Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for based kook calls

Channel

based kook calls

@hellokook

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,218subscribers

-197 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002082341024
TypeChannel
Username@hellokook
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hellokook

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,21816,41516,316.57 August 2026 — 16,415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,409 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,411 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,408 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,392 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,379 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,365 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,350 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,339 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,327 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,324 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,319 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,318 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,317 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,338 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,340 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,333 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,334 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,331 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,322 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,311 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,308 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,306 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,300 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,289 subscribers7 September 2026 — 16,273 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,251 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,235 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,231 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,220 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,218 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,188–16,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:1916,218-2
15 Sept 2026, 18:2016,220-11
14 Sept 2026, 03:5916,231-4
12 Sept 2026, 08:5816,235-16
10 Sept 2026, 08:0016,251-22
7 Sept 2026, 02:1916,273-16
4 Sept 2026, 07:2016,289-11
2 Sept 2026, 21:4516,300-6
1 Sept 2026, 20:2616,306-2
31 Aug 2026, 17:0816,308-3
30 Aug 2026, 20:0416,311-11
29 Aug 2026, 21:2416,322-9
28 Aug 2026, 19:5416,331-3
27 Aug 2026, 22:2616,334+1
27 Aug 2026, 00:4216,333-7
26 Aug 2026, 01:5516,340+2
25 Aug 2026, 02:1516,338+21
23 Aug 2026, 15:4516,317-1
22 Aug 2026, 00:5816,318-1
20 Aug 2026, 21:4416,319first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.24%
avg views ÷ 16,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
849
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held56 (29 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total9,342
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 45s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

604 reactions across 54 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥19231.8%
❤14824.5%
🐳12220.2%
🦄538.77%
😇233.81%
🤯132.15%
💅121.99%
😱111.82%
👍71.16%
👏50.828%
🆒40.662%
🤓40.662%
🏆30.497%
💯30.497%
👀20.331%
😈20.331%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 604 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:26 UTC197 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

3x on $doge-1 and counting!!!! i think this might be a really good one....... launch soon!!!!! send it 🫡 ======== Nᴏᴛ ꜰɪɴᴀɴᴄɪᴀʟ ᴀᴅᴠɪᴄᴇ. I ᴍɪɢʜᴛ ɢᴇᴛ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜɪs ᴄᴏɴᴛᴇɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ/ᴏʀ ʙᴜʏ, ʜᴏʟᴅ ᴀɴᴅ sᴇʟʟ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴇɴᴛɪᴏɴᴇᴅ ᴀssᴇᴛ/ᴘʀᴏᴊᴇᴄᴛ. Cʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ɪs ʀɪsᴋʏ. DYOR. Sᴇᴇ ꜰᴜʟʟ Dɪsᴄʟᴀɪᴍᴇʀ H E R E ca: 0x3ec8a8174129d5cbecef67ee2af8621319c34c03 direct link: https://basedbot.app/r/kookcapital/token/robinhood/0x3ec8a8174129d5cbecef67ee2a…

❤1🐳1🔥1🦄1

2 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC643 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚀 $DOGE-1 (robinhood) this is a real launch i think this narrative can gain serious traction details 👇🏻 DOGE-1 is the next big SpaceX satellite launch DOGE-1 isn't just another meme. It's Elon Musk’s satellite blasting into space aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket the FIRST commercial lunar payload in HISTORY funded entirely by cryptocurrency, Dogecoin to be specific. This is the moment crypto will break the atmosph…

🔥3🐳2😇2💅1

1 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC619 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

damn somebody just used the $250k MetaWin gave away yesterday to win $120k they just announced their free $1,000 offer is back everyone who uses code X100 when they deposit on metawin.com gets their first deposit doubled up to $1k i would go take advantage while this lasts, MetaWin is getting bigger everyday once they are the biggest crypto casino they are not going to give away money everyday like this

