTO HUSTLE @Crypt0_Hustle ยท 28,774 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 9 September 2026
Crypto Pulse Matrixยฎ @CryptoPulseMatrix ยท 29,558 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here โ alongside 70 others โ read 8 September 2026
BINANCE FUTURE CRYPTO TRADING @Crypto_Future_Free_Signals_Tradi ยท 44,025 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 28 August 2026
Gorilla Crypto @gorilla_crypto ยท 192,465 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here โ alongside 82 others โ read 12 August 2026
๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ฐ @Binance_PROs ยท 34,077 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here โ alongside 70 others โ read 3 September 2026
ESTR - EAT SLEEP TRADE REPEAT @ESTROFFICIAL ยท 48,158 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 76 here โ alongside 75 others โ read 26 August 2026
Crypto TA King ๐ @Crypto_TA_King_Verified ยท 91,559 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 16 August 2026
NOOR CRYPTO @noorcrypto ยท 57,392 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 16 September 2026
Boom_Boom_Billionaires @BBB_Signals ยท 40,584 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here โ alongside 71 others โ read 30 August 2026
Whales_Pumps @Whales_Pumps ยท 53,405 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โBitcoin Brother Signals ๐ฏ | Beware Of Scammersโ (@bitcoinbrother), 14,971 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitcoinbrother.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.