$BTC 1D Update: Bitcoin’s current structure appears to align with the rules outlined in NeoWave theory. According to this interpretation, when a Flat develops with a C-wave failure, the preceding X-wave is most likely to take the form of a Triangle or a Monowave. The chart appears to fit this scenario: X-wave: A contracting triangle, consistent with the NeoWave pattern. Post-triangle advance: Price rallies to a n…

Channel
Bitcoin Embassy Official 📉📈
@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,895subscribers
-1,513 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001204635747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 |
| Description | EXCLUSIVE CRYPTO TRADING CHANNEL 📊🥂 ⭐️ EXPERT ANALYSIS 📊 ⭐️ INSIDER TIPS 💰 ⭐️ MARKET UPDATE 📉📈 Contact- @Niru234 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 21:07 | 14,895 | -25 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 03:20 | 14,920 | -26 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:39 | 14,946 | -19 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:11 | 14,965 | -14 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:25 | 14,979 | -19 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:50 | 14,998 | -17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:38 | 15,015 | -16 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:45 | 15,031 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:31 | 15,043 | -18 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 15,061 | -21 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:45 | 15,082 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 15,099 | -30 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 15,129 | -14 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 15,143 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:14 | 15,158 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 15,165 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 15,172 | -16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:05 | 15,188 | -23 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 15,211 | -15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 15,226 | first reading |
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.83%
- avg views ÷ 14,895 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 421
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (8 June 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,371 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 19:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,190
- Videos
- ≈50
- Links
- ≈702
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
52 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 42.3% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 32.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 17.3% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
$WLD LTF Update: WLD appears to be developing a complex corrective structure, with wave B potentially completed and wave C now expected to begin. This would be another corrective leg before the next upside impulse. My primary target for wave C is the $0.33–$0.31 zone, which could mark the completion of the entire corrective structure. If this scenario plays out as expected, WLD could then initiate a strong relief …
$SOL : LTF 4H The current SOL structure appears to be developing as a double zigzag under the NEoWave framework. One of the key features supporting this interpretation is the non-limiting triangle in the X-wave position, developing in the middle of the structure. According to the NEoWave framework, this type of triangle can occur within a double zigzag without terminating the larger corrective pattern. With both z…
$BNB LTF update: The current BNB structure appears to be developing as a triple combination under the NEoWave framework. Since the local lows, we can identify two zigzags, with each corrective phase separated by an X-wave, suggesting that the correction may be evolving into a more complex structure. What makes the current setup particularly interesting is the potential breakout structure developing near the highs.…
$SOL and $BNB are following similar structures as well. Just like BTC and other large caps, both appear to be developing structures similar to 2022 — but on a much larger scale due to the prolonged bearish cycle. I’ve shared my analysis of SOL and BNB many times, but let’s revisit my bottom targets: $BNB: $280–$320 $SOL: $20–$25 The structures remain similar. The difference is the time required to complete them.
$LTC 1W : If you remember, I’ve mentioned that large-cap altcoins that typically follow BTC are developing similar market structures — but on a much larger timescale. The reason? We’re dealing with a prolonged bearish cycle. Even when price follows a structure similar to 2022, each phase takes longer to develop. BTC itself is following the 2022 structure step by step, but with significantly more time required for e…
$ETH: The Layers of Cycles History rhymes — but there’s one crucial detail we must pay attention to. We all know the saying: history rhymes. But before assuming Ethereum will repeat a specific part of a previous cycle, we must first understand how its entire market structure works. Markets don’t consist of a single cycle. They contain multiple layers of cycles within cycles: micro-cycles within sub-cycles, sub-cyc…
$BTC : 4H Analysis Update: Bitcoin has reached the projected downside target zone. Original projection from $87,000: • Expected duration: 10–11 days • Projected correction: −8.8% • Target zone: $79,500–$79,600 Actual result: • Duration: 12 days, 20 hours • Actual correction: −8.65% • Lowest price reached: $79,700 on Binance Futures The price target was reached with remarkable accuracy, while the correction took s…
Have you ever tried inverting the chart? Honestly, it looks even better than the normal view. Sometimes flipping the chart makes the structure much easier to see. $BTC
$BTC : This current cycle could potentially become the longest bearish cycle in Bitcoin’s history. From the very beginning, I expected this cycle to follow the prolonged bearish structure of 2013–2015, lasting well over a year. ( See quoted post ) However, after analysing the current 1D structure, the market is now suggesting that this cycle could potentially last even longer than 2013–2015. What makes the compari…
$BTC : I’ve just revisited my analysis and noticed something remarkable: price is developing the same structure step by step. Both Structure 1 and Structure 2 are following an almost identical sequence of price action, with each corresponding move highlighted by the red circles and black arrows. The more I compare them, the clearer the similarities become. This isn’t just a resemblance in the overall formation — ev…
$BTC Sorry, but I don’t believe Bitcoin can even break into a new ATH without first going through a prolonged bearish phase within the current cycle. This is the thesis I’ve been explaining for the past few months. ( look at quoted post ) If you look at Bitcoin’s historical trend angles, the same structural progression has been playing out from the very beginning until today. After multiple cycles, these trend angl…
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tradingbycfai · 27,468
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
@tradingmaniacccrypto · 19,726
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
@Signals_futures_crypto_trading · 20,729
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 September 2026
@harmonicshark · 50,271
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 16,959
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,500
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 130,573
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@gorilla_crypto · 182,238
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,621
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
@Binance_PROs · 33,763
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
@ESTROFFICIAL · 47,622
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
@Official_GCR · 53,794
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@KingCryptoCalls · 293,797
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@BBB_Signals · 38,797
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 88,339
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 101,068
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@cryptoworldduptades · 163,015
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 September 2026
@WhalesCircle · 42,988
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
@Whales_Pumps · 53,478
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
@crypto_musk1 · 81,543
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@crypto_crown_signals · 21,712
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
@binance_360 · 100,868
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
@vip_profits · 22,610
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
@REALBEAST0 · 42,552
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Embassy Official 📉📈” (@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0), 14,895 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.