Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto News 🌍 | Global Updates 🗞️🗞️ 📰

Channel

Crypto News 🌍 | Global Updates 🗞️🗞️ 📰

@cryptostuffs001

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,858subscribers

-1,410 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002091833140
TypeChannel
Username@cryptostuffs001
Description🌐 Get the latest crypto updates, market trends & breaking blockchain news from around the world. 🪙 Fast • Reliable • Global 📢 Stay ahead — join Crypto News 🌍 Contact updates::@News_updates_001
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptostuffs001

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 93 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Xmcryptonews/902715 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC@cryptostuffs001/4399 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC1.002 minutes
@Xmcryptonews/904618 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC@cryptostuffs001/4415 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC1.0072 seconds
@Xmcryptonews/904818 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC@cryptostuffs001/4417 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC1.0018 minutes
@Xmcryptonews/908220 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC@cryptostuffs001/4445 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC1.0011 minutes
@Xmcryptonews/910621 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC@cryptostuffs001/4469 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC1.003 minutes
@Xmcryptonews/912825 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC@cryptostuffs001/4491 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC1.008 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Xmcryptonews47 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 minutes@Xmcryptonews (47–0)
@cryptocurrency_media19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutes@cryptocurrency_media (19–0)
@BanksCryptoCalls6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0020 minutes@BanksCryptoCalls (5–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 67 of the 71 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 56 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 93 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @tirangaa_vip. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 93 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Coingraph | News
@CoingraphNews · Channel
719,901 subscribers
Crypto Inner Circle®
@Cryptoinnercycles · Channel
401,854 subscribers
AI Watch 🏴
@headlines · Channel
335,540 subscribers
Fat Pig Signals
@Fat_Pigs_Signals · Channel
319,127 subscribers
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · Channel
314,043 subscribers
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · Channel
247,150 subscribers
Bitcoin
@bitcoin · Channel
181,226 subscribers
Coin Bureau
@CoinBureau · Channel
114,494 subscribers
CRYPTO CLASSICS
@CryptoClassics · Channel
110,321 subscribers
Ian Crypto Trades (est. 2015)
@Iancryptotrade1x · Channel
107,971 subscribers
JACOB CRYPTO BURY ®
@JacobCryptoClanDiscord · Channel
87,583 subscribers
XM Crypto News 🔥📈🚨💰
@Xmcryptonews · Channel
78,910 subscribers
Trading Crypto Guide ™
@TCGFORYOU · Channel
74,322 subscribers
Trading Coach
@tradingcoach · Channel
68,878 subscribers
Bitunix Trading Signals
@Bitunix_Trades · Channel
68,158 subscribers
CRYPTO NEWS
@cryptocurrency_media · Channel
63,672 subscribers
SatoshiSlice
@orangesats3 · Channel
57,999 subscribers
Chain Insights
@chainscoop · Channel
56,612 subscribers
CryptoWorldNews
@CryptoWorldNews · Channel
40,905 subscribers
Bartosz Goat Trading
@WDawson_Trades · Channel
35,840 subscribers
Crypto Pro Updates
@CryptoProUpdates · Channel
34,183 subscribers
Crypto+
@sport4_2_3_1 · Channel
31,378 subscribers
Crypto Analytic Z
@CryptoAnalyticZ · Channel
31,209 subscribers
DMFirst Premium
@win82Club · Channel
30,598 subscribers
Crypto Master | Futures Signals
@binancemaster_trader · Channel
30,527 subscribers
DROP SIGNALS
@drop_signals · Channel
29,126 subscribers
Whale Alerts
@Whale_Alerts_io · Channel
28,238 subscribers
Evening Trader Signals
@EveningTraderSignals · Channel
19,568 subscribers
Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold
@Signals2day · Channel
18,022 subscribers
CRYPTO - MAGAZINE
@cryptomagazine · Channel
17,386 subscribers
Did You Know
@Didyoureallyknow · Channel
16,071 subscribers
Ethereum Merge
@Ethereum_Merge · Channel
15,877 subscribers
Binance Futures/Bybit/OKX/Kucoin/Bitget Signals & Spot
@cryptoheistsignall · Channel
15,218 subscribers
MODZYY !!
@tirangaa_vip · Channel
15,111 subscribers
Bitcoin Magazine
@Bitcoin_Magazine · Channel
14,331 subscribers
GAMEFI Launches
@GameFiLaunches · Channel
13,467 subscribers
Bitcoin ™️ | BTC | News
@bitcoinnews · Channel
12,369 subscribers
Mudrex Crypto Insights
@mudrexinsights · Channel
11,484 subscribers
Kucoin Big Pump
@KucoinBigpump · Channel
11,419 subscribers
FP Markets
@fpmarketsroom · Channel
11,400 subscribers
Crypto Bitcoin News TG
@CryptoBitcoinNewsTG · Channel
11,339 subscribers
Anna Calls
@AnnaCalls · Channel
11,323 subscribers
HKCM
@HKCMhopf · Channel
11,271 subscribers
🔹Crypto Trading Reports🔹
@Crypto_Trading_Reports · Channel
10,326 subscribers
KAORI🍉channel
@Kaori_watermelon · Channel
8,492 subscribers
CryptoPulse Global Signals
@Superfutures01 · Channel
7,791 subscribers
AAPKA INVESTMENTS
@aapka_investments · Channel
7,683 subscribers
Crypto News Bitcoin Ethereum Tron Solana Pump.Fun
@Crypto_News_Bitcoin_Ethereum · Channel
7,598 subscribers
Signals Crypto Insights Profits
@CryptoPumpTranding · Channel
6,941 subscribers
Ethereum ™️ | ETH | News
@ethereumnews · Channel
6,840 subscribers

