Channel
@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,307subscribers
-101 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001204635747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 |
| Description | EXCLUSIVE CRYPTO TRADING CHANNEL 📊🥂 ⭐️ EXPERT ANALYSIS 📊 ⭐️ INSIDER TIPS 💰 ⭐️ MARKET UPDATE 📉📈 Contact- @Niru234 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 16,307 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 16,325 | -29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 16,354 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 16,370 | -19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 16,389 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 16,400 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 16,408 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (8 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,144 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
36 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 41.7% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 36.1% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$BTC While many are already pointing to the bullish divergence on Bitcoin, similar to what appeared in the previous cycle, I’m also highlighting where the more significant, potentially “real” bullish divergence could actually develop.
$BTC Cycle Structure: Previous Bitcoin cycles show a remarkably similar 3-wave downside structure. The declines were approximately −52%, −63% and −37%, which can broadly be interpreted as three ~50% waves, with the middle wave becoming significantly elongated. The current cycle appears to be developing in a similar way. The first −52% wave has already occurred. If the pattern continues, i expect the next move coul…
❤1
$TUT update: This setup is more about information than a direct buy or sell signal. We already have the first A → B → C structure, followed by a deeper decline and accumulation phase. From there, price made a strong impulsive move higher, and I’m using the same structural idea to project what could come next. If this structure plays out as expected, the current move could develop into another A → B → C formation, …
$TAKE Buy setup: The accumulation phase is still developing and has not yet been completed. So far, Structures 1 and 2 are complete, while Structure 3 is only around halfway through its development. What’s interesting is that each structure has followed a very similar price development, and the current structure is unfolding almost identically to the previous two. If this pattern continues, the current rally is li…
❤2
$COTI Update: The short entry has been filled, and price immediately dropped 28% from the entry. With the trade now well in profit, I’m moving the stop loss to breakeven to eliminate risk while letting the position run.
$COTI update: This rally appears to be nothing more than a temporary relief rally. In my opinion, it will eventually end with a new lower low before the market begins the next major bullish impulse. My preferred sell zone remains $0.01900–$0.02170. From there, I’ll be looking to position for a decline into the $0.0050–$0.0055 accumulation range. Once that target is reached, I’ll close my shorts and begin building …
$COTI Yes, exactly. I believe the current rally is only a temporary relief rally. After the larger correction is complete and price sets a new low, that’s when I expect the real long-term rally to begin—and that’s where I’ll be looking to build a position.
$COTI buy setup: The $0.0050–$0.0055 range is now my preferred buy zone for a potential relief rally. If price reacts from this area, I expect a recovery toward the $0.0580–$0.0610 sell range, where I’ll be watching for signs of exhaustion and bearish continuation. From there, the larger ABC structure could continue to unfold, eventually leading price into the final long-term accumulation range shown on the chart.…
$ZEC | Price Action Since 2017 After reviewing ZEC’s entire price history, I noticed something very interesting. The current price action continues to align with my expectations for a major bearish move. What’s even more interesting is that nothing new is happening with ZEC. The market isn’t creating a new pattern—it’s simply repeating the same behavior it has followed throughout its history. Each major cycle has …
❤2
$WIF buy setup WIF continues to respect its broader bearish structure, and so far I don’t see enough confirmation that the long-term downtrend has ended. The $0.1500-$0.1600 range remains an attractive mid-term entry zone. However, any recovery from this area is currently viewed as a corrective move rather than the beginning of a new bullish trend. The $0.4300-$0.5000 range is the main area I’m watching for potent…
👍4
$BTC Must read full text carefully. Bitcoin has historically been associated with a 4-year cycle, but many assume that always means approximately 1 year of correction followed by 3 years of bullish expansion. History suggests the structure isn't that simple. The 2014–2018 cycle broke that pattern. Instead of a typical 1-year correction, Bitcoin spent approximately 89 weeks (623 days, or 1 year and 8–9 months) bui…
$ETH clean structure: As I mentioned in my previous posts, i’m expecting the current move to be a relief rally rather than the start of a new bullish trend. The structure is developing exactly within that scenario, with Phase 2 approaching the sell range before a potential bearish continuation. If this setup remains valid, the next leg lower could target the $1,415–$1,281 zone. https://www.tradingview.com/x/LYYzW…
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Embassy Official 📉📈” (@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0), 16,307 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.