Channel
@texstratdevelopment
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,103subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001229951931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @texstratdevelopment |
| Created | 27 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/texstratdevelopment |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:10 | 3,103 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 3,104 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 3,105 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 3,105 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,811 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
66 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 15.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 12.1% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 9.09% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 4.55% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 4.55% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ой ладно. А до ЕГЭ, можно подумать было по-другому. И "совсем не было проблем". В 1990ых и в конце 1980ых ученики выпускных классов готовили только предметы, которые им надо было для поступления в вуз, причем по программе отличной от школы, индивидуальной в каждом вузе.. По остальным предметам оценки просто проставлялись из требования минимального прилежания. "Марь Иванна, Маша идет в медицинский, готовит биологию, …
👍5
Ну, Вольфыча, вообще говоря, за это 35 лет назад высмеивали.
Кардинал ел омлет С госпожой де Миннет Он поел на экю И пошел в туалет. Лилон-лила Лилон-лила Лилон-лила-лилеееее
👍1
Красивая, но почти бессмысленная история с включением электровоза и тепловоза Коломенского завода в Реестр Минпромторга. Альтернативы этим машинам в любом случае нет. Единственный покупатель - РЖД, у неё своя система сертификации. Под требования 1520 никакая машина зарубежного производства фактически не пройдет. Других областей применения в народном хозяйстве у этой техники тоже не существует. Техника пассажирская, м…
👍5
Пришло время поспорить с тезисами ув. Evening Prophet Кузнецов пишет: Сейчас начинается турбулентная эпоха ломки сетки профессий и социальных систем. Потому гадать, как будет называться комфортная ячейка в экономике и обществе будущего невозможно. А вот какое нужно образование - тут все понятно: STEM + soft skills, предпринимательские и проектные навыки и понимание устройства мира и общества (с последним в последнее…
👍4🤔1
Тут в канале пошли домыслы по этому посту, дескать, "чтоб народ на забывал пустые полки". Так вот пост мой был совсем не про то, что там была в чем-то вина советской системы, а в том,, каков был масштаб беды советской системы, когда надо было постоянно быть в догоняющем развитии. И все время чего-то не хватало. И эта проблема догоняющего развития - никуда не делась.
👍1
Старше Эдды перепечатывающие Андрея Медведева и Медведев перепечатывающий Юрчака делают ошибочные выводы о том, что "СССР мог технически воспроизвести любой Западный товар". И приводят пример джинсов, которые цеховики шили из итальянской ткани и получалось "не хуже". Так вот, продолжая тему Чадаева про возможность "бутикового" производства на конце цепочки. Джинсы из правильной ткани вам сошьет даже портниха-надомн…
👍5🔥3❤1
Тут на днях у Кричевского был плач про сложность трудоустройства молодых без опыта "даже по связям" и не считать же, дескать, работой, работу "за 50 тысяч в месяц", очень перекликающийся с постом Димитриева, про Осетию, где женщины, не обремененные статусными требованиями имеют более низкий порог для первоначального найма / стартапа, в результате быстрее делают карьеру. По факту выпускник любого, даже самого хорошег…
👍9❤1👎1🥴1
🛌 «Шуйские ситцы» привлекают студентов к созданию принтов постельного белья под брендом YERRNA Выживает то, что развивается. Так же как это верно в отношении традиций, верно оно и по отношению к их хранителям. Смелый и гибкий, деловой и азартный характер способен развиваться комплексно: не отрываясь от основ соответствовать духу времени. 🔵 Продолжить чтение на Digital Textile
🔥5❤1
Подготовлен обзор "Тренды российской экономики", июнь 2026 г.
29 июля вместе с проректором по науке и инновациям Университета Косыгина Юрием Боровиным посетили Государственный университет управления, где провели рабочую встречу с ректором Владимиром Строевым и проректором Марией Карелиной. Обсудили перспективные направления взаимодействия между нашими вузами: создание межвузовского консорциума для решения комплексных задач технологического лидерства России, совместное участие …
❤3
Оказывается, в советских техникумах в начале 1980ых изучали "основы маркетинга".
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @texstratdevelopment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 735,613 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доктор отраслевых наук” (@texstratdevelopment), 3,103 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/texstratdevelopment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.