❤3🐳2🔥2😈1

30 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC900 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🍕 $pizza (robinhood) hold $pizza get $btc think it might be a good one dyor ======== Nᴏᴛ ꜰɪɴᴀɴᴄɪᴀʟ ᴀᴅᴠɪᴄᴇ. I ᴍɪɢʜᴛ ɢᴇᴛ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜɪs ᴄᴏɴᴛᴇɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ/ᴏʀ ʙᴜʏ, ʜᴏʟᴅ ᴀɴᴅ sᴇʟʟ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴇɴᴛɪᴏɴᴇᴅ ᴀssᴇᴛ/ᴘʀᴏᴊᴇᴄᴛ. Cʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ɪs ʀɪsᴋʏ. DYOR. Sᴇᴇ ꜰᴜʟʟ Dɪsᴄʟᴀɪᴍᴇʀ H E R E ca: 0xce065f3bfcee1fd9fa8b2e83098f1e68d4aeefd6

🐳4🔥4🦄3😱2❤1

30 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC≈1,020 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

clean 2x on $PLTR already imo this is going to $10m so based ca: 0xff5f5ed5380a628427c9cf76d573a10a5521ec31

🔥5❤3💅2🐳1

29 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC≈1,080 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

stonkbroker going to ath btw

🔥7❤2🐳2🦄1

29 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,130 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🕵🏻‍♀️ $PLTR - Palantir this is palantir coin i really fw this meme, its soooo based..... go on the website you will see perfect incel gooncoin waifu spy token i love it hold 0.1% and get paid in $PLTR shares theres no good palantir meme onchain yet, this is the best rwa meme ive seen i really like it aped it on fomo and will keep building a position targetting 1-2% 'all your base are belong to us' send it!!!!…

❤5🐳2🔥2😇1

29 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC969 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

cant believe some people thought the president launched a coin with this banner insane 😂

🐳4🔥3🦄2❤1💅1

28 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC984 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🍐 pair dot fund (launchpad) someone showed me this weird new launchpad where you can make the base of a trading pair a basket of tokens instead of just one token i think thats a pretty cool idea i aped the flagship token which is 'pear' its the biggest off the pad and most volume, seems like the main, its got aapl nvda msft as the base then i aped a degen gamble called 'x holdings' which has tsla and spcx as the …

❤3🐳3🔥3😇1

28 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC840 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

wow one of you just turned 40 cents into $10k on MetaWin i only play here because they don’t push fake streamer slop every time somebody wins the entire discord gets pinged with the real replay and they actually let you withdraw the entire bag they just announced that they’re giving their players $300,000 in rewards over the next 3 days if you deposit on metawin.com, you qualify make sure you go take advantage,…

👏5❤2🔥2🐳1

28 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC960 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

we had a slight netnet dip after ansem shill but thats to be expected he often marks a local top but then sends it way higher chart is looking great now and i think new highs are coming (🥅,🥅)

🐳3🔥3❤2😇1

25 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC≈1,310 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

netnet is the future nfa dyor this is probably going to $10k still under 3000 holders.....

🔥10🦄5❤3🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @hellokook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,650
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Make Money With Matt 💰
@MakeMoneyWithMattTG · 27,951
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 10 September 2026
shah’s trading journal
@shahlito · 31,688
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,671
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 32,542
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,984
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 26,471
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 40,779
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,453
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 82,222
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Криптокрип Сайлер
@mrsyler · 56,163
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
O’zbekiston Milliy Universitet (O'zMU)
@milliy_universitut · 28,538
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 15 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,212
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,416
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
CryptoHylos 🍀 - Official
@CryptoHylos · 1,613,375
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 27,315
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 September 2026
ASL FUTBOL (LIVE)
@ASL_FUTBOL_LIVE_GOLLAR_inline_tv · 40,384
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 29,241
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,870
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 September 2026
Благовещенск №1
@amurblg1 · 45,224
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 85,334
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Святослав Гусев
@gusevself · 57,363
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
Slowpoke Investments
@slowpoke_investments · 23,975
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“based kook calls” (@hellokook), 16,218 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hellokook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.