Quick One.. Do This Asap.! dac_chain Interstellar Pre-registration is live. How to register..? https://x.com/Okpara081/status/2102483318033781162
❤5

Channel
@dannystribe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,919subscribers
-1,260 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001678167730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dannystribe |
| Description | Buy the blood 🩸 Sell the Grass 🍃 Twitter: @/dannycrypt |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dannystribe |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:38 | 25,919 | -27 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 07:01 | 25,946 | -8 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:31 | 25,954 | -22 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:54 | 25,976 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:27 | 25,990 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:57 | 26,003 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:38 | 26,012 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:51 | 26,025 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:00 | 26,038 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 26,047 | -10 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 26,057 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 26,064 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 26,076 | -19 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 26,095 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 26,105 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 26,107 | -15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:51 | 26,122 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 26,130 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 26,142 | -24 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 26,166 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 50 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
118 reactions across 30 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 66.1% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 23.7% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Quick One.. Do This Asap.! dac_chain Interstellar Pre-registration is live. How to register..? https://x.com/Okpara081/status/2102483318033781162
❤5
I will create a different group for Degen trading, to stop spamming here with meme pictures..
❤14👍6
We just smashed 10X on this call.. $500k MC - $5.2M MC.. Don't forget to take profit.. $Ping is slowly catching up, I expect good price Discovery probably from tomorrow..
❤6
>Sellers are are running out of token. >Dev is still active & shipping on X. >Tech actually works. >New innovation. Repricing soon, just a matter of time..
❤1
$Dark new ATH at $4M MC.. Still holding my bag, took out only capital.. I believe work is not yet done, the Dev is still shipping..
I still believe this will cook.. Ping stats so far within 2day.. - 3.33M in volume. - 200 people texting. - 3.50M $PING burnt. Got Retweeted today by Solan. The fake token that launched as them went as high as 1M MC within 1hour after solana Retweet.
👍3❤2
Launch, research & trade by text. Should cook. X page, you can DYOR.. https://x.com/PingTheAgent?s=20 CA.. 0x1928c289929314a85d9b888052d824ad74c62da0 Also manage your risk..
❤1
For traders.. Vertical just went live, get funded up to $300K.. https://x.com/Okpara081/status/2102098303571877959
We're 2X up. If you're still building capital always take out your initial capital after 2X.. Volume is actually poor, probably because of the ongoing crisis..?
🐳4
5 list of New interesting projects on $Sui $Sui is slowly catching up with RWA/Memecoin pairs.. Take action and position early. https://x.com/Okpara081/status/2101940622613434459
He did something similar in 2023.. Mint price was $8 - Ath 0.38E. Currently FP is still trading at 0.177 $500.
This could be an alpha for those that based in US.. If you have X Money you can gamble on it, only if you are willingly to let go of $8. https://x.com/jackbutcher/status/2101796578428104762 Please if you're base in US I will appreciate if you can help me out, I will send you the usdt..
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @dannystribe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@dannystribe edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @dannystribe as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dannystribe named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 68 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Danny’s Tribe 🧸” (@dannystribe), 25,919 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dannystribe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.