Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Signals Crypto Insights Profits

Channel

Signals Crypto Insights Profits

@CryptoPumpTranding

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,941subscribers

-5,264 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001778449436
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoPumpTranding
DescriptionPromotion: @Artikaio
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoPumpTranding

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 93 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CryptoProUpdates/3442721 Oct 2026, 20:26 UTC@CryptoPumpTranding/13203 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 20:27 UTC1.0072 seconds
@CryptoProUpdates/3451927 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC@CryptoPumpTranding/13209 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoProUpdates/3459131 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC@CryptoPumpTranding/13215 · this entry31 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoProUpdates/3460431 Oct 2026, 20:25 UTC@CryptoPumpTranding/13217 · this entry31 Oct 2026, 20:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@Crypto_News_Bitcoin_Ethereum/2337831 Oct 2026, 20:26 UTC@CryptoPumpTranding/13217 · this entry31 Oct 2026, 20:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@Crypto_News_Bitcoin_Ethereum/233851 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC@CryptoPumpTranding/13218 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@CryptoProUpdates21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@CryptoProUpdates (21–0)
@Crypto_News_Bitcoin_Ethereum15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Crypto_News_Bitcoin_Ethereum (11–4)
@Ethereum_Merge13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Ethereum_Merge (12–1)
@BanksCryptoCalls6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0018 minutes@BanksCryptoCalls (5–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 32 of the 32 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 52 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 93 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @tirangaa_vip. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 93 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Coingraph | News
@CoingraphNews · Channel
719,901 subscribers
Crypto Inner Circle®
@Cryptoinnercycles · Channel
401,543 subscribers
AI Watch 🏴
@headlines · Channel
335,540 subscribers
Fat Pig Signals
@Fat_Pigs_Signals · Channel
319,127 subscribers
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · Channel
313,746 subscribers
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · Channel
246,899 subscribers
Bitcoin
@bitcoin · Channel
181,088 subscribers
Coin Bureau
@CoinBureau · Channel
114,494 subscribers
CRYPTO CLASSICS
@CryptoClassics · Channel
110,321 subscribers
Ian Crypto Trades (est. 2015)
@Iancryptotrade1x · Channel
107,971 subscribers
JACOB CRYPTO BURY ®
@JacobCryptoClanDiscord · Channel
87,535 subscribers
XM Crypto News 🔥📈🚨💰
@Xmcryptonews · Channel
78,820 subscribers
Trading Crypto Guide ™
@TCGFORYOU · Channel
74,221 subscribers
Trading Coach
@tradingcoach · Channel
68,857 subscribers
Bitunix Trading Signals
@Bitunix_Trades · Channel
67,111 subscribers
CRYPTO NEWS
@cryptocurrency_media · Channel
63,672 subscribers
Bartosz Goat Trading
@WDawson_Trades · Channel
62,802 subscribers
SatoshiSlice
@orangesats3 · Channel
57,999 subscribers
Chain Insights
@chainscoop · Channel
56,612 subscribers
CryptoWorldNews
@CryptoWorldNews · Channel
40,905 subscribers
Crypto Pro Updates
@CryptoProUpdates · Channel
34,183 subscribers
Crypto+
@sport4_2_3_1 · Channel
31,553 subscribers
Crypto Analytic Z
@CryptoAnalyticZ · Channel
31,209 subscribers
DMFirst Premium
@win82Club · Channel
30,598 subscribers
Crypto Master | Futures Signals
@binancemaster_trader · Channel
30,527 subscribers
DROP SIGNALS
@drop_signals · Channel
29,092 subscribers
Whale Alerts
@Whale_Alerts_io · Channel
28,176 subscribers
Evening Trader Signals
@EveningTraderSignals · Channel
19,568 subscribers
Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold
@Signals2day · Channel
18,059 subscribers
CRYPTO - MAGAZINE
@cryptomagazine · Channel
17,386 subscribers
Did You Know
@Didyoureallyknow · Channel
16,051 subscribers
Ethereum Merge
@Ethereum_Merge · Channel
15,877 subscribers
Binance Futures/Bybit/OKX/Kucoin/Bitget Signals & Spot
@cryptoheistsignall · Channel
15,186 subscribers
Bitcoin Magazine
@Bitcoin_Magazine · Channel
14,331 subscribers
MODZYY !!
@tirangaa_vip · Channel
13,590 subscribers
GAMEFI Launches
@GameFiLaunches · Channel
13,467 subscribers
Bitcoin ™️ | BTC | News
@bitcoinnews · Channel
12,369 subscribers
Mudrex Crypto Insights
@mudrexinsights · Channel
11,477 subscribers
Kucoin Big Pump
@KucoinBigpump · Channel
11,416 subscribers
FP Markets
@fpmarketsroom · Channel
11,393 subscribers
Crypto Bitcoin News TG
@CryptoBitcoinNewsTG · Channel
11,339 subscribers
Anna Calls
@AnnaCalls · Channel
11,282 subscribers
HKCM
@HKCMhopf · Channel
11,271 subscribers
🔹Crypto Trading Reports🔹
@Crypto_Trading_Reports · Channel
10,321 subscribers
KAORI🍉channel
@Kaori_watermelon · Channel
8,492 subscribers
Crypto News 🌍 | Global Updates 🗞️🗞️ 📰
@cryptostuffs001 · Channel
7,858 subscribers
CryptoPulse Global Signals
@Superfutures01 · Channel
7,791 subscribers
AAPKA INVESTMENTS
@aapka_investments · Channel
7,683 subscribers
Crypto News Bitcoin Ethereum Tron Solana Pump.Fun
@Crypto_News_Bitcoin_Ethereum · Channel
7,598 subscribers
Ethereum ™️ | ETH | News
@ethereumnews · Channel
6,840 subscribers

