Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Insider Calls

@inside_calls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,236subscribers

-65 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001468580992
TypeChannel
Username@inside_calls
Description⚔️The main channel for smart legends and 24/7 grindors. Not Financial Advices! NO PAID CHANNELS! MY GAMBLE PLAYS CHANNEL LEGENDS -> https://t.me/+EhffJ5IkGGI3YmY6 @geminsides for requests / @gemdetecter if I don't reply
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inside_calls

Growth

25,23625,30125,268.56 August 2026 — 25,301 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,301 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,298 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,294 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,275 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,261 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,254 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,236 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,226–25,311 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:1525,236-18
11 Aug 2026, 11:0825,254-7
10 Aug 2026, 09:2625,261-14
9 Aug 2026, 07:5425,275-19
8 Aug 2026, 05:3525,294-4
7 Aug 2026, 06:5825,298-3
6 Aug 2026, 23:4525,301no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:3725,301first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.81%
avg views ÷ 25,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held38 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total55,710
Reactions total1,553
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,930
Videos
22
Links
979

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,553 reactions across 38 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥66542.8%
50332.4%
👍38524.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,553reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC617 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

another Robinhood leg, another $TYGR rally 🔥 $TYGR just pumped 2X from my dip call $800k —> $1.7M ✔️ cat szn is back on Robinhood - $CASHCAT is back above $150M - $HMM just ripped to $20M - now its time for $TYGR to roar whales are in. the biggest $TYGR holder with 4% supply is #2 holder in $HMM and has good bag. higher 🔥

🔥273👍2

12 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC843 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

normies are learning about $STONKBROKER first Bloomberg article published the FOMO rush here will be surreal 🔥

24👍22

12 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,010 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$JIMOTHY ain't done yet... I'm still seeing many big accounts posting about the Jimothy, some are publishing memes, articles, and comics on this short spined raccoon we could see another upside leg here stay position in

🔥2910👍5

12 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,010 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

good morning legends!!! ☕️

28👍25

11 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,300 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$ANSEM is back trading above $200M mc accumulation phase is over. the Black Bull is ready to charge forward. we might witness more ANSEM memes like $MANLET, which keep pushing $ANSEM upwards and catalyse meme eco. bullish on meme szn 🔥

12

11 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,260 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$lickingcat bottom is in the video of cat licking the Earth is still going viral. the lore is building up, it has over 40M+ views on X. perfect dip if u missed the early entry.

10

11 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,250 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$STONKBROKER is in its dream run 🔥 12X from my first post. fresh mint Stonkbroker NFT floor is now over 13 ETH. no doubt this is how the winning assets perform irrespective of the market. NFT x RWA x DeFi x launchpad x DEX don't tell me you got sidelined here 👀

🔥30

11 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,250 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

GM GM insiders 🔥 market faced some serious resistance today, especially across the heavyweights like $BTC and $ETH and so did our bags. but lets continue accumulating the best ones. lets get that big pump energy here

👍2320🔥5

10 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,320 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$FRONG is slowly getting back into motion double digits first, ATH next.... its coded in fam. Just stay FRONG 🐸

🔥2310

10 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,330 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

now thats what I called as INSIDER EFFECT 🔥 almost 50% up within a business hour $licking cat has just entered the price discovery mode. send this higher 🚀

🔥31👍73

10 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,300 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

got a bag of $lickingcat at 1M mc the meme is a cat licking a spinning Earth. it started as a funny “scientific fact” style video, then people started remixing and memeing it heavily on X. degens pushing it as "Earth spinning because Cat is licking it" good lore going viral across the socials. decent entry to bid before another breakout. CA: EjD5Y9NVhXmtEqU7wYvAyZvDWZFQeEuHXFatJmTbpump

🔥286

10 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,340 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

this $FRONG setup is quite hard to fade 🐸 earlier we caught $IF which ran till 30M, now we have FRONG, a community-owned meme forged in the @TradePools trenches. the interesting part is the LP setup with @TradePools + Uniswap and the autocompounding mechanism. this gives the meme a liquidity narrative most random coins don't have looks good dip to stack in before the next upside leg stay $FRONG 0x6245e67affA44

🔥32

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @inside_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 864,648 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Insider Calls” (@inside_calls), 25,236 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inside_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.