International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “#ВСмысле?” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
33 measurements spanning 53 days, net +632. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,875–62,700 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 22:00
62,605
+206
17 Sept 2026, 17:37
62,399
-15
15 Sept 2026, 13:20
62,414
-5
14 Sept 2026, 01:37
62,419
-19
12 Sept 2026, 08:01
62,438
-6
10 Sept 2026, 03:59
62,444
+33
6 Sept 2026, 18:15
62,411
+85
4 Sept 2026, 03:22
62,326
+31
2 Sept 2026, 20:46
62,295
+17
1 Sept 2026, 16:23
62,278
+25
31 Aug 2026, 14:13
62,253
-13
29 Aug 2026, 14:03
62,266
+8
28 Aug 2026, 17:26
62,258
-4
27 Aug 2026, 16:35
62,262
+13
26 Aug 2026, 19:13
62,249
+24
25 Aug 2026, 15:42
62,225
-16
24 Aug 2026, 18:57
62,241
-45
23 Aug 2026, 03:07
62,286
+4
21 Aug 2026, 13:28
62,282
-13
20 Aug 2026, 11:14
62,295
first reading
Engagement
117 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 62,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,600
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 117 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
117 (31 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
583,970
Reactions total
10,740
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 03:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,390
Videos
≈2,700
Links
≈4,770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 36m
Average length
9m 41s
Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,793 reactions across 105 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
8,871
34.4%
👍
5,984
23.2%
custom 5222235857439704342
3,044
11.8%
custom 5425057201137918413
1,678
6.51%
🤔
1,488
5.77%
❤🔥
1,422
5.51%
👏
954
3.70%
😈
771
2.99%
🤨
656
2.54%
😱
544
2.11%
😭
227
0.88%
custom 5269721741713745479
89
0.345%
🫡
65
0.252%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,489 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
104
across the posts below
Posts paid on
48
of 107 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AlanMamiati. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 117 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Правда стала опасной❗️
Особенно правда о войне — и вообще всё, что расходится с официальной линией.
Кому надо — всё давно понимают. Остальные молчат не потому, что согласны, а потому что не хотят получить статус «иноагента», уголовное дело или срок за «дискредитацию».
А когда народ массово молчит — это уже не согласие. Это значит, что люди перестали верить, что говорить вообще имеет смысл.
https://t.me/olegtsaro…
ЮЖНАЯ ОСЕТИЯ. «МИРНО». ПОКА.
Если посмотреть не на одно заявление, а на всю цепочку последних месяцев, картина получается очень простая.
В Грузии могут до хрипоты спорить власть и оппозиция, прозападные либералы и националисты, сторонники диалога с Москвой и её противники. Но в одном пункте у них удивительное единство:
независимую Южную Осетию Тбилиси не признаёт и конечной целью считает восстановление территориальн…
ИИ: КОГДА КОЛИЧЕСТВО ПЕРЕЙДЁТ В КАЧЕСТВО
Товарищи, в гонке искусственного интеллекта главный вопрос — в какой момент накопленные мощности позволят ему самостоятельно вести исследования и ускорять создание следующих поколений ИИ. Именно здесь возможен переход количества в качество, который изменит экономику и соотношение сил в мире.
Первый рубеж — надёжная самостоятельность. Человек ставит задачу, а система составля…
⚠️ «ЧЕМ БОЛЬШЕ ВЫ ХОТИТЕ СТАБИЛЬНОСТИ, ТЕМ ДАЛЬШЕ ВЫ ОТ СВОБОДЫ».
🤫 С Аланом Мамиевым получился разговор без удобных формулировок.
Обсудили:
✔️ Почему человеком, который боится, проще управлять
✔️ Как понять, где ваш путь сердца, а где навязанный сценарий
✔️ что меняется, когда вы всерьёз спрашиваете себя: кто я, где я и зачем?
🔥 ВЫПУСК УЖЕ НА КАНАЛЕ ⬇️
https://youtu.be/WPilwMTvdRU
Энергия для ИИ. Ресурсы для власти.
Товарищи, между 2016 и 2025 годами электрогенерация США выросла на 10,4%. При этом за 2017–2024 годы потребление американских дата-центров увеличилось примерно втрое — при росте общей выработки за тот же период всего на 8,2%. Вычислительная инфраструктура предъявляет энергетике совсем другой темп.
По оценке Epoch AI, производительность мирового парка ИИ-чипов с 2022 года росла пр…
📹Вышел подкаст с Аланом Мамиевым
Никакой доп инфы, просто смотрите, все выпуски с ним раз*ёб
https://youtu.be/s2mIwkORG9k?si=QXUfdrVvZJO2jbww
Не забудьте подписаться, поделиться с друзьями и оставить коммент✊🙏
Выборы закончились. «Единая Россия» сохраняет конституционное большинство в Госдуме. А теперь посмотрим, какая финансовая реальность складывается для обычного гражданина: что уже дорожает и какие новые платежи государство предлагает ввести.
