Channel
@zola_of_renovation
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
34,550subscribers
-198 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001437814721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zola_of_renovation |
| Created | 18 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zola_of_renovation |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 23% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 19:48 | 34,550 | -14 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:15 | 34,564 | +4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:48 | 34,560 | -17 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:11 | 34,577 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:17 | 34,578 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:26 | 34,579 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:56 | 34,580 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:28 | 34,581 | +19 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 34,562 | +24 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:54 | 34,538 | +5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 34,533 | -10 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:35 | 34,543 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 34,558 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:51 | 34,563 | -13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 34,576 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 34,584 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 34,582 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 34,581 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:26 | 34,591 | -17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 34,608 | first reading |
1,074 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,074 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,362,160 |
| Reactions total | 48,933 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 18:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
133,591 reactions across 996 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 54,495 | 40.8% | |
| 👍 | 35,259 | 26.4% | |
| 🙏 | 18,199 | 13.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10,329 | 7.73% | |
| 🦄 | 5,977 | 4.47% | |
| 👎 | 5,253 | 3.93% | |
| 💅 | 4,079 | 3.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 996 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133,591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zola_of_renovation. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 58 of 432 posts held from the last 30 days (13.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Бонба сетецентричный пункт поразить не может, т.к. в этом и смысл сетецентричности — в понимании, что штабная работа делается ХУЕВО, штабнюки опергруппы собрать не могут, поэтому мы щас на джамбе со смежниками сетецентрично заставим работать хоть что-нибудь.
😁31👍2
Signed Влад У
Братское сердце, ну наверное этого бы не было, если при ПУР армии было развернуто ISTAR подразделение, которое бы централизованно сводила бы всю осведомленность со всех источников и передавала бы это огневикам, те бы приоритеты резали и был бы сплошной кайф в полосе армии. Но нет, разумеется такое хуй сделаешь, поэтому надо сетецентрично общаться со смежниками, налаживать взаимодействие, ебаться с хуй пойми кем обоз…
❤🔥31🦄3
Signed Влад У
Я очень редко открываю сборы. И только тогда, когда действительно понимаю, что без вашей помощи не обойтись. Не люблю просить. Не люблю обращаться к людям с протянутой рукой. Считаю, что прежде чем просить о поддержке, нужно сначала самой сделать всё возможное. Но сейчас именно такая ситуация, что тянуть больше некуда. На Дружковском направлении нашим парням, эвакуационным группам и штурмовикам, очень нужны дроны и…
❤🔥26👍5😁2🙏2
Signed Влад У
Хватит бомбить Китайгород, давайте лучше вместе ебнем по Скуфинштейна
👍41😁9👎7🦄7
Signed Влад У
А че власти новых территорий не могут обеспечить бесперебойное электроснабжение для наших войск? Парни боевые задачи без света выполнять вынуждены.
😁60👎16🦄12💅5👍1
Signed Влад У
Ну и кто поспорит, что Киев — самый прекрасный город на земле? Как его можно не бомбить любить?
😁73👍23🦄2👎1
Signed Влад У
Баллада о книжных детях откровенно заебала (У Horus новый альбом, неплохой)
🦄20👎7👍5❤🔥4💅1
Signed Влад У
Я всегда знал, что пиндосы очень тупые. Главное мое разочарование — что американские евреи оказались тупее украинских и российских евреев.
😁103💅1
Signed Влад У
Хуже гугугаги только верящие в Василиска Рококо, верить, что умный парсер станет чёрным властелином и пробатит человечество — совсем уж сок мозга.
👍36😁5💅2
Signed Влад У
Порекомендовал одной женщине сегодня в качестве подарка для ее друга-экстремиста книжку Юкио Мисимы «Золотой храм» В целом, во мне умер хороший продавец книг.
😁50❤🔥10🦄3👎1
Signed Влад У
Кровавым пожаром зарделся пипи Израиль сегодня лишишься Биби Он был русским в первую очередь, настолько русским, что не любил бородатую залупу Гельича именно так, как не любят его русские. F
😁80👎8❤🔥7
Signed Влад У
В целом, если за хороший бабулет, то можно и на стороне США против дракон-куколда выступить, не так ли?
👍40👎39😁14🦄5
Signed Влад У
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,074 posts we hold for @zola_of_renovation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@zola_of_renovation edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @zola_of_renovation as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что интереснее обсуждать
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что важнее
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
СВО надо
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кого вам больше жалко?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Цитаты из Бригады:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 56 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 71 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 68 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zola_of_renovation named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Угольный #РусскаяШколаВКиевеОтомщена” (@zola_of_renovation), 34,550 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zola_of_renovation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.