Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Хаотически зла

@chaoticallyevel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,528subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001797149972
TypeChannel
Username@chaoticallyevel
Created17 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chaoticallyevel

Growth

1,5281,5331,530.56 August 2026 — 1,533 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,533 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,532 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,530 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,528 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,527–1,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:521,528-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:531,530-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:081,532-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:361,533no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:571,533first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.5%
avg views ÷ 1,528 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (15 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total22,691
Reactions total406
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

406 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁25061.6%
11428.1%
👎297.14%
🗿133.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC537 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Оказывается, существует специальная серия американских паспортов, выпущенная к 250-летию независимости США. И выглядит она так. Деды эти не перестают удивлять.

😁14👎31

31 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,090 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А вы тоже завариваете чай, а потом думаете «не, ну кофе тоже хочется», делаете кофе и пьете из двух чашек по очереди или это только я такая угашенная?

😁281

30 Jul 2026, 22:07 UTC≈1,110 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thecringetimes

дуров — пособник террористов, автор музыки из «Драйва» — мертв, тот музыкант из 30 секунд до марса и "господин никто" — насильник, дайвинчик, где постят хуевые мемы — помогает устраивать подрывы и убийства в РФ это тотальная война против счастливых воспоминаний о летних деньках в первой половине десятых, когда ты чиллил на диване, листал паблики в вк и все еще было нормально

23😁6

30 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,190 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Боротьба триває.

😁29👎2🗿1

30 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC974 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати, если что, украинский народ стоит с картонками за Федорова пятнадцатый день. Узнать об этом становится все сложнее, потому что ботоферма перестала продвигать контент на эту тему.

😁174

29 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC974 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Любопытство взяло верх и я таки посмотрела «Одиссею». Понравилось. Кто в оригинале смотрел, там, правда, Одиссей говорит «заканчивается бронзовый век» или это переводчики начудили? Но вообще меня впечатлил мощный антивоенный посыл фильма, о котором все писали. Одиссей, полный раскаяния, произносит пламенную речь о том, что он совершил в Трое, птрсный призрак убитой девушки протягивает ему руку, прощает и исчезает, ми

9

27 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC906 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А и правда, подзабыли. А это ж такой кек, грешно не вспомнить и не улыбнуться. Накарябали западу вишлист, типо никакого расширения НАТО, их послали в пешее путешествие по известному направлению, огорченные, напали на Украину и в результате получили +2 свеженькие страны в НАТО рядышком.

😁255🗿1

26 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 7 August 2026

«Обсессия»: бюджет 750 к, сборы 448 лямов. «Одиссея»: бюджет 250 лямов, сборы 346 лямов. Клево, да?

24 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,570 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почитала, что политические украинцы думают по поводу высказываний Драпатого. Если свести всё к двум словам, то получается: «А в чому він не правий?» Лично я в этом ничего удивительного не вижу. Когда-то Корчинский сказал фразу: «Крым будет украинский или безлюдный». Думаю, что сегодня эту формулу уже можно расширить: «Украина будет или украинской, или безлюдной». И, судя по всему, именно к этому мы и движемся. Украин

41🗿4👎2😁2

22 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,470 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как это никто? А Дугин? А Прилепин? Симонян, между прочим, тоже писательница. Никто. Сразу вот это оскорблять.

😁352

22 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,530 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Заметила, что россиян больше всего волнует не то, почему склады WB горят, а то, почему горят только склады WB, а Озона - нет. Удивительные, конечно, люди.

😁43🗿1

20 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,590 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Две причины, по которым я не буду смотреть «Одиссею» Нолана. Причина раз: недавно я уже смотрела «Возвращение Одиссея». Две «Одиссеи» за такой короткий срок - это слишком много и ровно на одну больше, чем надо. Причина два: что это такое? Это зачем оно такое? Это со съемок Бэтмена реквизит остался? Не хочу на это смотреть.

😁153

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chaoticallyevel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 904,752 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хаотически зла” (@chaoticallyevel), 1,528 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaoticallyevel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.