9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,503–46,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:28
46,508
-31
11 Aug 2026, 15:42
46,539
+1
10 Aug 2026, 12:22
46,538
+17
9 Aug 2026, 11:51
46,521
-10
8 Aug 2026, 11:35
46,531
+14
7 Aug 2026, 10:58
46,517
-14
6 Aug 2026, 13:26
46,531
+5
6 Aug 2026, 10:00
46,526
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:59
46,526
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 46,508 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
50 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
516,670
Reactions total
8,662
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,000
Videos
≈2,470
Links
≈5,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 21s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,662 reactions across 50 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,860
33.0%
❤
1,975
22.8%
🔥
1,515
17.5%
💔
670
7.73%
🫡
425
4.91%
💯
411
4.74%
👏
311
3.59%
👌
223
2.57%
🕊
136
1.57%
🙏
81
0.935%
😎
55
0.635%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,662reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
50,000 North Korean Troops to Russia? What Changed in the Ukraine War?
* Subtitled
Ukraine says North Korea could deploy between 30,000 and 50,000 troops inside Russia.
What changed since the previous estimate, and what roles could these forces perform?
We separate confirmed facts from unverified intelligence assessments and examine the reported North Korean missile unit in Russia.
video link:https://youtu.be/iJ…
Russia strikes Odesa with around 17 missiles and 90 drones, according to preliminary estimates.
Why have ships and ports become a major front in the war?
We examine the battle for the Black Sea and Sea of Azov—and why Türkiye is intervening.
video link:https://youtu.be/7cER539GLeQ?si=FX4TzgxUm8aA64QR
D. At the end of July, the Israelis completed their demolition operations in Tallouseh.
E. Following the signing of the trilateral agreement in late June, the first pilot zones under the new agreement began to be implemented, with the IDF’s withdrawal from Nabatieh Al-Fawqa and Zawtar El Gharbiyeh (as well as from Froun and Srifa), where the LAF deployed in early July and began clearance and demining operations.
F. I…
Situation south of Lebanon [3/8/2026]:
The trilateral Israel-Lebanon-U.S. agreement allows Israel to continue the war in southern Lebanon. 🇮🇱 🇱🇧
During the month of July and the first few days of August, the Israeli ground campaign in Lebanon has continued with less intensity on the ground, but with the same difficulties in implementing the so-called pilot zones and a definitive peace agreement—which Hezbollah contin…
Es necesario que en España 🇪🇸 se persiga a este tipo de personajes que solo buscan desacreditar al país del que se benefician mientras que al mismo tiempo son financiados por su país de origen (Marruecos 🇲🇦). Concretamente a esta persona deberían de aplicársele cargos por blanqueamiento del terrorismo (al ser simpatizante de los "demócratas" sirios).
Y si no fuéramos un país con una sociedad moralmente enferma, cada …
The situation continued to escalate after Kurdish protesters in Kobani stormed STG institutions in the city and burned the green Syrian flag. After the deployment of security forces from the Ministry of the Interior (MOI), order was restored, and seven people suspected of instigating the clashes and burning the flag were arrested; one of them was a member of the STG, which appears to suggest an attempt to pin the bla…
The persecution of Syrian Kurds continues. 🇸🇾
Just two weeks after the tribal escalation south and east of Hasakah on August 10, the city of Ras al-Ayn—de facto occupied by the SNA—witnessed a new episode of discrimination against the Kurds. Far from the propaganda about the SDF’s titanic efforts to ensure the return of the Kurdish population expelled by Turkey and its proxies in 2019, several Kurdish civilians were …
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Suriyak_maps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 65,074 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Intel Slava @intelslava · 395,638 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Middle East Spectator — MES @middle_east_spectator · 385,979 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates @geopolitics_prime · 295,285 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
247th Guards Air Assault Regiment(en.wikipedia.org) “…|url=https://t.me/rybar_in_english/5371 |access-date=2025-11-20 |website=Telegram}}{{Cite web |title=Suriyakmaps |url=https://t.me/Suriyak_maps/721…” read 9 August 2026
Battle of Krasnohorivka(en.wikipedia.org) “…|archive-date=24 May 2024}}/t.me/DeepStateUA/19544 -->/t.me/NgP_raZVedka/17855 -->/t.me/Suriyak_maps/2940 -->{{cn|date=May…” read 9 August 2026
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Suriyakmaps” (@Suriyak_maps), 46,508 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Suriyak_maps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
