Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chad Crypto

Channel

Chad Crypto

@Chad_Crypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,696subscribers

-757 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001566965213
TypeChannel
Username@Chad_Crypto
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Chad_Crypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,69616,45316,074.57 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net -757. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,582–16,567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:5115,696-9
9 Nov 2026, 18:0915,705-11
8 Nov 2026, 11:4815,716-5
7 Nov 2026, 06:5715,721-6
6 Nov 2026, 09:3815,727-14
5 Nov 2026, 07:4615,741-6
4 Nov 2026, 07:2915,747-2
3 Nov 2026, 04:5115,749-6
2 Nov 2026, 01:5515,755-7
1 Nov 2026, 04:4915,762-9
31 Oct 2026, 07:0615,771-7
30 Oct 2026, 08:3815,778-7
29 Oct 2026, 06:0915,785-4
28 Oct 2026, 07:3715,789-10
27 Oct 2026, 04:4815,799-3
26 Oct 2026, 06:2715,802-6
25 Oct 2026, 03:2015,808-8
24 Oct 2026, 01:2815,816-5
23 Oct 2026, 02:5915,821-8
22 Oct 2026, 05:5915,829first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7742.3%
🔥6133.5%
👍137.14%
👀105.49%
💯63.30%
😱42.20%
🥰42.20%
🤯31.65%
🎅21.10%
💔10.549%
😇10.549%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC≈2,420 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Everyone is talking about Uniswap V4 hooks. $BACKED is the only verified V4 hook on robinhood

👍5

23 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC≈3,010 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Hit like $14m ATM so far, currently around $10m Secured initials and little bit of profit. Hopefully carries on higher

❤4🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 05:52 UTC≈2,990 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Stable chain publicly supporting https://x.com/stable/status/2080166573340504403

❤1

23 Jul 2026, 04:50 UTC≈2,140 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$5m so far for $FEFER Think it can go higher still as there is still friction with the bridging process Can use relay to bridge, just need to wait til there is sufficient liquidity. Stargate bridge also works Chart can be seen here https://feferstable.vercel.app

❤1🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC≈2,440 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Bought some $FEFER on stablechain Comes from Paolo tweet earlier https://x.com/paoloardoino/status/2079944319864033781 Just below $1m mc currently Hardly anyone has bridged yet, so could be early Could be the first meme runner on stablechain by Tether. First meme on a new chain normally does very well, so aped just in case Bridge to stablechain with relay: relay.link/bridge/stable Buy on dyorswap: https://dyors…

❤3👍1

22 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,940 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026

$BACKED have just launched perps https://x.com/isbacked_/status/2079908568447525034

19 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,560 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

I’m in $BACKED on RH Backed accumulates stocks which backs the token, creating a floor price which it can’t go below The backing rises both with volume and with the stocks appreciation There is $32k in backing already Robinhood is publicly supporting RWA heavily, and this fits the bill https://t.me/isBacked https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x537217eb9534d5d606bff54f8b807df65ce48678877ee3151f92f26bb94c1243

❤9💯4👍1

23 Jun 2025, 17:56 UTC≈11,400 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026

$BANANA pro is now live 🍌🔫 The best sniper and trading bot finally launched their web app 👇 https://pro.bananagun.io/app?referral=D2f_Gj3t

❤10😱1

18 Jun 2025, 15:13 UTC≈10,700 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$LICKO starting to fly Wait til people actually start bridging to the chain First meme on HYPE, which is one of the most talked about new chains, making new ATHs

🔥8❤5🥰1😱1

17 Jun 2025, 18:43 UTC≈7,300 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🦎 How To Buy $LICKO 🦎 1. Install MetaMask Wallet or use an EVM compatible wallet: You can also use select trading bots to buy such as: t.me/maestro 2. Load up MetaMask or your trading bot with HYPE ($HYPE) from any supported exchanges 3. If using MetaMask or any EVM compatible wallet go to: app.debridge.finance to bridge any asset to HyperEVM 4. Once your $HYPE has been bridged to HyperEVM go over to: app.hyper…

❤4🤯3

17 Jun 2025, 18:41 UTC≈5,350 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Aped $LICKO, first meme on HyperEVM Hyperliquid and HyperEVM keeps gaining more attention daily and $LICKO is like the LOFI of hyperEVM (LOFI went to $250m as the first meme on SUI) Same chill art and vibes, extremely memeable, and seen some solid people backing already 🌐 https://hypelicko.com 🐥 https://x.com/hypelick 📩 https://t.me/HypeLicko 📈 https://dexscreener.com/hyperevm/0x8dab9c7fa9198e415528b7ee2c6201f15dc…

❤3🎅2😇1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Chad_Crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈
@teammacnbtc · 32,126
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Eric Cryptomans Journal
@erics_calls · 30,755
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,171
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
EZ Money’s Gems 💎
@EZMoneyCalls · 22,915
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 28,242
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,943
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,046
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Jarzom₿ek - OGŁOSZENIA
@jarzombek · 19,839
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chad Crypto” (@Chad_Crypto), 15,696 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chad_Crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.