О войне, политике и информационной безопасности.
Обратная связь: @Info_Defense_bot
РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673b1e48340096358bade8d2®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
2 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -482. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 246,356–246,982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 04:55
246,428
-95
11 Aug 2026, 02:12
246,523
-55
10 Aug 2026, 03:40
246,578
-117
9 Aug 2026, 00:50
246,695
-72
7 Aug 2026, 23:02
246,767
-48
7 Aug 2026, 01:40
246,815
-85
6 Aug 2026, 03:50
246,900
-10
6 Aug 2026, 00:54
246,910
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:00
246,910
first reading
Engagement
97 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.61%
avg views ÷ 246,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,200
97 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
97
of 97 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
97 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
2,058,390
Reactions total
41,911
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,370
Videos
≈5,110
Links
≈4,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
32m 49s
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,292 reactions across 83 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9,724
26.1%
💯
6,695
18.0%
😁
5,289
14.2%
🔥
4,218
11.3%
🤬
3,734
10.0%
🫡
2,793
7.49%
🤔
2,098
5.63%
👏
1,279
3.43%
👎
937
2.51%
🥰
267
0.716%
😢
258
0.692%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41,911reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 97 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NeoficialniyBeZsonoV. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 97 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Объясню. Американцы ввели традиции в память о погибших героях совершать физические испытания и называть их именами эти испытания. Хохлы пошли чуть дальше и делают это на поминках. У нас пошли еще дальше и назвали это сатанизмом.
С другой стороны лучше отжаться чем потом бухать на поминках.😎
Даниил Безсонов спрашивает, что они делают и зачем?
Они косплеят американцев, где в 90-ые появилась такая традиция у подразделений СпН, отжиматься на похоронах. Обычно это делается для сержантов, но не всегда. Аналогично, в ВВС Украины на похоронах пилотов жгут пианино по старой английской традиции.
Хочется подчеркнуть, что несмотря на рассказы о богатой украинской военной культуре, она практически полностью заимст…
📹102 мсп освободил н.п. Петровка
Военнослужащие 102 мсп 150 мсд 8 гвардейской общевойсковой армии нанесли огневое поражение личному составу ВСУ в населенном пункте Петровка, после чего решительными действиями вошли на территорию поселка и взяли его под полный контроль.
Подписывайтесь на телеграмм канал Народная милиция ДНР, чтобы увидеть войну нашими глазами
Кто-то, кто делал на неё ставку, видимо, напрягся и провёл воспитательную беседу. Мол, не хорошо так открыто демонстрировать своё принебрежение к людям. Свалишь. Обязательно свалишь. Но потом.
ВК Max ОК
Со вчерашнего дня смотрю, как мусолят тему "сын бизнесмена Алтушкина на Ламборгини сбил человека".
Ну понятно, что если бы это была старая праворукая "японка", а за рулём сын владельца кофейни, и шуму бы не было.
Впрочем, тут другое важно. Коллега выложил видео ДТП. И судя по этому видео, виновник - это водитель кроссовера. Бывает, не посмотрел, чисто ли справа. Повернул. Жизнь. Таких ситуаций на дороге сотни кажд…
Минобороны России запустило новый раздел на Госуслугах
по вопросам психологической помощи военнослужащим
и членам их семей
Министерство обороны РФ совместно с Министерством цифрового развития, связи и массовых коммуникаций запустили новый специализированный раздел на Едином портале государственных услуг, посвященный оказанию психологической помощи военнослужащим и членам их семей.
Создание нового сервиса обеспечит м…
Знак "движение прямо". Хонда точно не имела права поварачивать. Но водитель Ламбы должен был тормозить, а не маневрировать. Скорее всего автотехническая экспертиза покажет обоюдную вину.
ВК Max ОК
Момент, как Lamborghini влетела в прохожих в Екатеринбурге, попал на камеру видеонаблюдения.
Хонда действительно была и её водитель не убедился в безопасности манёвра.
ВК Max ОК
🤬312💯47🤔12🔥8😁7😢5👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @NeoficialniyBeZsonoV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,494 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 132 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,682,871#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Репортёр Руденко V @RtrDonetsk · 156,492 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Андрей Медведев @MedvedevVesti · 185,028 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие @warhistoryalconafter · 484,362 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
Минобороны России @mod_russia · 631,789 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Военный Осведомитель @milinfolive · 615,498 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
🇷🇺 DONTSTOPWAR @dontstopwar · 245,328 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,682,871 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 August 2026
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺 @notes_veterans · 296,229 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺 @voenacher · 668,207 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Сладков+ @sladkov_plus · 700,975 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Мир Михаила Онуфриенко @mikle1on · 491,919 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition @epoddubny · 573,409 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
Воин DV @voin_dv · 146,901 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
ANNA NEWS @anna_news · 236,537 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Kotsnews @sashakots · 476,342 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Readovka @readovkanews · 2,014,818 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 August 2026
Белорусский силовик @belarusian_silovik · 451,078 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Open Ukraine| Открытая Украина @OpenUkraine · 181,509 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Анастасия Кашеварова 🇷🇺 @akashevarova · 247,566 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Zлой Пруф️ @proofzzz · 602,662 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Рамзай @ramzayiegokomanda · 153,338 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
СИЛОВИКИ 🇷🇺 @SIL0VIKI · 184,947 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
🇷🇺⚡️Сводки ополчения Новороссии Z.O.V. (ДНР, ЛНР, Украина, Война) @swodki · 222,631 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru) @oper_goblin · 497,493 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 129 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Неофициальный Безсонов” (@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV), 246,428 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeoficialniyBeZsonoV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.