Channel
@NabrezhnyeIntel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,883subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001666040029 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NabrezhnyeIntel |
| Created | 6 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NabrezhnyeIntel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 2,883 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 2,885 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 2,891 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 2,895 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 2,902 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 2,909 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 2,915 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 2,922 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 2,927 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 2,927 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
517 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 178 | 34.4% | |
| 👍 | 130 | 25.1% | |
| ⚡ | 60 | 11.6% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 6.00% | |
| 🙏 | 26 | 5.03% | |
| 🤩 | 26 | 5.03% | |
| 😎 | 24 | 4.64% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 3.87% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 2.32% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.387% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.387% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.193% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2025 to 28 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Destruction of a T-72EA tank (incorrectly identified as a T-80) of the Armed Forces of Ukraine by FPV drone crews of the "Somali" separate assault battalion "Somali" between Krasnoarmeysk and Dimitrov. The graveyard of Ukrainian armored vehicles on the key supply artery of the Armed Forces of Ukraine continues to expand. Loss card and reference: https://lostarmour.info/armour/62574
❤14👍5
📌#Kostyantynovka ⚠️ The Russian Armed Forces began assault operations against the city of Kostyantynovka. 🔻 With the capture of half of Predtechnye, the RF Armed Forces continue on this front along the T0504 road, however, with strong pushback. 🔻 Nearby the settlement of Oleksandro-Shutlynoye, the RF Armed Forces managed to take control of this settlement and thereby, enter the first streets of Kostyantynovka. ✅ …
👍15👎1🙏1
📌 The RF Armed Forces entered the regional city of Kostyantinovka in Donetsk Oblast. Report soon.
❤21🙏5👍2
The Ukrainians have started whining a lot about the situation in Kupyansk. They even claim that our forces supposedly already control most of the city. For now, this is an obvious exaggeration, but we'll see. We can talk about MOST of the city only when we cross the railway in the western part of the city along its entire length and secure our position.
👍20❤1🙏1
📌#Lyman ⚠️ The RF Armed Forces are less then 7km away from Lyman. 🔻 They entered into the settlements of Shandryholovye, Derylovoye, Seredjne, and Karpovka. Fighting continues here, with some of these settlements being under at-least 75% Russian control. 🔻 To the west, the settlements of Zarochnoye and Torskoye seem to be confidently under Russian control. And there are some major advances continuing in the Serebr…
❤22🔥3👍2😘1
📌#ChasovYar ⚠️ The city of Chasov Yar came under Russian control. 🔻 After nearly 16 months of consistent fighting through this challenging city, the RF Armed Forces managed to capture Chasov Yar. The town was relatively well defended. 🔻 The town was defended by nearly 6 brigades. The slow yet steady grind forward from Russian 'Ivanovo' paratroopers after the capture of Artemovsk, and now Chasov Yar, demonstrates a…
⚡22🤩10🫡9❤2😎2
📌 The remaining part of Chasov Yar came under Russian control. Report soon.
😎20⚡7🤩4👏3❤1
📌#Lugansk ⚠️ More then 99.5% of Lugansk Oblast is in Russian control. Only an area of 22.9km2 remains. 🔻 The final settlement of Lugansk Oblast under Ukrainian control, Gregovka, fell under Russian control some weeks ago. Since then, incremental Russian advances see the RF Armed Forces edge closer to the remaining Ukrainian part of Lugansk. 🔻 For now, the complete capture of Lugansk Oblast only serves a symbolic m…
🔥12❤6👍5⚡1👏1🤩1
📌#Kupyansk ⚠️ The situation in Kupyansk continues to evolve; and a-lot of speculation has begun about the situation in the city. 🔻 Most of the critical fighting takes place near the outskirts of Kupyansk, Moskovka, and Palamarovka. On the outskirts of Kupyansk, the RF Armed Forces managed to (finally) secure Golubovka and enter Kupyansk. 🔻 Near Moskovka, Russian forward elements managed to enter the settlement, wh…
👍14❤7⚡3👏1🤩1
📌 This weeks reports are to be published soon. We apologise for the inactivity.
👍23🎉2🤣2👏1😁1
📌 #Kharkov ⚠️ The RF Armed Forces are making tactical offensives along the Kharkov - Vovchansk frontline. 🔻 The RF Armed Forces made significant advances from the border area, and are advancing in the direction of the Vovchansk highway. This is the primary MSR for the Ukrainian garrison in Vovchansk. 🔻 Although the situation in Vovchansk remains somewhat stagnant - in an offensive scenario, the RF Armed Forces wou…
❤19👏4⚡2🙏2🤩1
📌 The city of Chasovoy Yar is 96% under the control of the Russian Armed Forces.
🔥16👏4🤩3🙏2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NabrezhnyeIntel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NabrezhnyeIntel” (@NabrezhnyeIntel), 2,883 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NabrezhnyeIntel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.