#AR USDT

Channel
CRYPTO GEEK
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,034subscribers
-115 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001269166014 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptO0_g_e_e_k |
| Description | ADVERTISING 👉 @CRYPTOGEEKADMIN I am not a financial advisor Do Your research Everything is for educational purposes Here I share my opinion and thoughts nothing is financial |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptO0_g_e_e_k |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 27,034 | -18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 27,052 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 27,071 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 27,085 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 27,104 | -22 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 27,126 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 27,136 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 27,145 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 27,149 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 27,149 | first reading |
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.58%
- avg views ÷ 27,034 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,240
- 56 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 56
- of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (4 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 69,291 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈12,900
- Videos
- ≈26
- Links
- ≈1,990
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
#BTC USDT
AVAX
#C98 USDT Make entry once we get a breakout above 0.01481 If you want to trade with me join me on blofin now No kyc : Sign-up on Blofin now
#BTC USDT
IOTX USDT Again updating You all Keep your eyes on it i am expecting a upward move on it..
#BTC USDT It's a weekend so i am expecting a minor growth before closing.
#IOTX/USDT looks like it’s gearing up for one more leg higher. Keep a close eye on it and watch the 0.002825 zone carefully. A confirmed breakout above this level could open the door for a strong move upward and potentially significant growth. Stay alert for confirmation before entering.
Bull rally about to start. So don't miss your chance. If you want to copy my trades and Trade with me live then do join Blofin from my referral link. Benefits of joining: ➡️No Kyc 1: Monthly giveaway. 2: Free Special copy trade signal. 3: High priority support from my end. https://partner.blofin.com/d/CRYPTOGEEKTRADE
#ID USDT
#BTC USDT
#LUNA2USDT Keep your eyes on it
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @cryptO0_g_e_e_k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arscryptocalls7 · 133,714
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 105,687
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 136,336
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@binance_360 · 101,919
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
@KingCryptoCalls · 320,993
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@PAIDROSE · 146,174
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@BCUSAReal · 142,384
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@vip_signal · 171,121
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
@Whalesguide · 201,758
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 185,661
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@Free_Binance_Crypto_Future · 130,550
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
@wolfoftrading · 132,895
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@whalescryptovip · 213,223
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@thecryptoexpress · 269,289
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@RosePremiumm · 149,111
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 200,260
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 341,235
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@binancekillers · 311,855
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 327,032
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@gorilla_crypto · 177,454
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@BitcoinBullets · 105,634
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@FedRussianInsiders · 126,506
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO GEEK” (@cryptO0_g_e_e_k), 27,034 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptO0_g_e_e_k.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.