Channel
@MJCryptoPublic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001282254083 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MJCryptoPublic |
| Description | Fundamentals, Technical Analysis and Key Market News Backed by the man who called the 2017/2018 crypto bubble pop and 2021 alts spring pop! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MJCryptoPublic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 31 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Vitalik Buterin makes proposal EIP-4488 to lower gas fees for Ethereum Layer-2 in the short term This week Vitalik Buterin and Ethereum developer Ansgar Dietrichs released a new Ethereum improvement proposal called EIP-4488, which aims to lower gas fees for Ethereum Layer-2 scaling solutions.- link
Photo, posted without a caption
Covid variant news isn't ideal. Yet to see any sizable amount of liqs or OI flush, so a wick lower is very possible. However, STH cost basis, or what I've been calling the "on-chain bull market support band", sits at $53K. Let's see if it holds over these next few daily closes.
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/south-african-scientists-detect-virus-variant-amid-spike-81397494?cid=social_twitter_abcn This is what causing panic in btc and markets all over world. Less information more speculation.
Photo, posted without a caption
#BTC DOMINANCE ANALYSIS It is currently at the demand zone and rejecting from EMA 21 resistance while EMA 55 is giving it a support. RSI in the normal zone, MACD crossover is showing bearish sign. I am expecting some sideways movement in that zone. We’ve to wait for it to sustain breakout/breakdown before confirming next move.
#BTC (Update) In 2-days timeframe, Bitcoin Bulls have Failed to Clear the Major Resistance Area (64k) & lost the 60k Support As Well. So far not Looking good & Bitcoin might Retest the 50-51k Support area 📉 In Bullish Case, If 64k resistance got Cleared, Expecting bullish Wave towards the 78k 🏄♂️
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Btc break down the channel support and rejecting from EMA 21 resistance where MACD is showing bearish strength. So we might see a further drop to $59K before the big move up. Hidden bullish divergence is also there and if it plays out then this is the sign of end of correction and Btc will pump from the current zone.
The #BTC Fib Multipliers model gives a projected cycle peak price of $267K-$409K. We focus on the 5.618 & 8.618 Fib lines, which are at $233K & $357K today respectively. BTC looks right on time to repeat its parabolic run in past cycles, rhyming more with the 2013 bull phase.
📉 Daily Ethereum chart review 📈 Ethereum received strong support on 59300 and bounced with volume. Bearish momentum is decreasing so next we may expect a stage of consolidation that will be followed by bullish bounce. Neutral scenario target 65000-66000 reached ✅ Regardless of sequence of moves expect to see ETH at ~61000-62000 in any case. The only difference is if it will drop there now or after another impulse …
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 When I wrote about 20-30% dumps within nearest weeks I didn't expect it to happen on the next day. Although it was the most logical continuation after the ATH breakout. So far retracement was only by 10%. If BTC lose 4H MAVW there will be another impulse move down to 56.5-57.5 zone at least. If that will be one of those big shake out dumps then real targets should be around 52k and 48…
#BTC (Update) In Shorter TF, Rising Wedge Broken Downside & Retesting in Process..!!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MJCryptoPublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MJ Crypto™ General” (@MJCryptoPublic), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MJCryptoPublic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.