Channel
@arx_spn
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,033,612subscribers
+2,084 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001583313036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arx_spn |
| Created | 11 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arx_spn |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @dva_majors/9175922 Apr 2026, 10:27 UTC | @arx_spn/29265 · this entry22 Apr 2026, 10:45 UTC | 1.00 | 17 minutes |
| @dva_majors/926628 May 2026, 16:38 UTC | @arx_spn/29508 · this entry9 May 2026, 08:56 UTC | 1.00 | 16 hours |
| @dva_majors/924214 May 2026, 10:01 UTC | @arx_spn/29620 · this entry17 May 2026, 06:00 UTC | 1.00 | 13 days |
| @arx_spn/29782 · this entry30 May 2026, 17:00 UTC | @dva_majors/9378130 May 2026, 17:15 UTC | 1.00 | 16 minutes |
| @dva_majors/938761 Jun 2026, 10:31 UTC | @arx_spn/29806 · this entry1 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC | 1.00 | 4.2 hours |
| @dva_majors/9379731 May 2026, 07:29 UTC | @arx_spn/29810 · this entry2 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC | 1.00 | 47 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @dva_majors | 49 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.7 hours | @dva_majors (26–23) |
| @arxspn | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.7 hours | @arxspn (15–0) |
| @rybar | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 56 minutes | this entry (8–6) |
| @rvvoenkor | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 6.3 hours | this entry (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 45 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,017 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 1,033,612 | -2,008 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 1,035,620 | -1,042 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 1,036,662 | -1,410 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 1,038,072 | -854 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 1,038,926 | +3,452 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 1,035,474 | +3,742 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 1,031,732 | +204 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 1,031,528 | first reading |
1,148 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 251 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,148 (5 April 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,336,450 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 45 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 23of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 4.0 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 24.4% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 62.0% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 54,700 views — 5.27% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 90,570).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /3060610 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC | 13 minutes – 3 minutes old | 2,700 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /3060110 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC | 120 minutes – 20 minutes old | 7,980 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /3060010 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC | 43 minutes – 2.0 hours old | 21,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 12,939 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 41 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3059910 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC | 816 minutes – 4.0 hours old | 59,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 20,632 interp. → 3.0 hours: 55,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 69 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3059810 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC | 96 minutes – 4.4 hours old | 61,100 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 31,264 interp. → 3.0 hours: 56,100still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 59 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3059510 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC | 119 minutes – 6.1 hours old | 144,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 46,641 interp. → 3.0 hours: 78,400 → 6.0 hours: 144,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3059410 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC | 148 minutes – 8.0 hours old | 69,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 13,600 → 3.0 hours: 56,900 → 6.0 hours: 65,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 79 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3059310 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC | 1528 minutes – 9.0 hours old | 66,900 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 43,000 → 3.0 hours: 54,100 → 6.0 hours: 61,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 28 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arx_spn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 April 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😎Что за пикник у обочины? Слаженная работа разведывательного и ударного расчёта позволила быстро обнаружить пехоту врага и незамедлительно ударить по ней. 🤙Архангел Спецназа! ❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
✈️Небесных братьев поздравляем с Днём ВВС! Ваш ратный труд — это надёжный щит, охраняющий мирное небо над нашей страной. Крепкого вам здоровья, успехов в службе и мирного неба над головой. Лёгкого взлета и мягкой посадки. От винта! 🤙Архангел Спецназа! ❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
😎Танк был, и вот его не стало. Провели рейд по тыловым районам врага и нашли танк. Такую жирную цель упускать нельзя: первым дроном обездвижили машину, а вторым ударили в уязвимое место. 🤙Архангел Спецназа! ❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
💬«Шары» вместо «Хорнетов»💬 Интересный эпизод войны зафиксирован на трассе до Мелитополя в Запорожской области. На участке дороги до Новоалексеевки FPV на «Старлинке» сбрасывались с малоразмерных шаров. Ранее подобное украинская сторона делала с «Хорнетами», которые сбрасывали с аэростатов и увеличивали дальность их применения на десятки, а-то и сотню километров. Однако в последнее время «Хорнетов» стало намного ме…
😎Вас обнаружили Купленные с вашей помощью, дорогие подписчики, дроны позволяют контролировать всё большую площадь, а значит, и быстрее находить врага. А как только мы находим врага, выжить ему уже сложно. 🤙Архангел Спецназа! ❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
💬Уменьшение географии ударов БпЛА💬 ✍️ Прошедшие сутки стали уникальными в контексте украинских атак на российские территории, поскольку ВСУ отошли от ударов по куче регионов и сконцентрировались лишь на прифронтовых зонах. И самый мощный удар пришелся по Новороссийску. Этой ночью была самая массированная атака дронов ВСУ на регион. В результате атаки поврежден 21 дом, включая четыре предприятия, одно из которых Нов…
✍️А какой толк от этой «Зебры?» У данного дрона картинка 1080р-2К, а за пультом сидит живой оператор который доводит его до цели в случае непоняток с машинным зрением. Единственный способ борьбы против этого - развитие расчётов FPV-ПВО на местах. Только таким образом это будет уничтожаться. Как проскочить? - по погоде, не позволяющей противнику поднять борт в воздух, других вариантов не наблюдаем. Необходимо пони…
👼Доброго утра, дорогие подписчики! К Тебе́, Влады́ко Человеколю́бче, от сна воста́в прибега́ю, и на дела́ Твоя́ подвиза́юся милосе́рдием Твои́м, и молю́ся Тебе́: помози́ ми на вся́кое вре́мя, во вся́кой ве́щи, и изба́ви мя от вся́кия мирски́я злы́я ве́щи и диа́вольскаго поспеше́ния, и спаси́ мя, и введи́ в Ца́рство Твое́ ве́чное. Ты бо еси́ мой Сотвори́тель и вся́кому бла́гу Промы́сленник и Пода́тель, о Тебе́ же все…
Вы не знаете, есть ли видео, где зеленский выходил к толпе, как наш Президент? Насколько мы помним, он стоял за бронестеклом и вообще старается не показывать нос. Нашему Верховному нужна наша поддержка как никогда! УСН СБП ФСО — вы выглядите бомбово, как и положено спецназу! 🤙Архангел Спецназа! ❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
💬Драпатый, шо ты там?💬 Противник из состава 121-й бригады ВСУ публично обратился к Драпатому с жалобами на то, что они уйдут с позиций из-за того, что они пьют собственную мочу, и у них большие проблемы с ротацией. Стоит отметить, что на отдельных направлениях у украинских подразделений действительно могут возникать сложности с ротацией и доставкой продовольствия. Как утверждается, снабжение осуществляется с помощ…
😎 Разлетелась мерзость Пилоты 2 МСБ 136 ОМСБр продолжают нести дежурство в небе и поражать тяжёлые дроны врага. Сколько уже "вампиров" сожжено не счесть. Но каждый уничтоженный дрон - это спасенные жизни наших парней. 🤙Архангел Спецназа! ❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
😎 Уйти не выйдет Пилоты 2 МСБ 136 ОМСБр не оставляют ни малейшего шанса вражеским курьерам на "Вампирах". 🤙Архангел Спецназа! ❗️🤙Если не грузит видео - смотрите у нас в MAX
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,148 posts we hold for @arx_spn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@arx_spn edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 769 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 107 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
17 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА” (@arx_spn), 1,033,612 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arx_spn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.