https://www.youtube.com/live/oD2HcW8D7ZQ?si=BUtGk8zy4dULnDT6
❤4

Channel
@cryptojargon69
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
36,666subscribers
-101 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001283912002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptojargon69 |
| Description | I will Never ask you to send me any Crypto those are all SCAMMERS, I will never text you first! Contact Tg- @teamjargon 📥cryptojargon69@gmail.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptojargon69 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 36,666 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 36,680 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 36,706 | -26 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 36,732 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 36,742 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 36,753 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 36,767 | first reading |
61 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 61 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 134,463 |
| Reactions total | 612 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
612 reactions across 54 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 199 | 32.5% | |
| 👍 | 116 | 19.0% | |
| 😁 | 101 | 16.5% | |
| 🔥 | 91 | 14.9% | |
| 🤯 | 35 | 5.72% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 5.56% | |
| 🤔 | 30 | 4.90% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 612reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/live/oD2HcW8D7ZQ?si=BUtGk8zy4dULnDT6
❤4
🚨 A trader has opened a $75,700,000 BTC short with 40X leverage. Liquidation Price: $64,400. WHAT DOES THIS WHALE KNOW? 👀📉 📰 X | Youtube | Instagram
🤔7😁5👏3🤯3❤1
🇺🇸BREAKING: President Trump says the U.S. has “total control” over the Strait of Hormuz. “I think we will keep it.” 📰 X | Youtube | Instagram
😁12👍5
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 U.S. inflation cooled to 3.4% in July as gasoline prices declined. Headline CPI rose 0.1% month-over-month, while core inflation came in at 2.5% year-over-year. The numbers matched expectations.
❤7👏3🔥2😁2👍1
🇮🇳 India’s SEBI is developing an AI system called SUDARSAN to monitor what financial influencers promote across social media. 📰 X | Youtube | Instagram
😁15❤8👏2🤔2👍1
🚨BREAKING: Harmony's $ONE has crashed over 35% after a suspected exploit minted roughly 4 billion tokens worth around $3,160,000, equal to 26% of its previous supply. 📰 X | Youtube | Instagram
🤯5👍2😁2
CPI lands tonight expecting cooler inflation, which should help BTC. But Brent crude just hit $90 on six straight days of gains. The number tonight might already be outdated. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2087432655092818104?s=20
❤7
⚡️ GM! US-Iran impasse & rising oil prices weighing on markets. US stocks dipped: S&P 500 -0.32%, Nasdaq -0.60%. Bitcoin also pulled back to $63,690.00 (-0.63%). Keep an eye on upcoming inflation data.
👍5
Apna crypto wallet kholo aur transaction history dekho. Kaafi zero-value transactions milenge similar addresses se. Ye hackers hain jo wait kar rahe hain ki tum galti se unka address copy karo. https://www.instagram.com/p/Db50M6YpqkJ/
❤14🤯3👏2
Strong password, 2FA on, seed phrase safe - and the account still gets drained in 60 seconds. Turns out the attacker doesn't need to break your 2FA, he just needs you to hand it to him. This video talks about the 5 ways that scammers use, including the digital arrest scam the government had to run ads about. https://youtu.be/lD03LboOH3Y
🔥5❤2👍2
SOL is down 75% from its peak. Meanwhile Solana now handles 95% of all tokenized stock trading on-chain, and BlackRock runs a fund on it. Price and usage now tell two completely different stories. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2087118200823849086?s=20
❤12
BTC lost $65K three days after breaking it. Strategy sold 1,690 BTC last week, its first sale in months. Tomorrow's CPI decides if this was a fakeout or just a pause. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2087067464324751515?s=20
👍11❤5🔥1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @cryptojargon69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 366,854 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Jargon” (@cryptojargon69), 36,666 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptojargon69.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.