Channel
@Stuff_I_Ape
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,365subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001772336089 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Stuff_I_Ape |
| Description | These are just projects I am aping into with my own funds. Ape at your OWN RISK |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Stuff_I_Ape |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 5,365 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 5,357 | +20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 5,337 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 5,337 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (28 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,019 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Just take a moment to appreciate this video, it is relatable regardless of what token you are holding. I think everyone can relate to if it you spend more than a few hours a week diving into crypto. From a $WEN perspective, the fact they're STILL putting out this type of quality content despite how the chart looks speaks volumes about the team. You could slap Coinbase logo at the end of it and run something like th…
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
Added more $BULL today, 4m feels like a really good floor. Working on a longer form thread, I think it's going to pop pretty hard here this week. They've been adding LP, I think another chunk is coming too, it's exactly what you want a team to do when charts dip. https://x.com/monaco_pnl/status/2086950530807398489?s=20
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
Hunting any dips on $BULL I fired at 5m+ on miggles You think im uncomfortable doing 10m or above? Shit went to 180m last time, on size a 10x is MUNYUN When I really believe in something, you can know im gonna push it as far as I can and historically speaking,.. That's very far https://x.com/monaco_pnl/status/2086195064888267012?s=20
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
I think today we see some pons love from the team Another leg up is forming https://x.com/monaco_pnl/status/2086121600974266782?s=46&t=cHCFPE3LG43Fa1kFEK8rKw
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
Gm $BULLievers
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
The future is wide open for $BULL Genuine best chance at a 100m+ runner here once again https://x.com/monaco_pnl/status/2085971476407009769?s=20
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
That 5x gonna look alot better with a 0 next to it in due time 🙉 $BULL fam we ride https://x.com/monaco_pnl/status/2085949505652838897?s=20
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
I'm feeling MIGGLISH BULLISH
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
Bullish
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
Oh my 2m entry is on fomo btw, finally made one https://fomo.family/r/monaco_pnl
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
MIGGLES team launched a token, and publicly are pushing this $BULL early Robinhood IP they registered in 2020 that nobody picked up https://x.com/comfyrelax/status/2085876774878007430?s=20 I sized in just like I did last time and rode from 5m - 180m 2m entry here https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x710a3dbff44d8a2a5d3eac192dcf8a1e7bc0081815bc612839c3c7713413c27a
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
What on earth is happening right now 😂😂
Signed messiah 🐌🏎
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Stuff_I_Ape. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 873,592 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stuff im (Penn) buying” (@Stuff_I_Ape), 5,365 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stuff_I_Ape.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.