42 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

7,8589,2688,5637 August 2026 — 9,268 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,268 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,266 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,235 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,196 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,146 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,111 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,060 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,032 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,906 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,861 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,772 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,696 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,590 subscribers2 October 2026 — 8,430 subscribers8 October 2026 — 8,370 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,303 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,253 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,197 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,114 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,066 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,011 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,975 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,943 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,902 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,858 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -1,410. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,647–9,480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:457,858-44
6 Nov 2026, 20:097,902-41
4 Nov 2026, 04:167,943-32
1 Nov 2026, 04:497,975-36
29 Oct 2026, 07:468,011-55
26 Oct 2026, 08:378,066-48
23 Oct 2026, 02:078,114-83
19 Oct 2026, 18:218,197-56
16 Oct 2026, 17:588,253-50
13 Oct 2026, 21:158,303-67
8 Oct 2026, 06:388,370-60
2 Oct 2026, 04:018,430-160
16 Sept 2026, 09:578,590-106
12 Sept 2026, 11:588,696-76
8 Sept 2026, 06:028,772-89
3 Sept 2026, 07:498,861-45
31 Aug 2026, 07:428,906-126
28 Aug 2026, 03:259,032-28
24 Aug 2026, 20:149,060-51
21 Aug 2026, 01:259,111first reading

Engagement

229 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.31%
avg views ÷ 7,858 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.3
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 229 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held229 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,801
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,800
Videos
≈29
Links
≈135

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
41s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤535.7%
🔥214.3%
😱214.3%
🤷‍♀214.3%
👍17.14%
👏17.14%
🙉17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 229 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 74 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC4 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

The Fed's probability of a January rate hike after a potential December hike is rising, while +50 bps odds on December futures reached 13%. Combined odds of +50 bps in December and +25 bps reached 6.7%, while similar odds formed in October but stood at 0% before today's CPI.

11 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC4 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

The US gasoline average national retail price saw today the largest one-day drop in 18 years (Even bigger than COVID lol 🤗)

10 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC18 viewsread 11 November 2026

Past 24 hours - 353.31 Million Dollars liquidated in crypto

10 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC18 viewsread 11 November 2026

Core CPI (MoM) Actual: 0.3% Forecast: 0.2% Previous: 0.3% CPI (MoM) Actual: 0.4% Forecast: 0.3% Previous: 0.6% Overall: Short-term Bearish for crypto and risky assets.

10 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC15 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🟠 Trump Media $DJT has bought an additional 1,510 Bitcoin in Q3 and now holds a total of 15,649 BTC

9 Nov 2026, 15:54 UTC24 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Happy Monday, everyone. $1.3 TRILLION added to US stocks in the past 30 minutes.

9 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC23 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

NEW: 🇺🇸 US wholesale sales surge 2.8% MoM in October, far exceeding 1.1% forecast and accelerating from 1.8% prior

Showing the 12 most recent of 229 posts we hold for @cryptostuffs001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SMASH CRYPTO1
@Jpcrypto111 · 19,734
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 18 September 2026
$BERSERK Channel ($SOL Airdrop)
@sol_airdrop_berserk · 31,905
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto News 🌍 | Global Updates 🗞️🗞️ 📰” (@cryptostuffs001), 7,858 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptostuffs001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.