42 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

6,39812,2059,301.57 August 2026 — 12,205 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,164 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,007 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,948 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,756 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,681 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,641 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,479 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,268 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,055 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,960 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,843 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,740 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,669 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,408 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,160 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,043 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,974 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,498 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,226 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,687 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,036 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,055 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,398 subscribers30 September 2026 — 7,868 subscribers7 October 2026 — 7,465 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,231 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,850 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,841 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,906 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,907 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,916 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,807 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,742 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,904 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,941 subscribers6,9417 August 202610 November 2026
37 measurements spanning 95 days, net -5,264. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,527–13,076 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 22:106,941+37
7 Nov 2026, 08:216,904+162
4 Nov 2026, 06:396,742-65
31 Oct 2026, 20:296,807-109
29 Oct 2026, 00:316,916+9
25 Oct 2026, 15:106,907+1
22 Oct 2026, 14:196,906+65
19 Oct 2026, 12:276,841-9
16 Oct 2026, 11:466,850-381
13 Oct 2026, 10:377,231-234
7 Oct 2026, 09:217,465-403
30 Sept 2026, 08:017,868+1,470
19 Sept 2026, 17:376,398-657
15 Sept 2026, 08:567,055-981
11 Sept 2026, 18:168,036-651
7 Sept 2026, 04:408,687-539
2 Sept 2026, 10:339,226-272
30 Aug 2026, 00:169,498-476
27 Aug 2026, 10:349,974-69
26 Aug 2026, 10:5810,043first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.98%
avg views ÷ 6,941 subscribers
Avg views / post
693
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
43.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held80 (3 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total33,245
Reactions total11,640
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 15:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,920
Videos
≈373
Links
≈878

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,642 reactions across 39 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,95133.9%
👍3,91933.7%
🔥1,52513.1%
👏1,1339.73%
😁8157.00%
👎2992.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,642 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC55 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 $5 TRILLION JPMORGAN JUST ANNOUNCED THEY BOUGHT $47,000,000 WORTH OF #BITCOIN THEY NOW OWN OVER $539,000,000 WORTH OF BTC JAMIE DIMON BENT THE KNEE 🔥 #Bitcoin #BTC #JPMorgan #CryptoNews #Institutional #Bullish #WallStreet #Crypto @CryptoPumpTranding

❤4👍3👎2👏1

12 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTC208 views41 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

OUCH! $AVAX fell 27.6% in 28 days and slipped below $8. That’s a bigger drop than both BTC and ETH over the same stretch. 1.67 MILLION AVAX unlocked on November 8, about $14 MILLION worth. AVAT still holds 13.31 MILLION AVAX on its books. The autumn gains are gone! #AVAX #Avalanche #CryptoNews #Altcoins #Bearish #TokenUnlock #Crypto @CryptoPumpTranding