Минфин предлагает распространить прогрессивный НДФЛ 13–22% на проценты по банковским вкладам, дивиденды, ценные бумаги, продажу имущества и другие пассивные доходы. Покупки в ино…
КТО ПИШЕТ ПРОГРАММУ СЛЕДУЮЩИХ 18 ЛЕТ?
Есть вещи, которые сначала кажутся эзотерикой, пока не начинаешь накладывать их на даты, географию и историю. И тогда рисунок становится слишком интересным, чтобы от него просто отмахнуться.
Сейчас вокруг Ирана идёт большая борьба. На поверхности всё привычно: нефть, Ормузский пролив, влияние, военные базы, торговые пути. Но согласно одной из эзотерических карт Земли, в районе …
🇺🇸 США создают «империю» дата-центров: разрыв с остальным миром стал неприличным
Посмотрите на эту инфографику. У США больше мощностей дата-центров, чем у следующих 14 стран вместе взятых. И это только начало.
📊 Сухие цифры:
• Текущая мощность США: 32 ГВт
• В планах (строится и проектируется): 70,6 ГВт
• Для сравнения: весь пайплайн США больше, чем текущие мощности всех остальных стран мира вместе взятых.
🤖 Почему…
ВАМ СЕЙЧАС БУДУТ ОЧЕНЬ МНОГО РАССКАЗЫВАТЬ, ЧЕГО НУЖНО БОЯТЬСЯ
Дорогие друзья, мобилизация, новые конфликты, ограничения, «страшная осень» — торговцев страхом вокруг становится всё больше.
👋 А я вам предлагаю другое: не отдавайте им своё будущее.
И именно поэтому значение имеет то, чего хотите лично вы, а не только то, чего вы боитесь.
В новом выпуске поговорили о том, что может ждать Россию до конца 2026 года, во…
МИР ДО 3 НОЯБРЯ?
Скоро в США выборы в Конгресс. И для Трампа сейчас это важнейший политический рубеж. Республиканцам необходимо сохранить контроль над Конгрессом, иначе вторая половина его президентского срока станет намного сложнее.
Поэтому Трампу срочно нужна победа. Любая. Желательно громкая и понятная американскому избирателю: «Я остановил войну. Я заставил их договориться. Америка снова решает».
Именно в этой …
🤔146👍42custom 542505720113791841315
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @AlanMamiati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@AlanMamiati edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПРОБУЖДЕНИЕ канал @probuzdenie17 · 27,855 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
Мистер Пилот @mister_pilot · 20,212 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 September 2026
ГИБРИДНАЯ ВОЙНА @hybridwarfare · 20,402 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 September 2026
Злой эколог @zloyecolog · 111,576 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Телеканал «Сталинград» @TELEKANALSTALINGRAD · 84,588 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Спец @spetstv · 21,608 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
ТЗС (Правозащитное Сообщество Торжества Здравого Смысла) @victoria_de_communi_sensu · 23,968 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Охотник на связи @ohotnik_na_sviazy · 74,656 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Хранители и Вершители @alphaingenium · 103,565 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Hyperborea @hyperboreaX · 58,265 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Будьте здоровы! А.Редько @budte_zdorovi_vse · 33,359 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
СВОБОДНОЕ ДЫХАНИЕ -- ☢ЯДрёна WatchЬ‼️ @shingarkin · 23,617 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Алан Мамиев ИНТЕНСИВ @intensiv_Mamiev · 30,525 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
Галина Царёва (официальный) @Galina_Tsareva_official · 67,693 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Даниил (Даниэль) Сачков, создатель Бастиона @danielsatchkov · 35,802 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Перехват управления @logikadysha · 37,181 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Дмитрий Перетолчин — «Картина Мира» @ndayclub · 23,459 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
АНТИУТОПИЯ @utopiyaproject · 30,827 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Владимир Лепехин | Канал @vladimirlepehin · 46,064 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Осознание и Пробуждение @osoznanie_i_probuzhdenie2026 · 42,387 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Сорадение - в жизнь! @soradenie · 19,847 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
Вадим Шегалов. PLANDEMIA.NEWS @voyager1970 · 45,032 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Агент свободы | тайный юрист @agent_svobodi · 34,803 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
Grimuare Магия Жизни @grimuare · 20,008 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
10 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алан Мамиев "ЗОВ Предков"” (@AlanMamiati), 62,605 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlanMamiati.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.