Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,251. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,374–27,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 19:19
25,562
-18
5 Nov 2026, 21:07
25,580
-18
4 Nov 2026, 21:00
25,598
-32
3 Nov 2026, 17:47
25,630
-15
2 Nov 2026, 20:16
25,645
-16
1 Nov 2026, 18:10
25,661
-21
31 Oct 2026, 15:08
25,682
-11
30 Oct 2026, 18:38
25,693
-12
29 Oct 2026, 17:27
25,705
-21
28 Oct 2026, 16:31
25,726
-7
27 Oct 2026, 16:49
25,733
-17
26 Oct 2026, 16:27
25,750
-24
25 Oct 2026, 16:16
25,774
-8
24 Oct 2026, 15:15
25,782
-10
23 Oct 2026, 18:17
25,792
+16
22 Oct 2026, 18:06
25,776
-16
21 Oct 2026, 13:58
25,792
-18
20 Oct 2026, 10:28
25,810
-11
19 Oct 2026, 09:38
25,821
-48
18 Oct 2026, 07:34
25,869
first reading
Engagement
138 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.14%
avg views ÷ 25,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,570
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
90
of 138 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
138 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
141,293
Reactions total
3,842
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 20:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
348
Videos
3
Links
154
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8,194 reactions across 138 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,500
54.9%
🔥
1,459
17.8%
💯
324
3.95%
👍
267
3.26%
🫡
234
2.86%
🤣
227
2.77%
👏
211
2.58%
😭
157
1.92%
😁
124
1.51%
🤯
124
1.51%
🐳
120
1.46%
🙏
96
1.17%
👀
82
1.00%
🤷♂
53
0.647%
😍
44
0.537%
🤝
44
0.537%
✍
27
0.33%
😎
27
0.33%
😈
23
0.281%
👌
20
0.244%
3 further kinds
31
0.378%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 90 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
lets win some more
We really should be 2/5 bullets already
but javonte williams got scammed and went under barely on one of our bullets if u remember
hope to just keep succeeding on these bullets
and rack up as much money possible sent to everyone who following me especially while its bear market these stimmys hit different
If Pistons won today I think they'd win by only 3
Like 111-108 115-112 114-111
If 76ers win I think we see something like winning by 6-20 points
112-93
109-103
114-103
Before ever doing anything with rainbet
I legit lost track of how much money I gave away with zero support from any company or anyone
To so many ppl on X, VERIFIED and receipts posted on X from hundreds of ppl
And yet truly rn the posts are so undervalued in the algorithm bc
One, we haven't succeeded yet
Two, ppl see it as gambling promotion so it does less good in the algo until it doesn't
Once we start poppin…
While it would be disappointing to lose this one today
Accept the worst case
And be happy with the base and best case
Hope we can giveaway $25k finally today
And if not today, it will be another day in the near future
U know
Very few people use logic
Which makes it much easier to stand out in the comments and be in the minority that actually share their username to be tipped on rainbet
❤28🔥8🤣5
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @dontbetthehouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
crash alerts - leverage controllers @crashalerts · 19,051 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Brozinkers @brozinkers · 52,371 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
IONIC XBT @theionicxbtt · 22,947 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
REDO - Resistance Dog Portal @redotoken · 26,909 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
GS Memecoins (Public) @degenwar · 22,703 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
HD’s Crypto Casino @wallethuntersio · 23,008 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 September 2026
Shmoos Journal ✍️ @shmooscasino · 29,327 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
Shmoo’s Calls @shmooscalls · 36,746 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Ralph’s Call @ralphscall · 29,134 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
OverDose Gems Calls @overdose_gems_calls · 47,274 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Insider Calls @inside_calls · 24,919 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Crypto Mason @cryptomasun · 28,211 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
Euni Calls 🦄 @eunicalls · 28,702 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe @CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,994 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Ash Crypto @AshCryptoTG · 58,449 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
100x Calls 💎 @x100xcallz · 23,000 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Bitbull Trading @BK_btc_trading · 23,961 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵 @dogendojo · 28,369 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Rekt Fencer @rektfencer_threads · 74,923 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc @jojiinnercircle · 19,363 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Shah’s Journal @shahlito · 30,936 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈 @teammacnbtc · 32,189 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“don’t bet the house” (@dontbetthehouse), 25,562 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dontbetthehouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.