👎16👍12❤8😁5

12 Nov 2026, 03:54 UTC305 views63 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

THE BLOCK: Solana Company reported $3.4 million in Q3 revenue, showing strong growth from $0.7 million in the same period last year. Its quarterly revenue was primarily driven by staking revenue on its $SOL holdings. As of Sept. 30, the company held roughly 2.4 million SOL, with a fair value of approximately $288.2 million. #Solana #SOL #CryptoNews #Staking #CryptoEarnings #Blockchain #Bullish @CryptoPumpTranding

🔥25❤20👍12👏6

11 Nov 2026, 20:38 UTC497 views140 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇻🇪 President Donald Trump says US is taking billions of dollars worth of oil from Venezuela, expects hundreds of billions soon. #Oil #Venezuela #Trump #BreakingNews #Geopolitics #Energy #CrudeOil @CryptoPumpTranding

❤56👍42🔥28👏14

11 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC630 views236 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Sui official reminder: Suiet wallet support will cease after November 14, urging users to back up mnemonic phrases promptly.

👍79❤62👏47😁32🔥16

11 Nov 2026, 09:21 UTC814 views299 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Jack Dorsey says $BTC keeps trending higher over time because it’s math. Even after it crashes, the long-term pattern remains consistent. “Every 4 years it does the same thing and it just consistently goes up fairly predictably” #Bitcoin #BTC #JackDorsey #CryptoNews #HODL #BitcoinCycles #Crypto @CryptoPumpTranding

❤100👍80👏59🔥40👎20

11 Nov 2026, 06:42 UTC813 views321 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

THE BLOCK: US Spot bitcoin ETFs shed $95 million on Tuesday, driven by $78.2 million in net outflows from BlackRock's IBIT. This marks the fourth consecutive net outflow day for the funds. Spot ether ETFs reported $1.32 million in net outflows for the day. #BitcoinETF #EthereumETF #CryptoNews #BTC #ETH #InstitutionalFlows #BlackRock @CryptoPumpTranding

🔥129❤96👍64👏32

11 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC763 views308 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🚨 JUST IN: Goldman Sachs Forecasts Two Fed Rate Hikes 🇺🇸 Goldman Sachs expects the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates by 25 basis points (0.25%) twice: once in December and again in March 2027. #GoldmanSachs #FederalReserve #Fed #InterestRates #USMarkets #Economy 📢 @CryptoPumpTranding

❤123👍92👏62🔥31

10 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC825 views347 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

CLOSE THE STOCK MARKET #Crypto #STOCK #Liquidation #CPI #Inflation #CryptoMarket @CryptoPumpTranding

❤116👍93😁69🔥46👎23

10 Nov 2026, 21:15 UTC731 views260 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🚨 US Inflation Shock Hits Crypto Markets! $200 million was liquidated in just 5 minutes following the unexpected US inflation data. #Crypto #Bitcoin #Liquidation #CPI #Inflation #CryptoMarket @CryptoPumpTranding

❤86👍68🔥53👏35👎18

10 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC848 views330 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🛢️ After 70 days, oil has returned to the $91 level! #Oil #CrudeOil #BrentOil #Trading #MarketUpdate @CryptoPumpTranding

❤132👍99🔥66👏33

10 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC764 views243 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🔴 CPI Came in Higher Than Expected! Risk assets, including gold and cryptocurrencies, are now experiencing a sell-off due to growing concerns about potential interest rate hikes. @CryptoPumpTranding #CPI #Inflation #Gold #Bitcoin #Crypto #InterestRates

❤97👍73🔥49👏24

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @CryptoPumpTranding. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ChatGPT Tips, Prompts & AI Tools
@GPT_ChatGPT_AI_Tools · 59,275
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
AI Tools & Prompts
@Best_AI_tools · 166,814
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
Hi, AI • Tech News
@hiaimediaen · 571,181
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
Artificial Intelligence
@Artificial_intelligence_in · 65,749
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
Krypto | Finanzen | Politik
@kryptodeutsch · 62,256
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Signals Crypto Insights Profits” (@CryptoPumpTranding), 6,941 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoPumpTranding.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.