Channel
@Noodles_calls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,978subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001472482745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Noodles_calls |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Noodles_calls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 11,978 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 11,992 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 12,002 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 12,003 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 12,010 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 12,015 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 12,019 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 12,024 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 12,035 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 12,037 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
174 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 95 | 54.6% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 20.7% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 13.8% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 2.87% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.30% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.575% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This is what we built for NoodlesResearch terminal. Cycle models, on-chain metrics, regime indicators. Everything to help investors understand the market and know where they stand. Free and open to everyone soon. noodlesresearch.com/terminal Would you buy here?
❤15👍2
What Looks Like a Pump and Dump Is Something Far Worse: Crypto was supposed to be different https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2054235663206339064?s=46&t=ONYZLkvb1kOwI9Cg7eYq4Q
❤8👍4
There’s a new metric in town that will be more viral than the Fear and Greed Index. We built it. It’s called the Noodles Cycle Index. https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2051706771451130300?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ
🔥6❤1
CRYPTO CYCLE UPDATE Bitcoin is on Day 732 of Cycle 4, deep in the Distribution phase that historically precedes bear market initiation. The bear market window opens in 68 days, based on the four-cycle halving framework. Current phase matches structural signatures of Oct 2021 and Nov 2017 tops. Full breakdown: https://feed.noodlesresearch.com/?post=967fd35f-9db2-440c-96db-e3b7869ea7c4 The Noodles Research Feed is o…
❤7🔥2
Channel name was changed to «Noodles Research»
People think I enjoy being bearish. That it’s a hobby, a personality trait. It’s not. Every serious investor knows: real money is made in bull markets. That’s exactly why we built the Noodles Terminal. To identify the historical patterns that signal when to position, not guess. For now, the metrics are clear. This is our first dedicated crypto research piece: noodlesresearch.com/research/btc-peaked-126k-what-comes…
🔥5❤3🎉1
Channel photo updated
Bitcoin cycle 4 peaked at $126,000 on October 6, 2025. Returns measured halving to peak across four cycles: +9,200%, +2,900%, +700%, +97%. The compression is consistent and structural, roughly 70 to 85 percent less per cycle. NUPL at 28.6, Loss Supply Deviation at 1.40, Stablecoin Cycle Index at 47 percent cash. Three independent frameworks, same distribution signature. Full analysis, invalidation triggers, and wh…
❤8👏3
NoodlesResearch is built on three pillars: technical analysis, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic analysis. What sets us apart is that we do not stop at theory. Our mission is to turn complex market structure into clear, actionable execution. A real compass for every crypto investor who wants clarity, discipline, and direction. https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2002680469272347022?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ
💯3👍2🔥2❤1
📅 On December 5th at 2 PM GMT, we’re breaking everything down live: “How We Predicted the Crypto Market Crash & The 7 Signals Revealing What Comes Next.” 🔍 Inside the event, you’ll learn: • How we called the top • The 7 signals that predicted it • What they’re flashing right now • The realistic outlook for the next 12–24 months • Where asymmetric opportunities form • How to position without guessing 👉 Register h…
❤12⚡2🏆2
• We’re executing with precision across every phase. https://x.com/noodlesresearch/status/1948008449524031995?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ
🔥9❤3🐳3
Ethereum just had one of its biggest bull moves ever and we nailed it. Most importantly, we’re focused on get profits in the right way, spotting the market top, which we’re convinced will come at a precise moment. A thread 👇 https://x.com/criptopaul/status/1920872642300572130?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ
❤16👍3🍾2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Noodles_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 231,576 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Noodles Research” (@Noodles_calls), 11,978 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Noodles_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.