코스닥 살리기 나서는 정부…13일 거래소서 대책 논의 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/648/0000052522?sid=101
❤3

Channel
@selfstudyview
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,956subscribers
+61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002153495494 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @selfstudyview |
| Description | ”좋은 기회를 발굴하고 함께 스터디“ 📈돈이 될만한 강한뉴스와 관련주 공유 📈주도섹터안에서 대장주 흐름추적 📈꾸준한 종목정리와 스터디기록 시장의 흐름,관심종목, 일정, 그리고 돈이 되는 핵심뉴스까지. 기회가 될 재료만 선별해서 올립니다. 문의 @self_stock 공유된 정보에는 다소 부정확하거나 오류가 있을 수 있으며, 이를 바탕으로 한 투자 결정은 전적으로 투자자 본인의 판단과 책임에 따라 이루어져야 함을 안내드립니다. |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/selfstudyview |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 19:00 | 7,956 | -9 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:30 | 7,965 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:36 | 7,976 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:10 | 7,979 | +9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 7,970 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 7,973 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:01 | 7,978 | +4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 7,974 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 7,972 | -7 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 7,979 | +20 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 7,959 | +23 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 7,936 | +26 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 7,910 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 7,909 | +25 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 7,884 | +25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:55 | 7,859 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 7,876 | -18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 7,894 | -23 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 7,917 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 7,922 | first reading |
151 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 151 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 110,348 |
| Reactions total | 882 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,037 reactions across 149 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 855 | 42.0% | |
| 👍 | 617 | 30.3% | |
| ✍ | 280 | 13.7% | |
| 🫡 | 143 | 7.02% | |
| custom 5264710717470158023 | 74 | 3.63% | |
| 🙏 | 68 | 3.34% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,037 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 77 posts held from the last 30 days (10.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
코스닥 살리기 나서는 정부…13일 거래소서 대책 논의 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/648/0000052522?sid=101
❤3
📈 오늘의 시장요약 (11/11 수) (https://t.me/selfstudyview) ▶️ [반도체 관련주] 코어위브 호실적 및 AI 성장 둔화 우려 완화 요약: AI 클라우드 기업 코어위브가 3분기 예상을 웃도는 실적을 발표하고 올해 실적 전망도 상향 조정하면서 AI 성장 둔화 우려가 완화되었습니다. 이에 SK하이닉스·삼성전자뿐만 아니라 소부장 및 기판 관련주를 중심으로 강세가 나타났습니다. 관련주: 코리아써키트, 이수페타시스, 티엘비, 심텍, 주성엔지니어링, 피에스케이, 테크윙, 디아이, 두산테스나, 에프에스티, 원익IPS, 네오셈, 테스 등 ▶️ [보안 관련주] 금융보안원 해킹 사고 및 보안 체계 우려 확대 요약: 금융보안원에서 해킹으로 개인 정보가 유출되는 사고가 발생함에 따라 금융 보안 체계 전반에 대한 우려가 커지며 보안 …
👍6❤1
오늘 코스피시장은 장중 연기금이 마중물느낌으로 매수세를 이끌며 지수 하단을 지지하는 모습을 보였고, 오후장부터는 외국인이 순매수로 전환하며 수급 개선에 힘을 보태어 상승마감으로 끝낸하루.
❤4custom 52647107174701580233✍1
연기금 추종
👍9✍4🫡2custom 52647107174701580231
코스피는 연기금 주도로 변동성을 만들어내고 있는중. 연기금 매수세를 따라 기관과 외국인도 같이 매수로 그 순간만큼은 따라가는 모습 포착
✍4❤4custom 52647107174701580231
코스닥 시가총액 상위쪽으로 수급이 들어오고있는모습
✍5custom 52647107174701580231
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52647107174701580231
코스피 외국인/기관 매도세 코스닥은 이와 반대로 매수세.
✍5
어제 오늘 신규상장종목들도 상장하자마자 바로 하락하는 등. 시장의 헷지성격을 갖추고있지 못한 모습 이어지는중.
✍4👍3
시장은 오전에 혼조세를 보이고 있는 상황. 코스닥이 코스피보다 상승률이 더 높은 상황이고 항공주/데이터센터/보안/탈모등 개별테마쪽에서 뻐르게 돌아가면서 순환매가 나오고 있는 시장의 모습을 띄고 있는 상황.
👍4❤1
독학주식 장전 브리핑 (11/11 수) (https://t.me/selfstudyview) "CPI 쇼크 & 12월 50bp 인상 우려에 금리 폭등… 엔비디아 리스크 속 낙폭 축소" (다우 -0.30%, 나스닥 -0.74%, S&P500 -0.38%, 필라델피아 반도체 -0.35%, 러셀2000 -0.68%) ✅ 3줄 핵심 요점 CPI 예상 상회 & 연준 위원들의 50bp 인상 언급: 10월 CPI가 예상을 상회한 데 이어 월러 연준 이사와 로건 총재가 12월 50bp 금리 인상 가능성 및 추가 긴축의 필요성을 경고하며 2년물 국채금리가 20bp 이상 급등했습니다. 엔비디아 대중국 반도체 수출 논란 확산: 젠슨 황 CEO 관련 정보유출 의혹 및 미 의회의 대중국 반도체 수출통제 강화 움직임으로 엔비디아(-5.47%)가 급락했고 반도체…
❤5✍2👍2
📈 오늘의 시장요약 (11/10 화) (https://t.me/selfstudyview) ▶️ [항공주] 트럼프의 이란 추가 공격 자제 시사 및 국제유가 급락 요약: 트럼프 대통령이 이란 추가 공격 자제를 시사하며 국제유가가 급락함에 따라, 유류비 부담 완화 기대로 항공주 중심으로 매수세가 유입되었습니다. 관련주: 아시아나IDT, 대한항공, 아시아나항공, 진에어, 에어부산, 한진칼 등 ▶️ [데이터센터 관련주] 아시아 지역 투자 확대 기대 및 NHN 호실적 요약: 미국 중간선거 민주당 승리로 현지 데이터센터 건설이 위축된 반면 상대적으로 규제 부담이 적은 아시아 지역으로의 투자 확대 기대가 지속되었으며, NHN의 호실적 발표가 상한가를 견인했습니다. 관련주: NHN, 혜인, 엘리스, 삼성에스디에스, 지엔씨에너지, SGC에너지, 래블업 등 …
❤10👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @selfstudyview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“독학주식📚 (실전투자/인사이트공유🇰🇷🇺🇸)” (@selfstudyview), 7,956 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selfstudyview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.