Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Learn 2 Trade®

Channel

Learn 2 Trade®

@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,838subscribers

+790 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781634100
TypeChannel
Username@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global
DescriptionHigh potential signals .. Most accurate BTC analysis.. Verified ✅ Results https://t.me/Learn2tradeCrypto_Global LET'S MOVE TOWARDS FINANCIAL FREEDOM
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Learn2tradeCrypto_Global

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global/79344 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC@JacobCryptoBury_Live/384827 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global/79351 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC@JacobCryptoBury_Live/384897 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global/79352 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC@JacobCryptoBury_Live/384907 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global/79353 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC@JacobCryptoBury_Live/384917 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global/79374 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC@JacobCryptoBury_Live/385127 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global/79384 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC@JacobCryptoBury_Live/385227 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@JacobCryptoBury_Live6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–0)
@Rocketwalletsignals_pro6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Rocketwalletsignals_pro (4–2)
@cryptosignals_org00016 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@cryptosignals_org0001 (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 10 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @Learn2tradeCrypto_Global — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

26,04831,31628,6827 August 2026 — 26,048 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,048 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,194 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,681 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,628 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,619 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,316 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,092 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,465 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,450 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,375 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,069 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,932 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,920 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,913 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,885 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,869 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,763 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,753 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,746 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,738 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,725 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,714 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,636 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,477 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,430 subscribers4 September 2026 — 29,412 subscribers7 September 2026 — 29,346 subscribers10 September 2026 — 29,094 subscribers12 September 2026 — 28,922 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,612 subscribers15 September 2026 — 27,998 subscribers17 September 2026 — 26,838 subscribers26,8387 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +790. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,258–32,106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:5826,838-1,160
15 Sept 2026, 18:1727,998-614
14 Sept 2026, 04:5728,612-310
12 Sept 2026, 11:5828,922-172
10 Sept 2026, 08:3929,094-252
7 Sept 2026, 04:3829,346-66
4 Sept 2026, 09:4029,412-18
2 Sept 2026, 18:4829,430-47
1 Sept 2026, 16:5729,477-159
31 Aug 2026, 18:4729,636-78
30 Aug 2026, 20:4629,714-11
29 Aug 2026, 23:4429,725-13
28 Aug 2026, 21:4429,738-8
27 Aug 2026, 23:0829,746-7
27 Aug 2026, 01:0829,753-10
25 Aug 2026, 23:4429,763-106
24 Aug 2026, 21:3629,869-16
23 Aug 2026, 05:4529,885-28
21 Aug 2026, 20:3629,913-7
20 Aug 2026, 14:4329,920first reading

Engagement

716 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.194%
avg views ÷ 26,838 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.1
208 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
208
of 716 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held716 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total10,831
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈54,300
Videos
≈741
Links
≈7,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC6 viewsread 26 September 2026
Video

Your decision determines your success Trust the process money will come The joy of winning supersedes the pain of losing so don't give up You can't be unlucky everyday so stay focused and be at peace knowing one day you will smile and everyone will congratulate you on your winnings too.💯

26 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC12 viewsread 26 September 2026

🏆 WOW What a blessing to hear that my work has impacted LIFE for the better, really GOD bless you brother and thanks for the kind words. 🔥 And this is a typical story I see with many of my members, once they start taking action the motivation is unlimited. Upwards momentum is a real thing.💯

26 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC11 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

What is my current activity? 🤔 1) You are contacting me. ✉️ 2) You are enrolling in our VIP/VVIP program. ⭐️ 3) Our team of professionals will provide you with a trade, including profit targets and stop-loss levels. 📊 4) You will generate income and manage your financial obligations. 💰 I await your participation. ⏳

26 Sept 2026, 10:11 UTC10 viewsread 26 September 2026

🚀 MEMBER'S FEEDBACK 🔥 What more can I say? PROFITS 🤩 This week has been so good for us, and my team are confident that by following my recommendations regularly, you will continue to achieve stable and positive results ⚡️ Have you been watching, and maybe telling yourself "I'll join on the next cycle" Don't be the person who watches other peoples success and wishes they had joined. Are you ready to start and pro…

Showing the 12 most recent of 716 posts we hold for @Learn2tradeCrypto_Global. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Learn 2 Trade®” (@Learn2tradeCrypto_Global), 26,838 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Learn2tradeCrypto_Global.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.