Channel
@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,632subscribers
-776 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001204635747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 15,632 | -114 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 15,746 | -22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 15,768 | -32 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 15,800 | -44 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 15,844 | -25 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 15,869 | -56 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 15,925 | -40 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 15,965 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:42 | 15,982 | -23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 16,005 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 16,021 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 16,032 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 16,044 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 16,057 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 16,065 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 16,078 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 16,093 | -49 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 16,142 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 16,162 | -19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 16,181 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 33 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
56 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 46.4% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 30.4% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 16.1% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This is exactly why I expect $ETH to eventually trade below its 2022 low. The current structure is roughly 40% larger than the previous comparable structure. Therefore, the corrective impulse should also be proportionally larger than the previous one. If we apply that 40% difference to the 2022 low: $880 − 40% = $528 That gives us a potential bottom around $528. And this is exactly why I’ve been pointing to the …
Let me explain how this works. Since 2025, $ETH has been developing an almost exact replica of the structure we saw in 2022. The key difference is that the current structure is roughly 40% larger than the previous one. Based on the wave count and relative size, we can see that in the 2022 structure, the first major impulse delivered approximately +184%. In the current structure, the corresponding impulse reached ar…
$SOL Swing Sell Setup: SOL is approaching a critical area within the larger corrective structure. Based on the fractal and wave structure shown on the chart, I’m watching for a potential swing short entry between $107–112. This area could act as the next major rejection zone before the next downside phase develops. My current expectation: • Swing Sell Range: $107–112 • Expected bottoming range: $17–25
❤4
$BTC Instead of simply copy-pasting the 2022 cycle onto 2026, I’m focusing on how and when the real bottoming process develops, based on the similarities observed across previous cycles. The current Bitcoin price action is showing a structure very similar to what I outlined around the $30K area. The goal isn’t to force the current market into an old cycle template, but to identify the structural similarities, timin…
❤2
$ETH it’s time to open your eyes. The correction toward $600–$700 could be the most important move for ETH’s long-term future. Price is currently moving within a larger structure while simultaneously developing a similar structure inside it. This move toward $600–$700 would fully complete both structures at the same time. Only after this final reset is complete, I believe ETH will be structurally ready to enter it…
❤2
$BTC Here’s my final view and the chart behind it: After spending a long time analyzing the market from different perspectives, my broader view remains unchanged. No short-term rally can change my mind. From the beginning, I have expected the current cycle to follow a structure similar to the 2013–2015 bearish phase. I believe the current price action is forming the same type of trap we saw during that cycle — a …
👍5❤3
$BTC So, what’s the difference between these two charts/structures? Almost none. The main difference is the market environment. During 2013–2015, liquidity was much lower, which is clearly visible on the chart: almost every major move left long wicks. This indicates that the price was far more volatile and prone to sharp liquidity-driven spikes. The current structure is developing much more cleanly. We’re seeing …
❤1🔥1
$BTC Bitcoin is following a Triple Complex Corrective structure — a pattern described by legendary NeoWave analyst Glenn Neely. This same structure was already formed during the 2013–2015 Bitcoin cycle, and the current cycle appears to be following a remarkably similar path. The structure and sequence are aligning closely with the historical pattern, suggesting that Bitcoin may still have further corrective phases…
🔥1
Everything is going according to the plan. The current bearish cycle is likely to last more than one year, closely following the 2013–2015 bearish cycle. Back then, Bitcoin reached its cycle low after roughly 630 days of bearish structure. If the current cycle continues to follow the same pattern, I believe there is still significantly more time and downside ahead before the final bottom is reached.
$BTC The Current Cycle Structure Is Following the 2013–2015 Cycle Bitcoin is currently moving upward as part of a formation that closely resembles the structure developed during the 2013–2015 cycle. During that period, the market went through a complex sequence of rallies and corrections. Several recovery movements created the impression that the bearish phase was already over, while in reality, the larger correct…
$ETH We’ll start accumulating altcoins for the long term once ETH reaches the expected bottom range around $540–$600. Until then, every rally across altcoins should be treated as a relief rally within the broader bearish structure, with bearish continuation still expected afterward. Ethereum appears to be repeating the same large-scale structure we saw during the 2018–2020 cycle. Structure 1 has already been comp…
❤1
$BTC While many are already pointing to the bullish divergence on Bitcoin, similar to what appeared in the previous cycle, I’m also highlighting where the more significant, potentially “real” bullish divergence could actually develop.
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Embassy Official 📉📈” (@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0), 15,632 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.