Merry Christmas homies, we jollymaxxing this year 🎅 Sacrificed so much shit for this internet money gotta give it back to the family

Channel
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,901subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001386723491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @senzu_calls |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/senzu_calls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 6,901 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 6,914 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 6,924 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 6,926 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
was uncapped mint but now its minting again https://basescan.org/token/0x699727f9e01a822efdcf7333073f0461e5914b4e https://farcaster.xyz/sayangel/0xe7ed6fc2 https://farcaster.xyz/sayangel/0x6c75fb60 theyre debating capping total supply or not but ppl at farcaster are absolutely retarded so wouldn't be surprised if they leave it uncapped which equals gg
https://opensea.io/collection/the-warplets-farcaster im buying these on open sea they're lowk fire 99% chance im donating money
😭🥀
honestly sucks but ought to have op sec around exported private keys, same way you ought to always have a fresh wallet with some money in it like 5-20k incase you're ever robbed in person you can give the robber that and keep the rest of your money
nah jokes aside gg i think if you connected your gmgn wallet to telegram the hacker is able to drain your wallet by apeing into his honeypot
but its always had 0 money
it has 0 money
omg my gmgn wallet
i've been testing out gemmer to try and hit good coins early and its been really useful thus far try it if you like its essentially memescope but shows all chains with more filtering, currently in beta stage dm the owner @iladnashh if you have any questions https://x.com/Gemmer_bot Gemmer.bot
tldr robotics meta on bsc 1m circ mc
$HAVEN looks good sub 1m circ pre much model that lets you test your physical robots virtually, can simulate playgrounds as well using digital twins (plug usb in) digital twins = virtual assembly of real life physical robots, helps prevent damages, lets you do remote-tasks etc. also has a robotics launchpad with a flywheel similar to virtual https://haven.science/ new coin fees + migrations all go back to $haven h…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @senzu_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,322,715 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@PowsGemCalls · 113,541
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@MaestroBotsHub · 171,794
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@WatcherGuru · 626,953
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Senzu Calls 🔱” (@senzu_calls), 6,901 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/senzu_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.