Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold

Channel

Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold

@Signals2day

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,931subscribers

-19,934 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001813598413
TypeChannel
Username@Signals2day
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Signals2day

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

16,93136,86526,8986 August 2026 — 36,865 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,865 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,799 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,262 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,953 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,454 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,189 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,012 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,438 subscribers15 August 2026 — 33,891 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,465 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,158 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,657 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,282 subscribers22 August 2026 — 31,075 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,413 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,150 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,774 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,640 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,506 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,560 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,378 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,893 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,761 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,472 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,320 subscribers6 September 2026 — 24,909 subscribers9 September 2026 — 23,627 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,629 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,891 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,289 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,931 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -19,934. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,941–39,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:3916,931-1,358
15 Sept 2026, 21:4018,289-1,602
14 Sept 2026, 01:5819,891-1,738
12 Sept 2026, 06:5921,629-1,998
9 Sept 2026, 23:4023,627-1,282
6 Sept 2026, 16:5624,909-411
4 Sept 2026, 02:1425,320-1,152
2 Sept 2026, 17:3726,472-289
1 Sept 2026, 13:1326,761-132
31 Aug 2026, 09:4626,893-485
30 Aug 2026, 06:2427,378-1,182
29 Aug 2026, 07:1228,560-946
28 Aug 2026, 03:4729,506-134
27 Aug 2026, 03:1929,640-134
26 Aug 2026, 03:1629,774-376
25 Aug 2026, 05:3530,150-263
24 Aug 2026, 04:3430,413-662
22 Aug 2026, 11:5831,075-1,207
20 Aug 2026, 23:0132,282-375
19 Aug 2026, 00:2232,657first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 16,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,390
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.252%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held52 (20 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total37,281
Reactions total94
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

611 reactions across 52 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤26343.0%
👍12620.6%
🔥9615.7%
🐳7211.8%
👏142.29%
💯142.29%
🥰71.15%
😁60.982%
❤‍🔥30.491%
👌20.327%
😱20.327%
🙏20.327%
🍾10.164%
💩10.164%
🕊10.164%
😍10.164%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 611 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC61 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

We expect price to move toward the upper boundary of the channel. If valid confirmations appear, short positions targeting the lower boundary can be considered. If the channel breaks from either side, we will wait for a pullback to the breakout point before entering in the direction of the break. #SOLUSDT USDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

❤3🐳2👍1

3 Sept 2026, 08:12 UTC78 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

SHORT POSITION EUR/USD ENT : 1.16041 TP : 1.15958 SL : 1.16080 RISK : 1% #EURUSD #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

🔥3❤1🐳1💯1

1 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC306 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Once the ascending channel is broken and price closes below 2.355, followed by a pullback to the breakout point, short positions can be considered if the required confirmations appear. Otherwise, we will wait for a potential second upward spike. #ETHUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

❤5🔥2🐳1👍1

31 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC288 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Initial expectation vs. actual price delivery 👇 Initially, I expected price to complete the second leg in the direction marked in red, reaching the lower FVG. However, instead of extending directly into that move, price formed a smaller internal second leg, as marked in green, and delivered the expected displacement within the internal structure. This is a good reminder that the market doesn't always complete the lar…

❤3👍3🐳1💯1

31 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC269 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

After tapping the OTE levels, price is expected to reverse and clear the previous short-term high located at the 0 Fibonacci level. #BCHUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

❤4👍2🐳1🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC257 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

SHORT POSITION EUR/USD ENT : 1.15974 TP : 1.15846 SL : 1.16017 RISK : 1% #EURUSD #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

❤4💯2🐳1👍1

30 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC294 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

After price breaks above 0.0861, we can look for long entries targeting the FVG upon receiving the required confirmations. #ZBTUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

❤3👍3💯2🐳1

29 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC≈10,900 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

If price breaks above 11,250 and then pulls back to it, we can look for short positions targeting the second leg down. #LINKUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

❤6🔥3💯2🐳1👍1

29 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈13,200 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Full Target 🎯 #MONUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

❤6👍4🐳1💯1

28 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈11,600 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$LTCUSDT is forming an inverse cup and handle pattern, so we might see a bounce from the support neckline or a dump if it breaks. Keep an eye on it.

👍5❤4🐳1

26 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈5,120 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Most people overcomplicate wealth building in crypto All you actually need is $500 and patience $500 $1K $2K $4K $8K $16K $32K $64K $128K $256K $512K $1.02M 11 doubles That's it The math never changed people just stopped believing it

❤6🔥3👍2🐳1💯1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @Signals2day. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Gem 💎
@cryptogem · 109,074
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
Krypto | Finanzen | Politik
@kryptodeutsch · 62,557
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
Crypto Pro Updates
@CryptoProUpdates · 25,546
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
CryptoWorldNews
@CryptoWorldNews · 42,335
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
Financial World Updates
@FinancialWorldUpdates · 23,448
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
Analytics Insight
@analyticsinsightmag · 34,642
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Bitcoin Insights
@Bitcoin_Insights · 32,384
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Crypto | Bitcoin | Ethereum | Altcoin | News
@Cryptocurrency_Inside · 43,158
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
Bitcoin Industry
@bitcoin_industry · 440,579
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Daily™
@officialcryptodaily · 36,684
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold” (@Signals2day), 16,931 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Signals2day.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.