О войне, политике и информационной безопасности.
Поддержать канал:
2200701789654164
Обратная связь: @Info_Defense_bot
РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673b1e48340096358bade8d2®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
2 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 51 days, net -2,608. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 243,911–247,301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 19:40
244,302
-477
19 Sept 2026, 01:59
244,779
-129
16 Sept 2026, 17:18
244,908
-99
14 Sept 2026, 22:00
245,007
-62
13 Sept 2026, 06:40
245,069
-133
11 Sept 2026, 06:17
245,202
-131
8 Sept 2026, 11:37
245,333
-181
5 Sept 2026, 06:38
245,514
-68
3 Sept 2026, 12:37
245,582
-109
2 Sept 2026, 05:23
245,691
-73
1 Sept 2026, 04:16
245,764
-82
31 Aug 2026, 07:27
245,846
-88
30 Aug 2026, 06:56
245,934
-51
29 Aug 2026, 09:42
245,985
-36
28 Aug 2026, 12:06
246,021
+22
27 Aug 2026, 10:26
245,999
+508
26 Aug 2026, 12:06
245,491
-57
25 Aug 2026, 15:17
245,548
-53
24 Aug 2026, 16:16
245,601
-96
22 Aug 2026, 23:25
245,697
first reading
Engagement
623 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.52%
avg views ÷ 244,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,800
334 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
334
of 623 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
623 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
6,949,698
Reactions total
138,891
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,480
Videos
≈5,260
Links
≈4,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8h 44m
Average length
2m 26s
Measured directly from 216 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
252,417 reactions across 609 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
63,757
25.3%
😁
48,071
19.0%
🔥
40,817
16.2%
💯
36,149
14.3%
🤬
22,212
8.80%
🫡
12,812
5.08%
🤔
8,420
3.34%
👏
6,555
2.60%
😢
6,183
2.45%
👎
4,417
1.75%
🥰
3,024
1.20%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 623 of the 623 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257,036 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 623 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
634
across the posts below
Posts paid on
104
of 623 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
251
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NeoficialniyBeZsonoV. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 623 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#новостиДНЯ
▪️Глава МИД России Лавров выступил на Генассамблее ООН.
▪️Турция знает, что перемещение комплексов С-400 за ее пределы потребует согласия России, и не обращалась за ним, - сообщил Сергей Лавров.
▪️Европа делает всё, чтобы сорвать перспективу мирных переговоров по Украине, - заявил Сергей Лавров.
▪️Европейцы готовятся к войне с Россией, - Лавров.
▪️Россия не собирается воевать с Европой, но если на РФ …
Расчёты FPV-дронов и барражирующих боеприпасов «Куб» войск беспилотных систем в составе 20-й гвардейской общевойсковой армии группировки войск «Запад» уничтожили САУ «Богдана» ВСУ на восточном берегу Краснооскольского водохранилища.
ВК Max ОК
Артиллерийские расчеты совместно с операторами БПЛА Южной группировки войск уничтожили пять укрытий с личным составом противника в Краматорском районе.
ВК Max ОК
Боевая работа штурмовых подразделений 36-й бригады 29-й армии группировки «Восток» в ходе освобождения села Светлая Долина в Запорожской области.
ВК Max ОК
Привет Орден, Админ и Даниил.
В феврале 22 года, я, как и многие неравнодушные, следил за тем, как херова развиваются события. Следил через "Вечернего Владлена". Я понимал, что по-любому окажусь на войне. Но не знал, в каком статусе. Сложно было объяснить жене, что ей с маленьким ребенком придется пожить вдвоем и ещё при этом сильно ужать пояс. На тот момент про 200тр речи не было, а рассчитывал я исходя из зарплат р…
#новостиДНЯ
▪️Поездка на саммит АТЭС будет зависеть от ситуации внутри России, - Путин. Ранее Трамп заявил, что поедет на этот саммит.
▪️Все предложения по мирному урегулированию «на столе», но России еще нужно подумать, что в ее интересах, - Путин.
▪️Ответ РФ на атаки Киева был настолько чувствительным, что тот запросил перемирие, - Путин.
▪️Отказ от российского газа для Армении будет куда более болезненным, чем…
В копилочку фотографий членов Ордена.
С друзьями смотрели Серую Зону на школьной перемене. По окончанию сразу вписался в движ.
Спустя неделю, как была сделана фотография, произошла прожарка, но на злобу недругам остался жив и в строю. 💀
Вот кстати архив с 23 года.
Как только школу закончил,сразу заскочил на вечеринку.
Админ,спасибо тебе за знания и за настрой.
Это был настоящий рок-н-ролл!
Showing the 12 most recent of 623 posts we hold for @NeoficialniyBeZsonoV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 161 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 169 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 11 posts, 8 August 2026 – 24 September 2026
@radio_sputnik named in 1 post, 15 September 2026 – 15 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,672,095#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FRONT SIDE OF THE MEDAL @rsotmvideo · 93,211 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
Канал специального назначения @okspn · 130,747 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
Донецкий стрингер (Бородатый документалист) @stringer_donetsk · 22,704 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Кирилл Фёдоров Видео 🇷🇺 @fyodorovkirill · 23,970 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
Военкор Астрахань @astrahandm · 28,088 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Народная милиция ДНР @nm_dnr · 47,733 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
РОГОЗИН @rogozin_do · 91,667 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
ФРИДРИХ 🎭 @FridrihShow · 67,099 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
ЧВК Медиа @chvkmedia · 25,247 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Лыня🇷🇺 @Lunay14 · 22,465 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
РОКОТ @surf_noise1 · 59,712 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Осведомитель @infomil_live · 94,719 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
Military analytics🇺🇦 @the_military_analytics · 98,808 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Inside 🅉 Donetsk @Doninside · 24,415 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
RUSVARG @rusvarg · 38,763 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
Евгений Попов @vladivostok1978 · 57,872 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Русский тарантасъ @DmitriySteshin · 136,783 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Никита Третьяков @tretyakov_n · 26,067 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
Судоплатов @sudoplatov_official · 75,312 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 25 August 2026
WarDonbass @WarDonbass · 51,232 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Репортёр Руденко V @RtrDonetsk · 155,235 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Андрей Медведев @MedvedevVesti · 183,029 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие @warhistoryalconafter · 481,589 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
Минобороны России @mod_russia · 650,718 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 591 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Неофициальный Безсонов” (@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV), 244,302 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeoficialniyBeZsonoV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.