We believe in technical analysis and fundamental analysis. We always try to give best analysis based on charts and upcoming events. Always do your own research. Educational stuff only.
#crypto #PUMP #Kucoin #Binance #Signal #pumps #Btc
Support: @TCG4YOU
Created
Between 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 25 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @TCGFORYOU — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
1 more channel is in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net -2,623. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74,390–77,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 02:01
74,783
-250
18 Sept 2026, 23:17
75,033
-139
16 Sept 2026, 11:37
75,172
-93
14 Sept 2026, 15:59
75,265
-101
12 Sept 2026, 23:15
75,366
-87
10 Sept 2026, 22:36
75,453
-154
7 Sept 2026, 21:57
75,607
-186
4 Sept 2026, 20:36
75,793
-72
3 Sept 2026, 06:35
75,865
-64
2 Sept 2026, 00:57
75,929
-62
1 Sept 2026, 00:57
75,991
-69
31 Aug 2026, 00:57
76,060
-63
30 Aug 2026, 00:19
76,123
-54
28 Aug 2026, 22:34
76,177
-59
28 Aug 2026, 00:53
76,236
-31
26 Aug 2026, 21:26
76,267
-49
25 Aug 2026, 21:56
76,316
-47
24 Aug 2026, 20:54
76,363
-76
23 Aug 2026, 05:13
76,439
-85
21 Aug 2026, 13:52
76,524
first reading
Engagement
194 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 74,783 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
115
of 194 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
194 (1 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,223,410
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 02:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,450
Videos
≈5
Links
≈373
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
The altcoin market took the vote harder than Bitcoin. Measured from the last close before the vote, the median top-100 coin fell about two points more than Bitcoin. The share of the field above its 20-day average dropped from 56% to 19% in one session.
The longer trend bent without breaking. Most of the top 100 still trade above their 50-day average, and almost none sit at a 30-day low. At the May 2026 top the 50-da…
#TOTAL UPDATE:
#TOTAL shot up as expected; alts moved really well, with a jump from 40% to 200% in the overall market. Price is also rejecting from major resistance now around $2.9T - $2.97T. Minor or short-term retracement can come along with that, so prepare for it. Once the index starts breaking the $2.90T mark, then we can expect it to move further higher in the price of altcoins.
#BITCOIN DAILY TF UPDATE:
#BITCOIN crosses over the major area and now returns back inside it. Price can easily go to support at $82,500, and a bullish move from there is expected, along with a new higher high.
Stablecoins are the cash that funds the next leg, and the pool is not growing. Stablecoin Market Cap sits near $301B, flat on the week and about 4% below its April 2026 peak. Its 30-day growth rate is just under the 1.5% to 2.9% band marked on the chart. When growth sat inside that band, Bitcoin's next month was its strongest on average; the fastest growth spells were followed by losses.
Growth has recovered from th…
#BANK dropped as we predicted and moved around 30% in profits. Now it is back again near the major resistance part. If the H4 candle closes above $0.0351, then early longs can be anticipated until the next area of major resistance at $0.0425.
#BTC was able to sustain over the support area, and now the price is again attempting to break down through the zone. A close below will lead to a short-term down move to the $82,000 area.
#NEAR had a great break and retest of the consolidation range and moved around 128% in profits. If you get into the longs, then it's time for securing profits; secure major partials here and move stops near the last swing low.
#ARPA/USDT
https://www.binance.com/en/trade/ARPA_USDT
Breakout and retest ✅ on daily timeframe now time for continuation towards $0.017🚀
Short-term targets: 10%-30%-50%-70%-100%
#BTC is almost there for the $90,000, but instead formed a double top and dropped to the drawn support area. Now, the price is holding over the zone and could potentially be a good point for the next leg up.
#SEI Analysis:
#SEI attempting to move above the #Resistance area with bullish momentum building 📈🟢💪. Daily candle close still pending — patience is key before committing to any position 🔴.
Price Confirmed close above resistance, So, a long opportunity opens targeting next #Resistance at $0.0791–$0.08277 — enter with a small stop-loss and manage risk carefully as the trade develops ⚡️🎯👀
#BTC.D is still going sideways, but this pump strongly drove an up-move which tightened the altcoin, while #Bitcoin drives the market up. Now, if #BTC remains stable and the Index dumps, we can expect a much stronger rally in the overall market.
Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @TCGFORYOU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto VIP Signal @CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,390 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Trading Coach @tradingcoach · 70,242 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Altcoin & Bitcoin Trading @altcoinsignals · 53,936 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Tiger's™ @Crypto_Tigers1 · 26,156 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
The Crypto Express @thecryptoexpress · 258,705 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Profit Coach™ @cryptoprofitcoach · 28,396 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
The Analyst CRYPTO @TheAnalystCrypto · 71,010 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Dr. Crypto | Free Signals 👨🏻⚕️ @drcrypto_trading · 30,188 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Analytics Insight @analyticsinsightmag · 34,642 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
CRYPTO CLASSICS @CryptoClassics · 120,395 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™ @CryptoRROFFICAIL · 179,783 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official® @wallstreetqueenofficial · 202,753 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒 @PAIDROSE · 141,377 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Rose Premium Signals 🌹 @RosePremiumm · 145,445 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Wall Street Crypto Trading @Wallstreetcryptotrader · 99,412 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Wolf of Trading® @wolfoftrading · 127,711 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Coin Signals @Coin_Signals · 73,139 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
The Bull @thebull_crypto · 174,931 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
CoinCodeCap Classic @coincodecap · 25,395 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
𝐂𝐑𝐘𝐏𝐓𝐎 𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐌𝐄 @CryptoNavigationPrime · 52,183 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 16 September 2026
Crypto News @news_crypto · 100,019 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Whales Crypto Trading Coach™ @whalestradingcoach · 33,398 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
CRYPTO TREYSI @cryptotreysi · 33,978 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 153 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading Crypto Guide ™” (@TCGFORYOU), 74,783 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TCGFORYOU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.