Channel
@deva_divna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,105subscribers
-58 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001695732472 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deva_divna |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deva_divna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 27,105 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 27,112 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 27,125 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 27,127 | -22 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 27,149 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 27,155 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 27,167 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 27,162 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 27,162 | -1 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 27,163 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 477,430 |
| Reactions total | 63,079 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48,588 reactions across 46 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 19,222 | 39.6% | |
| 💯 | 11,158 | 23.0% | |
| 🤣 | 3,620 | 7.45% | |
| 👍 | 3,447 | 7.09% | |
| 🤮 | 2,406 | 4.95% | |
| 😡 | 2,096 | 4.31% | |
| custom 5319166131074785089 | 1,972 | 4.06% | |
| 🙈 | 1,459 | 3.00% | |
| ❤ | 721 | 1.48% | |
| 🤯 | 620 | 1.28% | |
| 🔥 | 278 | 0.572% | |
| 😱 | 276 | 0.568% | |
| 🤔 | 238 | 0.49% | |
| 😁 | 188 | 0.387% | |
| custom 5463199066231937162 | 175 | 0.36% | |
| 😢 | 166 | 0.342% | |
| 🙏 | 120 | 0.247% | |
| 👏 | 67 | 0.138% | |
| 💊 | 57 | 0.117% | |
| 🥰 | 53 | 0.109% | |
| 22 further kinds | 249 | 0.512% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63,079reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deva_divna. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сразу 230 нелегалов приплыли на одной лодке в Великобританию и это стало новым национальным рекордом в истории страны. Африканские мигранты прибывают на маленьких лодках по популярному маршруту с севера Франции через Ла-Манш на юго-восток Британии. При этом добрые французские люди снабдили их даже спасательными жилетами, лишь бы они побыстрее уехали.
🤣458🤬142🙈40👍25custom 546319906623193716217😁9🤮7👏4
Мой новый рекомендасьён по ассортименту книжной лавки «Листва» и издательству «Черная сотня». Записки террориста (в хорошем смысле слова) – это мемуары ополченца с позывным «Африка», который застал самое начало войны на Донбассе. Хотя я бы даже сказала, что это не мемуары, а дневник, с плотной событийностью, написанный простым слогом и с живой интонацией. В книге всё как мы любим. Начинается с Африки: государств…
❤175🔥82👍63🤔9🤮8👎1🤣1😁1
Директором Волочковой некоторое время была работница из Таджикистана Лола. Лола начинала у неё с позиции клининга по дому. Вместе с мужем и будучи беременной, они работали с проживанием, муж садовник-плотник, Лола на уборке. Очень быстро Лола переросла в присматривающую за постоянной в похмелье балериной, готовила поесть, может и подливала. Затем стала её визажистом и стилистом, это те образы, где Волочкову как-будт…
🤣648🙈185🤮136💯30custom 546319906623193716216custom 531916613107478508913😁12❤6
Насосия Волочкова в перерывах между просекко, Мальдивами и рассказами как Сулейманчик ей Большой театр подарил, вступилась за таджикскую семью. Суть в чем: бройлерину вместе с директором не пустили на рейс «Аэрофлот» на Мальдивы, рядом возмущался таджик, которого тоже не пустили на рейс вместе с выводком из четырех детей. Азиат по классике действовал в стиле: кто первый одел халат, тот и врач – начал орать на сотру…
🤣434custom 5319166131074785089241🤮227🙈31🙉12❤7custom 54631990662319371627🍌5
Комменты тоже зачетные. Религия – это сложно, инструкция по подмыванию и платочек – это легко. Так и запишем.
custom 5319166131074785089483💯213🤣141🙈21custom 546319906623193716210🤮8😁8💊3
Что показательно, Русской православной церкви в Казахстане)) Девушка живет в РК. И это без всякой грамотной пропаганды и агитации со стороны РПЦ. А что бы было, если бы пропаганда русского мира здорового человека мало мальски велась.
👍679💯289🥰52🙏19❤15🤔11🔥8🗿7
Михаила Матвеева пытаются снять с выборов в Госдуму. Партия пенсионеров (не Единая Россия, другие пенсы) подала иск против Матвеева, из-за шрифта и фоточек на официальном сайте депутата Матвеева. Звучит и выглядит как сюр, но завтра судебное заседание.
🤬1,450🤯150🙈59🙏20😁9💯6👍5😈4
Ребята, традиционно прошу поддержать меня и деятельность канала❤️ Чтобы наш маленький «Центр исследования Средней Азии и Кавказа» и братской республики Беларусь рос, и мы углублялись и в национально-политические темы, которые не менее важны для нашего очень сильно аполитичного общества. И чтобы ваш смелый админ продолжал наше маленькое/большое дело, а канал и дальше рос и прирастал новыми хештегами и расследованиям…
❤265🙏79🔥47🤝16👍10🖕5🤮1custom 53191661310747850891
Это Дагестан. Таких арабских надписей из Корана, и не только, вдоль дорог очень много. Готовый кавказский эмират, куда смотрит власть.
🤬877🤮162💯80🤷♂19🙈15custom 531916613107478508912😁5👍4
Тезис №3 Идеологическая ловушка подкрепляется институциональной миной. Статья 5 Конституции РФ закрепляет разный статус для субъектов: республики имеют право на свои конституции и государственные языки, а края и области — только уставы. Это называется асимметричным федерализмом. Эта асимметрия создает правовую основу для восприятия республик как «государств» с особыми правами. Внешние аналитики уже используют этот…
💯776👍57❤25🔥14🤣4💊3🤔2🤝2
Тезис №2 По данным последней переписи населения 2021 года, количество русских в России составляет 80%. Это процент именно тех, кто четко обозначил свою национальную принадлежность к русскому народу, и не включает другие славянские народы, которые условно можно считать если не русскими, то близкородственными русским. Тем не менее, русским упорно отказывают в обозначении России, как русского национального государства,…
💯867👍143🔥41❤16😱6💊4🤣3🤝1
«По поводу Железнодорожного и Балашихи - это территория правового вакуума. Я по работе часто сталкиваюсь с тамошними ментами и приставами и это всегда приводит в ступор от того, что менты там не хотят работать вообще, а приставы просто врут и прячутся от людей. Участковый там вообще конь ох#евший. Прямо говорит, что делать ничего не будет. Вся эта шайка-лейка на протяжении года не выполняла решение суда по детям и п…
🤬889😡81🤮34🙈23custom 53191661310747850898💯7🤯4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @deva_divna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 42,782 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дева Дивная” (@deva_divna), 27,105 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deva_divna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.