Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crisis Report by PrepperNow!

@crisisreport

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

366subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001639338572
TypeChannel
Username@crisisreport
Descriptionwww.YouTube.com/@crisisreport
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/crisisreport

Growth

3667 Aug 2026, 12:31 — 366 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:31 — 366 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:318 Aug 2026, 06:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 365–367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:31366no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:31366first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 366 subscribers
Avg views / post
57.1
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20237 August 2026)
Views total400
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,780
Videos
2,190
Links
2,610

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 32s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1750.0%
1544.1%
🤩12.94%
🤯12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2023 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC33 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfeVideo

Popular conspiracy theorist and rare and mystical book collector Joe Feltz has died of unknown causes. He was specifically not suicidal. (2 min 13 sec) Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑

Signed Prepper Now

7 Aug 2026, 02:06 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfeVideo

Warning ⚠️ Graphic. Ukrainian man is attacked by a killer drone. He survived with injuries. (41 seconds) This is the future and this why you need a gun and knowledge and experience of how to use it. Drones will have to be shot down when they target you. This isn’t pretty and we have to be aware this is possible and is happening.

Signed Prepper Now

6 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC42 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @iceagefarmer

AgTech companies can't help but intimate that they are disrupting and supplanting our connection to God. This has been bothering me for years as I cover the space, and now I think the pattern is abundantly clear: the technocrats invoke sacred language as they roll out their patented organisms, bioreactors, and lab-grown protein. Judge for yourself: Eden: - Eden Brew: milk without the cow — precision fermentation

3👍1

Signed Prepper Now

2 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @CIG_telegramVideo

🏚 🇺🇸 👨‍🚒 The damage just keeps going. Nothing but leveled homes as far as the eye can see right now in the Indian Trail neighborhood. It’s hard to put into words the amount of destruction that we’re seeing right now. This is on N Westgate & Tiffany. 📎 Natalie Grant

🤯1

Signed Prepper Now

1 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC83 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @CIG_telegramVideo

🇲🇦🇪🇸 It took a couple of days of third worlders having open access to a Spanish city for it to end up looking like a dump. 🔗 Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT)

Signed Prepper Now

6 Aug 2023, 17:06 UTC≈12,400 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @geopolitics_primePhoto

Elon Musk pledged that his social media platform, X (formerly known as Twitter), will pay legal bills of those people who were "unfairly treated" at workplaces by their employers for posts and likes on the platform He added that there would be "no limit" to funding the bills and called on people to inform the platform of such cases. In late October 2022, Musk finalized the $44 billion acquisition of Twitter, a US c

👍96

6 Aug 2023, 16:56 UTC≈5,970 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @geopolitics_primePhoto

🇺🇸 Trump to withdraw US from NATO if reelected, stated warhawk Bolton during an interview to a conservative US media outlet on Thursday. Besides, in his op-ed, Bolton opined that “despite increasing defense spending in his first term, Trump could freeze or slash military budgets next time,” cautioning that the ex-POTUS may prefer to focus on “civilian infrastructure projects” instead. 👉 Follow this link for more de

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crisisreport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crisis Report by PrepperNow!” (@crisisreport), 366 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crisisreport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.